<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReachTEL: 53-47 to Labor in Victoria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: absolutetwaddle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1529888</link>
		<dc:creator>absolutetwaddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1529888</guid>
		<description>Remember the new rule of political reportage in this country - the &#039;faceless men&#039; only &#039;plot&#039; to &#039;topple&#039; (or &#039;stab in the back&#039;) an &#039;elected leader&#039; if they&#039;re Labor.

If they&#039;re Liberal it&#039;s just an informal pep-talk among like-minded gentlemen. Nothing to see here! Stalinism? You surely jest, we wear blue ties!:D

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/lift-your-game-or-youre-gone-liberals-told-ted-baillieu/story-e6frgczx-1226565486462</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the new rule of political reportage in this country &#8211; the &#8216;faceless men&#8217; only &#8216;plot&#8217; to &#8216;topple&#8217; (or &#8216;stab in the back&#8217;) an &#8216;elected leader&#8217; if they&#8217;re Labor.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re Liberal it&#8217;s just an informal pep-talk among like-minded gentlemen. Nothing to see here! Stalinism? You surely jest, we wear blue ties!:D</p>
<p><a href="http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/lift-your-game-or-youre-gone-liberals-told-ted-baillieu/story-e6frgczx-1226565486462" rel="nofollow">http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/lift-your-game-or-youre-gone-liberals-told-ted-baillieu/story-e6frgczx-1226565486462</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Fumbles McStupid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1529251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Fumbles McStupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1529251</guid>
		<description>I am beginning to think Baillieu Govt has got to the too little - too late stage re policies and initiatives.

The recent Premiers Economic Statement - Not Treasury/Finance, but that is a little side issue - is not altogether too bad but it too little and less than 2 years out from the election  too late in the piece.

I think the problem to regaining some ground will be that the switched off nature of the electorate that no messages will get through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to think Baillieu Govt has got to the too little &#8211; too late stage re policies and initiatives.</p>
<p>The recent Premiers Economic Statement &#8211; Not Treasury/Finance, but that is a little side issue &#8211; is not altogether too bad but it too little and less than 2 years out from the election  too late in the piece.</p>
<p>I think the problem to regaining some ground will be that the switched off nature of the electorate that no messages will get through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynchpin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527903</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynchpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527903</guid>
		<description>I have just read the JWS polling detailed in the AFR. Has anyone commented on the likely MOE?

If it is accurate it does confirm my gut feel that the ALP is in trouble in NSW because of the ICAC stuff, Robertson&#039;s inability to gain traction and NSW&#039;s still seeing ALP as on the nose. In addition O&#039;Farrell has been careful not to frighten the horses.

The NSW position will make it very difficult for ALP to retain office federally this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read the JWS polling detailed in the AFR. Has anyone commented on the likely MOE?</p>
<p>If it is accurate it does confirm my gut feel that the ALP is in trouble in NSW because of the ICAC stuff, Robertson&#8217;s inability to gain traction and NSW&#8217;s still seeing ALP as on the nose. In addition O&#8217;Farrell has been careful not to frighten the horses.</p>
<p>The NSW position will make it very difficult for ALP to retain office federally this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527570</guid>
		<description>Oh, I meant to make the point that there doesn&#039;t seem to be an anti-Baillieu element, as there was an anti-Brumby element in 2010, its more the Government as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I meant to make the point that there doesn&#8217;t seem to be an anti-Baillieu element, as there was an anti-Brumby element in 2010, its more the Government as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527565</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527565</guid>
		<description>I guess the Coalition&#039;s poor showing is too consistant to really be surprised about it these days, but I am curious where these swings are, maybe in regional areas again. There is general unhappiness with what the Government is doing, and I don&#039;t think the &quot;blame the Feds&quot; position is going to be as successful as they hope, even in a federal election year... and BBP, thousands of people are away from home at the best of times. I know at my house the flow of people is a bit all-over-the-place, with night-shifts, University timetables, band trips, friends, shopping, overtime, etc. Its not rare, and not isolated to public holidays.

That said, I&#039;m dissappointed that they don&#039;t have a &quot;don&#039;t know this person&quot; collumn like they had for Qld, it would be enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the Coalition&#8217;s poor showing is too consistant to really be surprised about it these days, but I am curious where these swings are, maybe in regional areas again. There is general unhappiness with what the Government is doing, and I don&#8217;t think the &#8220;blame the Feds&#8221; position is going to be as successful as they hope, even in a federal election year&#8230; and BBP, thousands of people are away from home at the best of times. I know at my house the flow of people is a bit all-over-the-place, with night-shifts, University timetables, band trips, friends, shopping, overtime, etc. Its not rare, and not isolated to public holidays.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m dissappointed that they don&#8217;t have a &#8220;don&#8217;t know this person&#8221; collumn like they had for Qld, it would be enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toorak Toff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527214</link>
		<dc:creator>Toorak Toff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527214</guid>
		<description>Baillieu just snuck in last time.  Victorian Labor, unlike its counterparts in NSW and Queensland, was not that unpopular and was even a bit unlucky to lose last time. That&#039;s the main reason the Labor vote has held up Victoria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baillieu just snuck in last time.  Victorian Labor, unlike its counterparts in NSW and Queensland, was not that unpopular and was even a bit unlucky to lose last time. That&#8217;s the main reason the Labor vote has held up Victoria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackburnpseph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527181</link>
		<dc:creator>blackburnpseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527181</guid>
		<description>I am not disputing that the Baillieu government is not that popular, however it is rather mischievous to carry out such a poll on the Friday night of a long weekend when thousands will be away from home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not disputing that the Baillieu government is not that popular, however it is rather mischievous to carry out such a poll on the Friday night of a long weekend when thousands will be away from home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527139</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527139</guid>
		<description>http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-28/transport-survey-finds-victorians-unhappy-with-the-government/4486914
[Transport survey finds Victorians &#039;unhappy&#039; with the Government
Updated 34 minutes ago

A new survey has found commuters believe the Baillieu Government has failed to make any improvements to Melbourne&#039;s public transport network.

More than 1,000 people were surveyed by the Metropolitan Transport Forum which represents 22 Melbourne municipalities on transport issues.]

See their site
http://www.pt4me2.blogspot.com.au/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-28/transport-survey-finds-victorians-unhappy-with-the-government/4486914" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-28/transport-survey-finds-victorians-unhappy-with-the-government/4486914</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Transport survey finds Victorians 'unhappy' with the Government<br />
Updated 34 minutes ago</p>
<p>A new survey has found commuters believe the Baillieu Government has failed to make any improvements to Melbourne's public transport network.</p>
<p>More than 1,000 people were surveyed by the Metropolitan Transport Forum which represents 22 Melbourne municipalities on transport issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>See their site<br />
<a href="http://www.pt4me2.blogspot.com.au/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pt4me2.blogspot.com.au/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527105</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527105</guid>
		<description>In the paper edition as well as online

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/poll-puts-baillieu-as-a-sure-loser-20130127-2deyv.html
[Poll puts Baillieu as a sure loser
January 28, 2013
Richard Willingham

PREMIER Ted Baillieu will come under renewed pressure to lift his, and the government&#039;s, performance following a poll that puts the opposition Labor Party in an election-winning position and Labor leader Daniel Andrews as preferred premier.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the paper edition as well as online</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/poll-puts-baillieu-as-a-sure-loser-20130127-2deyv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/poll-puts-baillieu-as-a-sure-loser-20130127-2deyv.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Poll puts Baillieu as a sure loser<br />
January 28, 2013<br />
Richard Willingham</p>
<p>PREMIER Ted Baillieu will come under renewed pressure to lift his, and the government's, performance following a poll that puts the opposition Labor Party in an election-winning position and Labor leader Daniel Andrews as preferred premier.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john wright</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2013/01/27/reachtel-53-47-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-1527086</link>
		<dc:creator>john wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=12186#comment-1527086</guid>
		<description>When is the next federal poll?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the next federal poll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blogs.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-23 02:04:13 -->