tip off

Newspoll: 51-49 to Coalition

Newspoll has opened its account for 2013 with an encouraging result for Labor, recording a primary vote six points higher than the previous poll of December 7-9.

The result of the first Newspoll for 2013 has been reported by AAP (your guess as to how that’s come about is as good as mine) and almost simultaneously by the ever-reliable James J, and it’s a relatively encouraging one for Labor who trail just 51-49 on two-party preferred, down from 54-46 in the final poll of 2012. The primary votes are 38% for Labor, up six on last time, with the Coalition and the Greens both down two, to 44% and 9% respectively. Julia Gillard is up two on approval to 38% and down three on disapproval to 49% while Tony Abbott is up one to 29% and down one to 58%. Gillard leads as preferred prime minister by 45-33, up from 43-34.

UPDATE (16/1/13): A Morgan face-to-face result covering both the previous two weekends (and presumably warranting more than the usual degree of caution on account of the holiday period) has the Coalition leading 51-49 when preferences are distributed as per the 2010 election result, and by 52-48 according to respondent allocation. The primary votes are 36.5% for Labor, 41.5% for the Coalition and 10.5% for the Greens. This follows what now looks an aberrant result in the final poll of last year, when Labor led 53.5-46.5 on previous election preferences and 52.5-47.5 on respondent-allocated.

UPDATE (19/1/13): AAP reports a ReachTEL poll of 511 respondents conducted for the United Voice union in Wayne Swan’s Brisbane seat of Lilley suggests he is heading for defeat, trailing LNP candidate Rod McGarvie 45% to 38% on the primary vote.

3565
  • 3501
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Anyway, on this issue I happen to think the workers of western Sydney are right and the professionals in Paddington are wrong.

    And thankfully, those Western Sydneysiders will make it a whole lot easier for the Coalition to win the election.

  • 3502
    Oakeshott Country
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t Earle Page introduce the pre-cursor to Medicare (but without the middle class welfare)?

  • 3503
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    every time I’ve had a problem, I’ve found my member (current and former) to be very helpful.

    I’m glad your member is still being helpful at 81.

  • 3504
    Toorak Toff
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Labor’s 2PP vote has improved to 49% in a couple of recent polls – but where is it happening? That WA state poll shows there is no love for Labor over there and the Lilley poll is likewise discouraging. Downer could give the SA Libs a bounce, too.

    Queensland, with Katter in the mix, might be a show, but it looks like only Rudd can bring it home.

  • 3505
    frednk
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Psephos
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 2:57 pm | Permalink
    ....
    Anyway, on this issue I happen to think the workers of western Sydney are right and the professionals in Paddington are wrong.

    An honest answer.

    I was thinking about the terminal damage that has been done to the Liberal party by the right wing, and the continual exit of the moderates the other day (after reading the post of another moderate that won’t be renewing her Liberal memebership) and thinking the moderates probable should join the Labor party.

    The Liberal party can’t be saved, but parhaps the Labor party can be, Labor has a faction system under which they could organise.

  • 3506
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Labor’s 2PP vote has improved to 49% in a couple of recent polls – but where is it happening?

    Good question. Everyone keeps telling us that Labor is stuffed in NSW, Tas, WA and the NT. William’s tables suggest that Labor is still behind in Vic and Qld. Yet the Labor 2PV is only 1% lower than it was in 2010. So where are the votes coming from to offset the losses?

  • 3507
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Georgie – the fact is, that Labor is hated in NSW, if you’re not from here, you probably don’t know just how much.

    And historically, Tasmanian results have often been ‘kooky’, and not in line with the others.

    We’re in luck (Coalition voters) for the next couple of months, as we have the AWU rearing its ugly head again, and the sagas of both Slipper and Thomson continuing. To cap it all off, we have another Labor whitewash about to happen in WA.

    My biggest hope from all of this is that the Coalition milks it for all that it can.

  • 3508
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Oakeshott is so gone and only the deluded believe otherwise. Even Labor strategists more than concede that.

  • 3509
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Even Labor strategists more than concede that.

    You talk to a lot of Labor strategists out there in West Gulargambone, do you?

  • 3510
    1934pc
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    JM

    We’re in luck (Coalition voters) for the next couple of months, as we have the AWU rearing its ugly head again, and the sagas of both Slipper and Thomson continuing. To cap it all off, we have another Labor whitewash about to happen in WA.

    Your so cock sure of yourself.
    Your heading for a HUGE disappointment!

  • 3511
    confessions
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Even Labor strategists more than concede that.

    What would an 81yo working class Nationals voter living in the back of beyond and who hates Labor know what Labor strategists are thinking?

  • 3512
    Oakeshott Country
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Gosh JM
    There you are in Bugtussle in the electorate of Parkes but you know how the people of NSW feel about Labor AND ALP strategists tell you their secrets.

  • 3513
    frednk
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    frednk – I opposed medicare myself,

    Out of interest do you have private health insurance?

    I don’t like handouts. My electorate has been eternally National, and schools and hospitals and everything else here are in fine state, and every time I’ve had a problem, I’ve found my member (current and former) to be very helpful. Next time you see an overpriced school hall,

    Your parody missed the point.

    The central issue was supporting the economy when the private sector was in a funk, keeping people employed, it was a period when you were offered $900 to help out. I know some just didn’t understand, didn’t care if the follow Australians lost there jobs and didn’t take the money and do their bit.

    In such an environment a few dollars wasted wasn’t the issue, mind you analysis after the event indicates that the school hall thing actually want pretty well considering there was little time for detailed planning.

    Same with pink bats, very good outcome, if you didn’t have them installed and aren’t now benefiting from reduced energy cost, then more sucker you.

    I’ve never much care for religious wars, be in Protestant/Catholic, or the current flavour of the month, an attack on the Muslim faith, but if your into it, join the right faction of the Labor party. Psephos will surely welcome you, he may want better honed debating skills.

    To be blunt all people who indulge in religious wars can go to hell, and if there is a god I am sure they will.

    [ thousands of Muslim illegal immigrants, and hear the word pink batts, just remember one word – ‘Labor’.

  • 3514
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    It really is an Adelaide Hills conservative wet dream to bring downer back. His appeal is purely name recognition. Sure, he’ll get an initial bump – honeymoon and all that, however, once he has to open his mouth his lack of appeal would be obvious. A conservative man in his 60s, whose peak political career was in the 1990s is not who you want to be trying to unseat a mildly popular progressive in his 40s. Also, the one area where he actually sounds quite knowledgable and eloquent – International Relations – is hardly something that is going to come up in a state election campaign…

  • 3515
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Psephos,

    The important thing is that a vast majority of Australians support tougher Immigration Policy (I’d guess 70-80%). So any notion that pandering to an elitist group of soft on Immigration types is a sensible ploy by Labor is a bizarre misunderstanding of how populist politics works.

    The left and especially the Greens fulminate against any sensible policy that would address the electorates concerns about AS arriving on our shores. This failure of responsibility means the current Government policy is actually being dictated by the Coalition.

    Remember the Government’s preferred position was the Malaysian Solution. However, this option has never been given a chance. Too many politicians obviously have too much interest in keeping the issue alive.

    No doubt if the Coalition win the election Labor would roll over and let the Libs have whatever policy they want simply to get the matter dealt with.

    In the end the Greens and their fellow travellers have abrogated their responsibilities and will deliver a far worse outcome on this issue and they will have no one to blame but themselves for their self indulgence.

  • 3516
    confessions
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Carey M:

    C’mon. You know generational change means something different to the Tories! I mean, look at the Nationals when they made their own generational change to Warren Truss!!

  • 3517
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    I am not saying this just because I am a partisan National, but I believe Newspoll to be wrong, and the Essential figure is more likely to be accurate. It’s not just that it suits me better, it’s that it just doesn’t make sense that Labor is so high, when the public mood has not seem to have changed at all, and how the state polls show that they’re stuffed.

  • 3518
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Confessions

    Haha true! :-)

  • 3519
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    I do watch tv, and read the paper.

  • 3520
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    1934 – and you would know this, how?

  • 3521
    frednk
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    JM

    We’re in luck (Coalition voters) for the next couple of months, as we have the AWU

    Can’t get over how much effort the Liberals are putting into trying to keep that story alive. It underlines in big black Texta how little the Liberal party has to offer.

  • 3522
    Wakefield
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    The Advertiser report today about Natasha Stott-Despoja was michief making from a Liberal source – her marriage to right winger Ian Smith is one of the marvels of human ingenuity but there has been no indication NSD has changed to thinking Liberal.

    The Advertiser article also says NSD could “enter Parliament as an independent and be drafted into Cabinet US-style”.

    Obviously still the silly season in some places.

  • 3523
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Maybe that’s the problem JM. The newspaper’s you read are many years out of date. Perhaps the bullock drays that don’t get to your parts very often.

  • 3524
    Oakeshott Country
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    JM
    Your getting your insights (including Labor strategy) from the Parkes repeater of 2GB, Correct?

  • 3525
    1934pc
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    JM

    it’s that it just doesn’t make sense that Labor is so high

    With NO policies and a piss poor LOTO, it makes no sense that the Libs are AHEAD!.

  • 3526
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    frednk – what parody? I don’t see the need for medicare, and I have been told of schools that had poorly built canteens and halls, some even without doors. The pink batts were a fiasco, a fatal fiasco at that. Labor thought that they could just throw money at these schemes, without even overlooking them. We have heaps of illegals here now, many of who get entitlements that the average Australian doesn’t, and live off of the taxpayer. Labor also seem to just think that there’s an endless supply of money. They don’t live in the real world.

  • 3527
    1934pc
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    JM

    1934 – and you would know this, how?

    Logic and common sense, which you appear to lack!.

  • 3528
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    To be honest, the one that SA Labor should fear most as potential Lib leader is Steven Marshall, the member for Norwood (Dunstan as of the next election). A young, popular moderate from an inner Adelaide seat (not hills or country) – who could be quite instrumental in getting votes from Adelaide voters (where the Libs seem to be struggling) and younger voters.

    He was recently elected deputy, which was an obvious move to start grooming him. But it’s likely his supporters want him to demonstrate he can re-win his seat first, so he probably won’t be elected leader until after the election (assuming they lose and he retains his seat)

  • 3529
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    JM,

    What about dialysis machines?

  • 3530
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Funny how Labor supporters go on about how this AWU affair happened years ago, and thereby it’s redundant, and we should move on. Yet they talk about something that Abbott is ALLEGED to have done (not proven, like Gillard) 35 years ago. Double standards much?

  • 3531
    J M
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    I watch a lot of of political shows on tv.

    1934 – that is all? Wishful thinking on your part.

  • 3532
    1934pc
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    JM

    Once a thug always a thug!.

  • 3533
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    I think JM is GP. It is still schools hols, isn’t it?

  • 3534
    Fran Barlow
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    GG

    In the end the Greens and their fellow travellers have abrogated their responsibilities and will deliver a far worse outcome on this issue ...

    Laughable. All the outcomes on offer were irredeemably bad. There never was a plausible option, and if we’d sided with “Malaysia” we would (quite rightly) have been rejected by those possessed of an insistent regard for social justice and seen as having nothing more impressive than the now (deservedly) defunct Democrats.

    Just as importantly, left-of-centre voters everwhere would have been disenfranchised and challenged to go back to the drawing board and start afresh on building a party committed to equity, social justice, environmental sustainability and peace.

    I’m glad my party saw that and rejected the bullying. However we fare in the election to come, our party will have remained true to its principles and standing in solidarity with the vulnerable of our region. A party that doesn’t blink when under pressure is one that retains the possibility of shaping the polity around its vision.

  • 3535
    Toorak Toff
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    orats. He’s a Port Adelaide man who’s at every Norwood Football Club function. He will bolt in next election. Dunstan will become a safe Liberal seat, just as Playford is a safe Labor seat. How anomalous

  • 3536
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    The Advertiser article also says NSD could “enter Parliament as an independent and be drafted into Cabinet US-style”.

    US style is having a cabinet that isn’t a part of parliament, the nominations to which are approved by parliament, something which the government does not have the constitutional authority to do.

    Adding independents to cabinet isn’t something that only happens in the US. In fact it is precedented in SA, under the previous Premier, Mike Rann. Who appointed Nationals MP Karlene Maywald as Water Minister and Rory McEwen for various ministries (both retained their positions after the 2006 election when the government had a comfortable majority)

  • 3537
    confessions
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    I think JM is GP.

    Nah, it’s ShowsOn.

    Remember his last alter-ego attempt, ‘Greentard’?

  • 3538
    Toorak Toff
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Should have read:

    Agree, Corey Moore. Marshall is as cunning as one of those rats. He’s a Port Adelaide man who’s seen at every Norwood FC function. He will bolt in next election. Dunstan will be a safe Liberal seat, just as Playford is a safe Labor seat. How anomalous!

  • 3539
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    I agree Marshall will probably retain Norwood (Dunstan) but, considering it was held by the ALP prior to the last election, there’s still a long way to go before it can be called a safe Liberal seat.

  • 3540
    This little black duck
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    Tony Abbott is not quite Lance Armstrong: Lance Armstrong has at least one son …

  • 3541
    This little black duck
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    Tony Abbott is not quite Lance Armstrong: Lance Armstrong has at least one son …

  • 3542
    Wakefield
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    Carey – no trouble having an independent in cabinet – but its not US-style. Suggestions of a scenario where NSD gets elected as a Lib sponsored independent?

  • 3543
    Toorak Toff
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    Fran Barlow’s comments remind me of Gough Whitlam’s remark:

    [Only the impotent are pure].

  • 3544
    briefly
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who doubts that climate change is real and is affecting the economy needs look no further than the Roei Abalone Fishery in Western Australia.

    Roe’s abalone live on the inshore reefs that are scattered along the WA coast. Historically, the population has been distributed in clusters from far-western South Australia to the Zuytdorp Cliffs, north of Kalbarri. The commercial and recreational taking of this species has been tightly regulated for decades by the WA Fisheries Department.

    Despite controls in place to prevent over-fishing and illegal fishing, the total population, geographic distribution and commercial value of this species has declined very markedly over the last 20-odd years. These declines are entirely due to climatic and oceanographic events. The most profound of these events are almost certainly driven by climate change.

    The first major environmental event occurred in the early 1990′s when about 3/4 of the roei population in the “northern” zone – from Kalbarri through to the Cliffs – was destroyed during a La Nina event. A combination of sustained, very low tides and very hot air temperatures combined to kill the population that lived on the top of the reef shelf.

    This initial kill may or may not have been directly attributable to climate change, but in any case the northern zone population recovered only very slowly over the following 20 years, and commercial fishing never approached its former levels. It is probable that the very slow recovery from this event is at least partly attributable to environmental change – to the incidence of higher-than-normal water temperatures since the initial kill.

    In the first quarter of 2011, an unprecedented marine heatwave occurred along the WA coast, extending more than 2,000km, from as far north as Shark Bay to the South-western capes of WA.

    The water temperatures were elevated by between 2 and 4 degrees above their normal summertime maxima for around 10 weeks. In the Kalbarri/Zuytdorp region, among other impacts, the higher water temperatures completely destroyed the roei abalone population. Surveys by experienced fishermen with many decades of accumulated local knowledge and the WA Fisheries Department have since confirmed that the population has totally disappeared. This represents a loss of 2/9ths of the original commercial take of roei abalone.

    In addition to the destruction that occurred on the northern coast, there was evidence of abalone destruction elsewhere, including locations near Geraldton and Jurien Bay, and in the Metropolitan fishery.

    The Metropolitan fishery experienced destruction of significant numbers of larger-sized (more commercially-valuable) abalone. Though this escaped public attention in 2011, the population of abalone in the Metropolitan fishery was in such poor condition following the heatwave that commercial production was suspended until the end of 2011.

    It was expected that by late 2011/early 2012 the Metropolitan fishery would have recovered enough for normal commercial fishing to resume. The roei population has exhibited a very high degree of resilience for many decades – especially on the reefs near Perth, which is exceptionally favourable habitat for roei – and usually could have been counted on to “bounce back” following the seasonal winter break to fishing.

    But in fact, while the general health of the population had recovered to some degree by the end of 2011, the destruction of larger abalone during the heatwave and the failure of the remaining population to resume their normal growth meant that the value of commercial production fell significantly.

    The Metropolitan fishery largely failed to produce its usual mix of high-value, larger-sized abalone. While most of the commercial quota was fished for 2011/12, the commercial results clearly show the fishery had not recovered from the 2011 heatwave.

    The new commercial fishing season legally commenced on 1 April, 2012. Historically, fishing is permitted to occur reasonably freely until winter weather sets in and brings fishing to a natural halt. However, in 2012, after a few days fishing, the decision was taken to postpone fishing until the end of 2012.

    This decision was taken because even though the fishery had been “rested” the “quality” of the fish-able population had failed to fully recover. In the event, the commercial fishing that has occurred since October 2012 has been unusually poor. Catches are again down (even form their 2001 levels) and the size/condition of the catch is such that fishing will again almost certainly have to be curtailed.

    As well, we can now also observe some other changes that have been influencing roei fishing in the last few months. First, we have had an extremely prolonged – you can say unprecedented – spell of high inshore swells. Usually, in the period from October through to end January, we should expect to have 15-25 good fishing days (days with inshore swells below 1 metre) and another 15-25 just-workable days (days with swells from 1-1.5 metres). The rest of the time, we would expect the swells to be too rough for fishing.

    Since October 2012 until today there have been 2 “good” days and 12 “just-workable” days. This is unheard-of. There is almost no doubt at all that unfavourable fishing conditions alone mean the commercial catch will not be taken this year. This has never occurred before.

    This swell pattern is entirely driven by a seemingly endless series of intense storms in the mid-Indian Ocean that have been driving conditions in WA coastal waters. The long range forecast is for these swells to continue. The inference is that unprecedented high-energy weather systems over the ocean are changing coastal water patterns right along the WA coast.

    To make matters even more difficult for commercial roei abalone fishers, the water temperatures along the coast have been rising again. In the waters off the Perth coast, they are now around 24 degrees. When the sea is this warm, even roei abalone cannot grow.

    Abalone have quite high metabolic rates. A large part of their body-weight is muscle – the edible muscle they use to attach themselves to the rocks on which they live, and to grab hold of their food supply, passing floating algae. To metabolise effectively – and to grow and prepare for spawning – abalone need a good supply of oxygen-dense water. As the temperature of the water increases, so the levels of dissolved oxygen fall. As water temperatures remain higher for longer, we should expect to see fewer large abalone and more small ones, which is exactly what we are seeing.

    It is quite obvious that through 2012 and into 2013 the roei abalone population has failed to thrive. The total number of abalone is large – considered to be very large by researchers employed by the WA Fisheries Department. But individual abalone are not growing at anything like their usual rate. This is obvious to anyone who handles abalone and has the chance to inspect them in the shell.

    The combined consequences of these influences is the 2012/13 commercial quota will not be able to be fully taken. Furthermore, fishing in the 2013/14 season will not be able to commence in April as in the past. Production will inevitably be postponed again until the end of 2013 or even early 2014.

    It is important to note again that these effects are not being driven by excess or illegal fishing effort. They are not the consequence of management failure or irresponsible fishing practices. They are being driven by environmental factors – by changes in oceanographic conditions that affect literally trillions of cubic metres of sea water. These changes are occurring without warning and in ways that – so far – seem impossible to adapt to.

    At present we can say that changes to the quantity and composition of the catch, and the effects of competition from other substitutes, have reduced the value of roei production by about 80-85% or possibly more.

    A once-valuable commercial and recreational fishery is in danger of being wiped out on the West Coast. Changes on the South Coast are occurring more slowly, but there is no doubt they are taking place there too. There are similar anecdotal reports from abalone fisheries in Eastern Tasmania.

    As well, it is worth noting that there have been a series of years when the WA Rock Lobster fishery has failed to follow the patterns of the previous roughly-100 years of commercial fishing. The lobster have just “disappeared” at times when they would usually be abundant. Their numbers and behaviours have changed abruptly, seemingly for no reason.

    Roei abalone are not particularly important in the scheme of things. Production was never huge. But they are not migratory. They populate and re-populate the same reef systems over and over. What has happened is that system-wide events have changed conditions on individual reefs. And the changes have been large enough and quick enough to destroy marine species, including abalone, various algae and the micro-organisms that depend on them. We are seeing irrevocable change in the reef habitats of the WA coast.

    If this is not destructive climate change, I do not know what is. Sadly, for WA, this is just the beginning.

    http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n1/full/nclimate1627.html

  • 3545
    frednk
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    JM
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    frednk – what parody? I don’t see the need for medicare, and I have been told of schools that had poorly built canteens and halls, some even without doors
    ....

    And now you have started repeating 2GB rantings, boring a complete waste of time.

    Think I will have a look at twitter, see how old the stories are that “Labor Dirt” is linking to, nothing from the 50′s yet.

    Might be an interesting troll, something more entertaining than 2GB rehash.

    Come on guys, school halls, pink bats and AWU have been done to death, come up with something new.

  • 3546
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Fran,

    The Greens policy on AS is akin to building a train track to the edge of a cliff without thinking through the implications of where that means the train is going.

    Toot! Toot! Greens. Make sure you punch your ticket on the Oblivion Express.

  • 3547
    ajm
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    The reason why people confidently say they know the mood of the electorate from talking to people (and get it totally wrong) is because we all talk mainly to like minded people and other in our own fairly narrow social millieu.

    I recommend handing out HTVs for your favourite political party for the WHOLE DAY on election day just once in your life. Because most people do obey the law and vote, you will see the full horror of our society pass before your eyes (or at least as much as live in the vicinity of that polling place – so pick a pretty average suburb).

    After that you will never be surprised by any twist or turn in political outcomes.

    If the polls are picking up a pretty even contest, those votes on both sides will be happening somewhere and barring some huge distortions enough seats will change hands both ways to reflect the overall vote pretty closely.

    Alaos, quite a large proportion of the population moves house between elections, so the composition of the roll is quite different from the previous election. Although the fact that particular demographics stick to the same areas moderates this effect, there still remains the possibility of quite large changes in particular seats even if every person votes the same way they did last time.

    All that is a convoluted way of saying that the polls are usually pretty right as it gets close to the election date. Before that, most people hear the voting question as “Who won the popularity contest last week?”

  • 3548
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Carey – no trouble having an independent in cabinet – but its not US-style. Suggestions of a scenario where NSD gets elected as a Lib sponsored independent?

    She runs for a seat and the voters vote for her?

  • 3549
    confessions
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    briefly:

    Quite so. As you said the other day, there are so many indicators of global warming in WA, it’s hard to know where to start in listing them all.

  • 3550
    psyclaw
    Posted Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Well done most PBers.

    Stray animals that are fed keep on keeping on.

    Don’t feed ‘em and they go elsewhere.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...