Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

ReachTEL: ABC, republicanism, Cosgrove v Bryce

ReachTEL gives both sides of the argument something to go on in relation to ABC bias, and finds evidence of conservatism on matters vice-regal and republican.

User login status :

Share

The Fairfax papers today offer three attitudinal findings from a ReachTEL automated phone poll, which was conducted on Thursday evening from a sample of 2146 respondents:

• After Tony Abbott’s efforts to place the matter on the agenda earlier this week, a question on ABC bias finds 59.6% of respondents saying there is none. However, conservative critics of the public broadcaster can at least point to the fact that many more think it biased to Labor (32.2%) than the Coalition (8.2%). While the result at both ends may have been influenced by Abbott’s activism, it nonetheless offers an interesting supplement to the yearly ABC-commissioned Newspoll surveys, which consistently find overwhelming majorities considering its reporting to be “balanced and even-handed” without probing into respondents’ partisanship. The Sydney Morning Herald’s graphic features breakdowns by age and gender.

• Support for republicanism appears to be at a low ebb, with 39.4% in favour and 41.6% opposed. Tellingly, the 18-34 cohort joins 65-plus in recording a net negative rating (though by a considerably smaller margin), with those in between recording majorities in favour. Age and gender breakdowns here.

• There’s also a question on who is preferred out of the incumbent Governor-General and her designated successor, with 57.1% favouring Peter Cosgrove versus 42.9% for Quentin Bryce. I do wonder though about a method which requires a definite answer from all respondents to such a question, given the number that wouldn’t have an opinion.

UPDATE: And now a further finding from the poll that 52.5% agree that Labor should distance itself from the union movement”, compared with 25.6% who disagree.

William Bowe — Editor of The Poll Bludger

William Bowe

Editor of The Poll Bludger

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, is one of the most heavily trafficked forums for online discussion of Australian politics, and joined the Crikey stable in 2008.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from William Bowe

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

1716 comments

1,716 thoughts on “ReachTEL: ABC, republicanism, Cosgrove v Bryce

  1. davidwh

    Depends on how you define “stop the boats”.

    Does it mean no boats for a defined period of time? If so what timeframe?

    If arrivals are slowed to trickle does that equal “stop the boats”.

    Is a boat intercepted and returned stopped?

    How do you prove a negative?

    Few people care at the level we PB’ers get hung up on things political. I think the average Joe will be happy if an occasional boat arrives and the poor refugees are sent off to PNG or Naru never to be seen again.

  2. zoidlord

    @MTBW/1613

    Which is normally the case, when on Welfare.

  3. MTBW

    Simone Katich

    Smiley face 😆

  4. MTBW

    Simone

    colon lol colon

  5. triton

    Christine Fyffe is deputy speaker and Labor’s preferred choice. Napthine would be tempted to give Labor an “up yours” and pick someone else, but the last thing he wants in an election year is more chaos in parliament because of an unpopular speaker.

    A tweet said that Fyffe was a “no show” (in the House I guess). Not sure what that means.

  6. zoomster

    Importantly, too, there has been over $1 billion of government money invested in the irrigation system over the last few years — which was largely aimed providing fruit growers with certainty.

    There are few other irrigation dependent farms up there which can generate anything like the revenue.

  7. zoidlord

    @dave/1617

    How do you prove anything with a ‘cone of silence’?

    Oh regarding the occasional boat arrivals allowed through, quiet a few riots happened during Howard Era at Detention Centres.

  8. Boerwar

    mb

    I am curious. Have you spoken with anyone who has regular contact with Indonesians and/or has(d) business with Indonesians?

  9. mikehilliard

    Journos getting stuck into Boxhead on 24 over SPC

  10. Boerwar

    mb

    How would you rate the Abbott Government’s performance to date in relation to climate action?

  11. guytaur

    Corman showing signs of the cut and run syndrome

  12. Psephos

    [I think the average Joe will be happy if an occasional boat arrives and the poor refugees are sent off to PNG or Naru never to be seen again.]

    I think that’s correct, but nevertheless Abbott did say (many times) that he would stop the boats, not “reduce the number of boats.”

    I think the key criterion is not in fact the number of boats, but the number of people. How many people who set out from Indonesia by boat has the government been forced to accept custody of? Was it less in January than in December? Was it less than January last year? These are the facts we need to have to judge whether this government is succeeding where the last government failed.

  13. zoomster

    …and, of course, giving an aquaculture business in Tasmania money to upgrade their infrastructure so that they can create 100 jobs makes a mockery of the government’s refusal to do the same for SPC and save 5000.

    We really are talking about the future of a whole community here. It’s not the same as shutting down a factory in suburbia.

    For starters, people won’t be able to afford to move – their house values will have already plummetted.

    Towns like this, which once had employment and purpose, where people can’t move away, become rural slums. The human suffering is immense, and can last for generations – look at some of the old SECC towns in the LaTrobe valley to see what happens.

  14. guytaur

    Awwww ABC cut and runs

  15. zoidlord

    @Psephos/1628

    Your ignoring a key part of which is extreme weather makes it’s difficult to get to Australia in the first place.

  16. Centre

    If I was holding Coca-Cola Amatil stocks, I’d want my board to tell Abbott to go and get fuacked.

    The company loses millions and millions of shareholder money by keeping SPC Ardmona afloat year on year.

    Enough is enough!

    If it’s tuff titties for the Australian economy – too bad, so sad, shareholder money more important.

    Gee that’s why the big players are going short on Australian stocks – the demise of their manufacturing industry under their newly elected government they say.

  17. mari

    https://twitter.com/JonathanLaNauze/status/430459972510420992/photo/1

    I guess this has been posted (have been down on the beach so not sure)

  18. mari

    https://twitter.com/JonathanLaNauze/status/430459972510420992/photo/1

    I guess this has been posted (have been down on the beach so not sure)

  19. Simone Katich

    poroti, i dont make judgement on the worth of the amount of redundancy….only to say I would expect any regional/rural employees to have above award redundancy (similar for unskilled). I was merely pointing out that with above award redundancy the hit to the budget of staff going onto unemplyment benefits would be delayed.

  20. citizen

    Hockey’s “end of the age of entitlement” does not apply to Costello:

    [Former Howard government treasurer Peter Costello has been confirmed as the new chair of the Future Fund, as flagged by The Australian Financial Review

    “Mr Costello’s unique experiences and background at the most senior levels in government and in business will be a great asset to the Future Fund Board,” Treasurer Joe Hockey and Finan Senator Cormann said in a statement.]

    http://www.afr.com/p/national/costello_confirmed_as_future_fund_eDiT4ne12LftU6hWq5W9hO

    How many “jobs for the boys” appointments has Costello received now?

  21. Centre

    Qantas will be next 😎

    If you think Abbott doesn’t know what he’s doing with SPC, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

  22. zoomster

    Simone

    From personal experience (having received an inheritance) there’d be a 13 week delay before they were paid benefits.

  23. Psephos

    [You’re ignoring a key part of which is extreme weather makes it difficult to get to Australia in the first place.]

    This is certainly a relevant factor. Has the weather in the relevant area been worse since October? Has it been worse than in the same period last year? I don’t know.

  24. Centre

    Rates on HOLD

    As expected!

  25. guytaur

    “@abcnews: #BREAKING: The Reserve Bank has left official interest rates on hold at a record low 2.5 per cent. #interestrates #RBA #finance #auspol”

  26. kakuru

    [An example of the steady driving I think Abbott is doing

    @702sydney: BREAKING- A car is on the beach at #Bondi after crashing and coming down the hill]

    More like Turnbull. It’s his electorate.

  27. zoidlord

    @Psephos/1639

    I don’t believe Science is a forte of current Coalition Government 😛

    It’s also very hard to tell, with the Cone of Silence hovering over our heads…

  28. guytaur

    @ChifleyResearch: Barnaby Joyce is fighting for a $7B rural bank. Here’s the bizarre part – one already exists: http://t.co/Vw44FU20Vt #auspol

  29. guytaur

    “@latikambourke: RBA ‘Growth in wages has declined noticeably.’”

  30. rossmcg

    It’s a bit touch for Tory MPs to be drawing attention to allowances in the SPC EBA. 58c an hour for providing your own wet gear! how much to Tone spend to go to weddings, take part in charity bike rides, promote books and do countel

  31. Boerwar

    mb

    [But I also think that, all in all, they are governing a bit better than they are coming across as doing: nothing has gone seriously wrong yet in a policy sense…]

    Really? So, how is the Abbott Government with climate action ‘in a policy sense’:

    (1) Cut funding for the DAP. Five months in, there is absolutely NO action arising from the DAP. The stated target of 5% by 2020 is unachievable except possibly through purchase of foreign carbon credits which they have previously scoffed at.
    (2) Remove climate considerations from the TOR of Infrastructure Australia.
    (3) Do not turn up at international climate negotiations.
    (4) Destroy the Climate Commission.
    (5) Threaten previously bipartisan commitment to RETs. The RET review to be chaired by Moran, noted climate denialist.
    (6) Immediately following government receipt of a report into the health impacts of wind farms, order a new investigation without making public the findings of the first report.
    (7) Approve the world’s biggest coal export port.
    (8) Use chair position on G20 to cut climate action out of the agenda.
    (9) Remove all foreign aid for international climate programs.
    (10) Blame every last little thing on the carbon tax.
    (11) Maintain public silence on vitriolic and manic denialist sprays by climate nutters such as Abbott’s hand-picked business adviser, Maurince Newman.
    (12) Engage in political witch hunt on insulation scheme that delivered insulation to 1 million homes and which has been a significant player in reducing electricity demand.
    (13) Destroy agency and funding which was demonstrating consistent success in enabling companies to reduce carbon emissions.

  32. mikehilliard

    davidwh

    Rates on hold so no month off PB. 🙂

  33. rossmcg

    It’s a bit rich for Tory MPs to be drawing attention to allowances in the SPC EBA. 58c an hour for providing your own wet gear! how much did Tone spend to go to weddings, take part in charity bike rides, promote books and do countless other things that have been kept secret from us. These people are so divorced from the reality of the shop floor …

  34. Boerwar

    agency in (13) = Clean Energy Finance Corporation.

  35. Boerwar

    It is the historical destiny of the Abbott Government to destroy Australia’s middle class.

    Enjoy.

  36. Simone Katich

    zoomster,

    IYO how far can Sharman push her dissension? Who has more to lose here, her or the government?

    Is she dissenting merely to maintain respect in her electorate or is she doing it to gain concessions from the government? Or – more to the point, will her electorate expect that she will get concessions in order to maintain their vote?

    ohhhhh i find this one very interesting! Far more so than the Malcolm and ETS fizzer.

  37. guytaur

    “@J_C_Campbell: Christine Fyffe will be the new Speaker. #springst”

  38. zoidlord

    @guytaur/1645

    Part time jobs increase imho, which reduces wages.

    I talked about this little while ago.

    some info:
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-12/australia-casual-workforce-masking-unemployment-figures/4749900

  39. Bushfire Bill

    [Relax children. Newspoll and Nielsen will be back soon enough. I don’t think they are going to be terrific for the Coalition.

    Which is odd considering that they haven’t been governing that badly and seem to have actually managed to stop the boats.]

    The Boats issue is a big deal for those who follow the kabuki theater of politics: politicians, journalists and commentators.

    To the average man in the street it’s not such a big deal.

    Sure, if asked, Joe and Jane Bloggs will offer an opinion one way or the other, but its not foremost in their mind.

    Time after time “issues” polls show this.

    Boats, like the Carbon Tax, was an artificial issue, invented to provide endless fodder for political chatterers.

    It’s like those Japanese game shows that Clive Jame pioneered the analysis of: it’s easy to get a whole bunch of viewers, perhaps even a nation, fascinated by who can bear to swim through a pool full of pig shit… but whoever wins the race, it doesn’t amount to anything significant in the national discourse, and it doesn’t imply that a contestant agonizing over swimming through pig shit is anything but an invented crisis.

    Boats, the Carbon Tax and swimming through pig shit provide entertainment and something to talk about in the newspapers and on TV. Nothing much more than that.

    They do not put bread on the table, uniforms on schoolkids’ backs, make the internet run any faster, bring down the price of petrol, end the drought, save the Murray (or the reef, or Great white sharks), rein in cheating financial advisors, pay pensions or provide universal health care. We even had one Coalition dropkick screaming that Boat People were the cause of traffic jams on the M4. It may have given the tradies on the M4 – who ere the real blockers of that motorway – some comfort to be able to blame someone they regarded as “lesser” than themselves, but that didn’t make the accusation true, or even remotely significant.

    The Ray Hadleys of this world would have us believe that Boats is an issue that DOES affect real life. Hadley’s “Police Blotter” segment every day is replete with “men of Middle Eastern appearance” forcing themselves on young girls, uni students and spitting in the streets like the filthy dogs they are. But polls tell us repeatedly that the punters, in overwhelming numbers, don’t believe Boats, and the people who come on them, are that important to their daily lives.

    Which is why, even if Abbott does succeed in stopping the boats, without serious collateral damage to our relationship with Indonesia, and without seriously degrading our notions internation humanitarian standing (iffy, if you ask me), ultimately “Boats” as an issue, even as a solved issue will be dismissed. The question will then be, “What’s your next trick?”.

    By getting rid of Boats as an issue, Abbott is getting rid of one of his most important political pluses, but it’s only a plus – a real and meaningful plus – with the rabbits that chew the political grass on panel shows and current affairs programs, in in op-ed political columns.

    He’d be far wiser to try to string it out for as long as he can, but he’s desperate to claim at least one promise kept, even if that promise is almost entirely irrelevant to the punters daily lives.

    The pundits and press gallery hacks, the insiders and the glitterati can interview each other to their hearts’ content, but stopping the Boats still won’t be as wildly electorally successful as Abbott seems to hope it will be.

    He’s trying to act unfazed about his poll position at the moment. But I’d bet London to a brick that inside he’s seething with rage that an ungrateful public could abandon him so quickly after his moment of glory.

    If Abbott truly believes that stopping the Boats will revive his prospects, he’s in for a rude shock. He’s been hated all his life for the bovver boy he is. He craves popularity. He’s been promised it, yet the polls aren’t delivering.

    No Shanahan article, or Sheridan paen of praise, no Hadley editorial and certainly no Kenny or Hartcher man-love op-ed will make Abbott someone who is liked and admired by the general public.

    It is partly because he is plain un-likeable, a vicious thug who goes the biff first and asks questions later, and partly because he’s picked the wrong issues to get him to his goal.

    Boats is one of them. The Carbon Tax is another. Australians are not that interested in something that, in the final assessment, doesn’t affect their lives nearly as much as many commentators think they do.

  40. zoomster

    As part of her critique of the SPC decision, Stone outlined where the government was failing —

    [It is a complete furphy what is being said about the troubles of this last fruit preserving industry. Perhaps it’s a distraction from the facts, which would require some government action, like doing better with the anti-dumping regime, like competition and policy – we call it root and branch review – that’s not in place at the moment. Like abolishing the carbon tax, that hasn’t happened yet.]

    http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2013/s3937408.htm

    And, of course, that’s only in the area of industry policy (oh, I forgot: they don’t have one, because Sophie Mirabella refuses to give them her notes ..or something)

  41. ShowsOn

    So according to the government, fruit is bad, but chocolate is good.

  42. imacca

    Well, the Fibs have found a slot for the Hammock Dweller. Jobs for the boys and girls all round under the beneficent gaze of Abbott i guess.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/peter-costello-takes-up-job-as-future-fund-chairman/story-fn59niix-1226817599508#mm-premium

  43. rossmcg

    From Fairfax

    “The intelligence watchdog has criticised ASIO for “inconsistent and arbitrary” practices by denying some refugees legal representation when completing security clearances.
    An inquiry by the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security found ASIO staff were not offering all refugees the right to a lawyer in their interview, based on complaints made by asylum seeker service group.

    The inquiry found ASIO officers had no legal basis to exclude lawyers from interviews. It also recommended visa applicants should be asked beforehand whether they wanted a lawyer present at their interview.”

    So ASIO thinks it is above the law? Well I never would have thought that.

  44. Tricot

    I just noticed someone here has kind of said the LNP is not doing to badly and all they need to do, essentially, “is sell their policies at little better” or wtte.

    Funny – sounds just like an echo chamber for what what said about Labor or nigh on 6 years.

    So, five months in office, with policies “ready to govern” and they have not figured out how to “sell” the policies?

    What a load of rubbish.

    The LNP is still in three word slogan, Opposition mode.

  45. Centre

    Unemployment expected to rise according to the RBA.

    How is the Monkey going to honour his promise to create all those jobs?

  46. ShowsOn

    [Is she dissenting merely to maintain respect in her electorate or is she doing it to gain concessions from the government? Or – more to the point, will her electorate expect that she will get concessions in order to maintain their vote?]
    Doesn’t the factory employ a few thousand people?

    Clearly if the factory closes that will completely kill the economy in hear electorate.

  47. ShowsOn

    [How is the Monkey going to honour his promise to create all those jobs?]
    That promise was a total joke. All he promised was to keep the rate of growth in employment the same as what it has been for the last 6 years.

  48. triton

    I expect Daniel Andrews to take credit for the choice of the new Vic speaker. Something like, “I’m pleased that the premier has taken up my proposal to end the circus, even though it took weeks of unnecessary chaos in parliament before he did so.”

  49. zoidlord

    @Centre/1661

    My take on it, is Abbott got caught up with his own arse for not selling it in the first place – when he refused to sell it to Tony Winsor.

  50. Boerwar

    There was a profound bit of Abbconomis went into that jobs promise.

    The tallied up the jobs gained by Howard and divided by the number of years and Bob’s your uncle: two million jobs over ten years coming up. Thinking about it some more they came up with one million jobs in five years.

  51. MTBW

    kakaru

    [Oh, unless of course you’re a millionaire having a baby. Then Abbott & Hockey will give you $75, no questions asked. But that’s, you know, different.]

    That policy is offensive as well as stupid.

    I noticed yesterday that Roz Packer donated more that half a million to the Liberal Party at the last election.

    She may need that money if any of her and her cohorts children intend to have children.

    The policy is a disgrace.

    Sorry for the delay I had a couple of things I had to do.

  52. Boerwar

    i

    [Jobs for the boys and girls…]

    Apart from Mirabella and possibly Vanstone, all the jobs are going to the boys, I believe.

  53. zoomster

    Simone

    it’s an interesting one, and it seems to be a common occurence with Lib governments. Howard ended up – in his first term – with a handful of ex Lib MPs sitting on the cross benches.

    Partly – as was the case then – the Libs don’t give a toss. Sharman is as ‘wet’ as a modern Lib gets (so not very), a former Turnbull supporter (her career was on a steady rise under Howard/Nelson/Turnbull; she’s gone nowhere since) and one of those dreaded intellectual types who uses facts and things, so they don’t mind if she goes.

    On the other hand, she has one of the safest seats in the country, and has – if anything – made it safer (Murray and Indi are side by side, so that makes comparisons even more interesting).

    If she recontests the next election, she’ll win, no matter what the colour of her livery.

    Abbott is a tad too complacent at present to be worried by the idea that an MP might end up on the cross benches. He’s probably more worried that, should Turnbull ever be in a position to challenge, Stone will back him (and if so, she’ll end up in Cabinet, outranking many of Tony’s present Ministers).

    He’d be wise to look at the past Parliament, and even wiser to look at the ’99 election in Victoria. You can afford to lose a few backbenchers when you have a thumping majority. You’re in trouble if they’re still there when you don’t.

  54. Simon Katich

    ShowsOn,

    A busted local economy (assuming thats what will happen) doesnt mean LNP wont hold it. Aren’t the poorest electorates mostly LNP held ones? Seems to me these electorates already have low expectations from their LNP masters.

  55. Rex Douglas

    I’d suggest the belated resignation of the Victorian Parly Speaker is politically too late for the Govt whose credibility was shot to pieces late last year.

  56. Simon Katich

    zoomster 1669 – thanks. you just made it more interesting.

  57. pom

    The talk about SPC and the job losses will be a small part in the devastation on the catchment area of the workers and farms that will no longer be viable all who will suffer.
    There will be a great many of the workers who will have to move to find jobs. The flow on effect of this will impact on the house/property prices and the long term potential of the area to grow. Schools, Local Council and recreational improvements will all suffer. Then there will be the long lasting impressions of ‘It’s a dieing area to move to’.

  58. Diogenes

    I noted a few days ago that Stone was really angry but this is even better than I had hoped for. 😀

  59. mexicanbeemer

    During lunch break i read a copy of the Herald Sun and i could not find any mention of Stone’s attack on Tone & co, sure the paper went to print after 9.00 last night.

    Very poor effort by the Herald Sun to predict Tone from the bucketing he is copping.

    In other news the RBA note that wages are “notably lower”

    So where is the wage explosion?

  60. MTBW

    Victorian Speaker stepping down.

    Gave a huge blast to Geoff Shaw on the way out.

  61. AussieAchmed

    How is the Monkey going to honour his promise to create all those jobs?

    That’s one massive big Green Army

  62. Darn

    For anyone interested, Sharman Stone will be on 3aw on the Tom Elliott show after 3.00pm today. His promo focussed on the “liar” accusations so it could worth tuning in.

    I just hope she doesn’t start back pedalling or watering it down. This could be very embarrassing for Abbott.

  63. Centre

    Well I don’t think the statement from the RBA is good news.

    They think wages will fall, unemployment will rise – but will not lower rates as it may add to inflationary pressures.

    In effect, the RBA has said we’re not doing anything on monetary policy – they’re going to leave it to the Monkey to fend for himself 😯

    God help us, no!

    The ASX is down further on the realisation that the Monkey is on his own 😥

  64. meher baba

    Psephos, Boerwar and others.

    1) I know (don’t ask me how) that the boats have more or less stopped for now. It is true that we are in the middle of an historically low season for boat arrivals is a good one, but – even taking these seasonal factors into account – I am told that the amount of people smuggler action up north is significantly reducing for now.

    2) This doesn’t mean that the boats have gone away for good, or even for a significant period of time: anybody who claims such a thing is talking through their hat. This was always going to be the problem with any promises to “stop the boats”: I don’t see how it is possible to implement a policy to be sure that they have stopped other than a regional solution combined with a legal framework in Australia which truly ensures that getting on a boat gives you no advantage whatsoever in terms of being settled in Australia.

    3) Re Indonesia and China: I don’t have any access to what the governments of these countries truly think at the moment. Do you? Yes there have been some silly political comments about Japan vs China and people smuggling, not to mention Filipino porn stars. Maybe the appointment of Cosgrove as GG is problematic for Indonesia, although I haven’t seen any signs of this. But our diplomatic relations with these two countries are generally robust enough to withstand some of this sort of pressure. So it’s surely too early to say.

    4) Re climate change policy: I suppose my thinking here is that the Australian people have spoken and they clearly don’t want an emissions trading scheme. Like you, I think they are wrong, but we live in a democracy.

  65. victoria

    In case not already linked, audio of sharman stone on ABC rural radio

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-02-04/5236328#.UvAn2535ttU.twitter

  66. MTBW

    Darn

    Can you give those of us who live in other States a run down of how it goes please.

  67. Centre

    The mail:

    Interest rates to stay on hold for the rest of the year is the most likely scenario.

    *catch u later

  68. victoria

    mexican b

    The strategy of The Herald sun is not to report anything on team Abbott at all

  69. Diogenes

    Why don’t the government buy $25M of shares in SPC? SPC could use the money and if it gets back on its feet the government could get its money back.

  70. victoria

    Darn

    Can you give us a run down if possible? Thanks in advance

  71. Boerwar

    [mb

    [3) Re Indonesia and China: I don’t have any access to what the governments of these countries truly think at the moment. Do you?]

    China no. Indonesia yes. Real damage is being done in business relationships. Totally unreported in the MSM.

    Cf climate change policy, the issue was not whether we live in a democracy. The question is whether the Government is going to deliver on its promise to deliver 5% by 2020. It is apparent that using the entire suite of policy settings available to it, the Government is attempting to kill stone dead any chance that it will deliver on its election promise.

  72. rossmcg

    Interesting that to date the sMH has only published 38 responses go today’s Peter Reith column. Must be some serious moderation going on there.
    I know they won’t publish mine because I point out that apart from his obvious bias, he is a man who has serious questions to answer about his integrity.
    Hardly the ideal type for a regular column in a newspaper that promotes its independence.

  73. WeWantPaul

    [Why don’t the government buy $25M of shares in SPC? SPC could use the money and if it gets back on its feet the government could get its money back.]

    I agree with the idea but the shares should be at a discount such that the other shareholders and directors feel pain.

  74. AussieAchmed

    THE powerful members of the audit commission set up to advise how to slash government spending and jobs have so far cost taxpayers around $1500 a day each.

    That has totalled more than $30,000 in one case, according to calculations based on information from the National Commission of Audit secretariat.
    ——————————–

    Those terrible SPC and car manufacturing workers wanting a wage to support their families….

  75. triton

    Vic parliament is back. I don’t know why Louise Asher is reminding the ALP of its previous support for Fyffe. It’s as though she doesn’t expect their support now.

  76. triton

    As the only nominee Fyffe is Speaker without a vote.

  77. Boerwar

    Coca Cola Amatil, with a market capitalisation of around $66 billion (I presume a bit less after today’s ASX bloodbath), owns SPC.

    For the Government to purchase 25% of SPC, Coke would have to hive it off as a separate business and roll out an IPO.

    The punters in general have IPO fatigue ATM, the business is on a long-term declining trend, and without the ready access to Coke’s capital warchest, would have little access to the kind of capital needed to modernise the plant and equipment.

    In any case, apart from Joyce who wants us to buy 10% of Australia’s least profitable farms, this is not exactly a socialist government.

  78. meher baba

    BW@1686: I’ll take your word for it re Indonesia. If true, it would be disturbing some of the business backers of the Libs (although see my earlier post in which I pointed out that the Libs these days are increasingly the political party of “lazy” investors in mining and property rather than the promoters of the sort of entrepreneurial types trying to build up trade with our near neighbours.

    Re the promise to deliver 5% emissions cuts by 2020: I doubt that the Abbott Government sees that as a promise for which the constituency they pitch to will try to hold them to account.

    Leaving all of this to one side, I was never trying to set myself up to defend Abbott and his mob. I wasn’t trying to say that they were doing a great job, merely that they are coming across publicly as being far more disorganised and incompetent than they actually are.

    I think I need to choose my words more carefully next time.

  79. BH

    Joe Ludwig makes some good comment about tge Clean Energy Commission a help for farming
    http://www.chifley.org.au/this-government-truly-cant-see-the-forest-for-the-trees/

    Victoria I’m no fan of Kim Carr but he was baying for bloood with Laws today. He said Sharman Stone was right and that Abbott and Hockey were
    liar. Laws didn’t like that but Carrdidn’t back down.

    When Carr finished Laws said he would ring Abbott to see how he felt about being called a liar. Said it was a lack of respect for the PM of the country at which stage I fell about screaming.

    Judith Sloan, his favourite, rang in to contradict Carr and Stone so I switched off.

  80. autocrat

    rossmcg
    [Interesting that to date the sMH has only published 38 responses go today’s Peter Reith column. Must be some serious moderation going on there.
    I know they won’t publish mine because I point out that apart from his obvious bias, he is a man who has serious questions to answer about his integrity.
    Hardly the ideal type for a regular column in a newspaper that promotes its independence.]

    Mine was roundly rejected – I suggested Reith could give a reconvened ABCC tips on where to source balaclavas and attack dogs.

  81. zoomster

    meher

    4 may be so (although the polling on this has been very muddled, and there’s little evidence they don’t want an ETS – it’s ‘the carbon tax’ which polls badly) but that doeesn’t mean the government has handled/is handling the issue well.

    There’s a difference between ‘doing what The People want’ and ‘doing what The People want competently’.

    The second is good governance.

    The Coalition created a rod for their own back on this issue. Firstly, they were stupid to stick with Direct Action, which was a bandaid measure slapped together in the context of the 2010 election, and never meant to be a permanent policy. When the ‘carbon tax’ deal was announced, they should have leapfrogged over Labor and the Greens and promised to go straight to an ETS.

    By not doing this, they’ve put themselves in a position where the policy they support is at direct odds with their core beliefs – Direct Action means ‘bigger’ government, picking winners, subsidising private companies, and so on.

    They have also made climate change an issue which will run and run. If they’d gone for an ETS, it’s likely it would be in place now (the Greens and Labor would have looked silly opposing its passage through both Houses). “How we tackle climate change’ would thus be dead as an issue, and the series of hot days we’re experiencing would reinforce that we had a sagacious government who had foreseen the problem and were already acting on it.

    As it is, every spot of peculiar weather will remind people that we don’t have effective action on climate change in place.

    And, of course, Abbott still hasn’t repealed the ‘carbon tax’ – as Sharman Stone pointed out. He’s made some big statements on this (‘Parliament will sit until this is sorted!”) which have proven to be specious. If he keeps trying to get it through with the present unco operative Senate, he keeps the issue – and his inability to do anything about it – alive. If he doesn’t, he’ll be accused of dropping the ball (as Rudd was, in the same circumstance).

    There is also very little evidence that he’s actively trying to build relationships with the incoming Senators to ensure that it’s a done deal (that would be thinking ahead; this government doesn’t do that).

    Come July, Palmer will have him over a barrel. He knows that Abbott has to get the legislation through. He knows that, for it to mean anything real, it has to go through by September (several business groups have said this). It’s in absolutely no one’s interests but the Coalition’s that this legislation sails through the Senate — so it won’t.

    It’s quite likely, therefore, that instead of action on climate change being an issue which could already be done and dusted, we’ll still be discussing it for at least the next six months.

    I’d take a punt and say ‘that’s if the government’s lucky’ — and that many a journo will be recycling their pieces on ‘by Christmas, the government will have in place the first half of the trigger they need for a double dissolution’ and changing the 2013 date to 2014.

  82. bemused

    Diogenes@1686

    Why don’t the government buy $25M of shares in SPC? SPC could use the money and if it gets back on its feet the government could get its money back.

    The $25M goes to the shareholders from whom they purchase the shares on the ASX, unless there is a new issue of shares. A new issue of shares would dilute the value of existing shares.
    Also, SPC AFAIK is not listed so it would be Coca-Cola Amatil shares, part of a much larger entity.

  83. deblonay

    ROW IN THE USA OVER SUPER BOWL ANTHEM
    ____________________
    The singing of “America the Beautiful” in a number of languageson a Coke ad…a pretty ordinary thing …on the TV opening of the Superbowl…has drawn a barrage of attacks from the Tea Party Repugnants and their supporters who say that only Enbglish should have been used…a quite racist attitude and stupid to boot in electoral terms….

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/03/coca-cola-super-bowl-ad-ignites-online-debate/?iref=allsearch

  84. Fran Barlow

    Lizzie

    I would definitely complain in those circumstances, but you have a fair bit to deal with at the moment, so it’s perfectly understandable that you may not be keen.

    Personally, I find making complaints cathartic and they allow me to move on when there’s no more to be done.

  85. davidwh

    Rates on hold means you are all stuck with me for the next month. On the upside that means I have to endure the result of the Griffith by-election 🙂

  86. Puff, the Magic Dragon.

    Abbott must be furious that is once again a woman who is pricking his smelly bubble. 👿

  87. Puff, the Magic Dragon.

    it is

  88. Boerwar

    The vast majority of uniforms never assault anyone. We know that some assault each other. Here’s one who has assaulted a civilian.

    Yet we are supposed to believe that Navy staff would never, every, not in a million years, assault asylum seekers.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/army-captain-on-assault-charge/story-fn59niix-1226817980351

  89. Boerwar

    Deblonay

    The subtext is that spanish speakers, doubled in the US since 1990 is on the way to challenging english as the dominant language in the US.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spanish_in_the_United_States_by_countr.gif

  90. Marty

    New laws in Afghanistan. Good thing we went there to protect women, eh?

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/04/afghanistan-law-victims-violence-women

  91. Boerwar

    Surprise No 98. Despite promising repeatedly to put downwards pressure on the COL before the election and despite promising repeatedly that it was not that the party that increases taxes, the Abbott Government has just quietly pocketed a suite of tax increases on alcohol products.

    Surprise No 99. Despite refusing to support Holden for no reason having to do with awards, and despite refusing to support SPC and despite drawing ‘a line in the sand’ on industry assistance the Abbott Government has announced $16 million for Cadbury’s factory in Tasmania and $3.5 million for SAFCOL in Tasmania.

    The Abbott Government is also providing industry assistance of $420,000,000 to the rural sector. It is also providing billions of dollars in industry assistance to the mining industry by way of fuel excise exemptions.

    Surprises, lies and pathetic excuses abound.

    Abbott and Hockey made up some award conditions that did not exist at SPC and lied to Australians about that. They also reckoned that the Government was not supporting SPC because the existing awards were too generous. But the SPC award conditions are less generous than the Cadbury’s award conditions. Abbott is Margie about it and is trying to pretend that the Cadbury’s sponsorship logo on his taxpayer-funded bike rides has nothing to do with giving free taxpayers’ money to Kraft. Nor has Abbott complained about the generous parliamentary award conditions that he receives on his bike rides. And no-one in the Liberal Party, least of all Unemployment Minister Abetz, appears to give a bugger what the SAFCOL award conditions are.

    The only seriously useful things about this policy shambles have been some rather good stone fruit and cling peach jokes.

  92. Socrates

    Morning all. I am briefly logging in from town since we are still without power for a second day after gale force winds ripped through Adelaide’s eastern suburbs on Monday night.

    I was dismayed to read of this action by Greg Hunt, though pleased to support the Getup campaign against it:
    [
    With the backing of environmentalists and the forestry industry, critical areas of Tasmania’s spectacular forests were officially placed on the World Heritage list in June last year. But if the Abbott Government is successful in its new bid, this could all be taken away. In an extraordinary move, Environment Minister Greg Hunt has submitted a proposal to the World Heritage Committee, seeking to delist Tasmania’s World Heritage forests.

    Call on Minister Hunt to withdraw his proposal, which will strip Tasmania’s forests of their World Heritage status: ]
    https://www.getup.org.au/tas-forests

    Stripping forests like the Tarkine of World Heritage status is a joke, except that Hunt is serious. In fact, sustainable commercial exploitation of world heritage areas is permissible under the WH rules. The reason they want the status revoked is so Tasmanian foresters can go back to clear felling. Shame, Greg Hunt, shame.

  93. Boerwar

    So, first Smithy rips Shawie a new one. So Shawie reckons, right mate, eff you, it’s on. A coupla hours later Shawie rips Smithy, Nappy, and the whole damn Liberal crew a new one.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/geoff-shaw-deals-denis-napthines-liberals-an-electionyear-embarrassment/story-e6frgczx-1226818078975

  94. Socrates

    SPC says Tony Abbott’s claims about their pay and conditions are untrue.
    [SPC Ardmona has hit back at claims by the Prime Minister that its business troubles are due to “extraordinary” workplace conditions, saying the statements are “mistaken and need to be refuted by the facts”.]
    Clearly, Abbott lied when he said SPC was the source of the information.

    Have a good day all. Maybe Abbott will be gone when my lights are switched back on?

  95. Boerwar

    Socrates

    It is important in these matters to get the facts. Like Hunt, the Get Up campaign seems to be misrepresenting what is happening. But lies appear to be the new normal now that the Abbott Government is busy degrading public policy discourse with a constant stream of lies, pathetic excuses, inconsistent decisions, a lack of accountability and a lack of transparency.

    The gist is that Hunt is seeking to delist less than 10% of the Tasmanian World Heritage Area.

    He is not seeking to delist the ‘tall wet forests’ and he is not seeking to delist forests like the ‘Tarkine’.

    Whatever happens the overwhelming majority of the Tarkine will remain listed as will a significant proportion of Tasmania’s tall wet forests.

    Hunt is seeking to delist over 100,000 hectares of World Heritage Area on the basis that it is degraded. He reckons that there are 117 areas that are ‘devastated’.

    (It is interesting that when the Government is lauding the praises of foresty practices, it never, ever uses the term ‘devastating’.”

    But, black is the new white and the area sought to be delisted is ‘devastated’ by forestry.

    But, of the 100,000+ hectares nominated for delisting, only 12,000 hectares has been harvested. This 12,000 hectares is spotted in coupes scattered through the 100,000+ hectares that Hunt is seeking to delist. These coupes would now be a chaos of stumps, charred waste, scattered seed trees, weeds, bare ground and partially silted gullies and streams. Aka ‘devastated’.

    The heritage policy question is, quite simply, this. Is the 100,000+ hectares of world heritage value even if around 10% of it is severely damaged? The World Heritage Committee took the view that the other 90,000 hectares had World Heritage Value and that the 12,000 would regenerate over time. Which they will. It will take around two to five centuries to do so.

    So, it is dead wrong to say that the Abbott Government decision to seek delisting is going to destroy Tasmania’s tall wet forests and the Tarkine forest.

    It is also dead wrong for Hunt to be implying that the entire parcel is devastated and without world heritage values when (a) only about 10% has been logged and will regenerate and (b) the logged coupes do not destroy the surrounding world heritage values and (c) that the parcel as a whole will improve over time as the coupes regenerate.

    BTW, this is another world first for the Abbott Government, because NO government in the world has ever sought to delist a world heritage areaP.

    Neither the Greens nor the Tasmanian Forest Industry Group are supporting the decision. The World Heritage Committee has only recently made the decision that the whole parcel meets world heritage values.

    So, why?

    Firstly, there will be logging contractors who do not support Tasmanian Forest Industry’s stance. These contractors do not get it that to sell Tasmanian quality timber on the international market, the forestry peace deal was a must do. These contractors just want to do what they have always done – get in and make a quid while it lasts. The area sought to be exised has some of Tasmania’s last tall wet forest old growth forest in it and would be worth in the order of hundreds of thousands of dollars a hectare. The game plan would be to delist it from World Heritage, break the forestry peace deal, get in and, in Hunt’s word, ‘devastate’ the joint.

    There are two other straws in the wind. The first is that Abbott promised to this before the election, and we all know how he hates nasty surprises.

    The second is that this is part of a pattern of federal and state Liberal/National Party governments that routinely and rigidly makes any and very decision about the environment a grudging, hedged, or outright destructive decision.

    The inescapable conclusion is that they just hate conserving and protecting the environment.

    Not forgetting their climate theft.

  96. Boerwar

    ffs

  97. billie

    Victoria is set to follow Queensland restricting group protest

    http://www.weareunion.org.au/napthines_silencing_act