Now, TPP has not moved but Abbott now “preferred” and all the attention on Abbott’s supposed preferred position.

At the first point we had the sages telling us that the lead in the leadership polls don’t really win elections. That is, discount any lead.

Now, while the Labor 45 is not too flash – but has not moved despite the absolute media saturation of “She’s gone!” stuff, the TPP kind of put to one side as we not look at how “popular” Tony Abbott has become.

So, where are all those sages down playing the leadership figures with the Gillard lead, but not now with with the Abbott lead?

I actually saw someone on twitter who got it right, a right winger who then deleted the tweet earlier tonight. Will keep an eye on that next time and see if its a fluke.

Possum also said earlier trend would indicate 55-45 +/-3%. He was spot on.

We did work with them at the time of the Vietnam Moratorium and Anti-Apartheid Campaign.

The Victorian Vietnam Moratorium executive consisted of Albert Langer (Maoist), Jean McLean (ALP extreme left), Harry van Moorst (independent Trot), Sam Goldbloom (ALP, but a secret communist) and Bernie Taft (CPA). Taft, a lifelong communist, trained in Beijing, was always the most sensible and moderate of the group. Note that three of the five were Jewish – this was before the left managed to drive the Jewish community into the arms of the Liberals through its support for the PLO.

I thought Van Moorst was more of an anarchist.
What is your source about Sam Goldbloom?

Boost for split from Labor.

I saw that tweet also. I reckon it was a fluke.

Lol. Matty spoilt his lucky guess by coming back later the same night and changing to 56-44

Could it be this Leroy ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB_TM5AvJP0