<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Poll Bludger &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ACNielsen: 56-44</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/17/acnielsen-56-44-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/17/acnielsen-56-44-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACNielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alannah MacTiernan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Electoral Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest ACNielsen survey of 1400 voters has Labor&#8217;s lead at 56-44, following an aberrant 58-42 result the previous month. Labor leads on the primary vote 46 per cent to 38 per cent. Malcolm Turnbull&#8217;s approval rating is down a point to 31 per cent and his disapproval is steady at 60 per cent, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/environment/global-warming/voters-back-labor-on-emissions-scheme-20090816-emdh.html">ACNielsen survey</a> of 1400 voters has Labor&#8217;s lead at 56-44, following an aberrant 58-42 result the previous month. Labor leads on the primary vote 46 per cent to 38 per cent. Malcolm Turnbull&#8217;s approval rating is down a point to 31 per cent and his disapproval is steady at 60 per cent, which <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/turnbulls-fortunes-fade-pm-rolls-on-unscathed-20090816-emda.html">Tony Wright of The Age</a> notes has him the same territory as Brendan Nelson and Simon Crean in the terminal phase of their leaderships. Peter Costello remains favoured as Liberal leader by 35 per cent, against 19 per cent for Joe Hockey, 17 per cent for Turnbull, 10 per cent for Tony Abbott and 3 per cent for Andrew Robb. Kevin Rudd&#8217;s approval rating is up a point to 68 per cent, against a disapproval rating of 24 per cent, and his lead as preferred prime minister is up from 66-25 to 67-24. Fifty-nine per cent want the government&#8217;s <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/environment/global-warming/voters-back-labor-on-emissions-scheme-20090816-emdh.html">emissions trading scheme bill</a> passed as soon as possible, and 58 per cent approve of Rudd&#8217;s handling of the relationship with China.</p>
<p>Essential Research should be through any moment now (4.30pm EST), but I won&#8217;t be able to help you with that until this evening: <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics">Possum</a>&#8217;s often quite quick on that front though (and <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/14/hendo-off-the-hook/comment-page-21/#comment-317741">The Finnigans</a> has a small amount of detail in comments). <i>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.essentialmedia.com.au/Media/Essential_Report_170809.pdf">Here it is</a>. Labor&#8217;s lead is down from 60-40 to 58-42. Also featured: the performance of Australian law enforcement in preventing terrorism (most excellent), whether such efforts have been unduly concentrated on the Muslim community (no), who should lead the Liberal Party (Joe Hockey), a really interesting one comparing Kevin Rudd&#8217;s performance across various issues with John Howard&#8217;s (slight lead to the latter on economy and defence/security, thumping ones to the former on everything else), and whether Malcolm Turnbull is fair dinkum on climate change (no).</i></p>
<p>Other matters:</p>
<p>&#8226; Mumble man Peter Brent has a paper in the latest Australian Journal of Political Science criticising the anachronism of the Divisional Returning Officer, part of what government consultants described as far back as 1974 as the Electoral Commission&#8217;s &#8220;flat&#8221; organisational structure: one national office at the top, six state ones in the middle, and no fewer than 150 divisional ones at the bottom. Occupants of the latter posts have too much to do during election periods, too little to do outside of them, and few paths to promotion, with resulting problems for staffing and morale. &#8220;Regionalisation&#8221; into offices covering four or five divisions has been advocated by the Electoral Commission itself, but has been resisted in part because MPs enjoy the convenience of a local electorate office, and also because they form troublingly close relationships with their local DROs.</p>
<p>&#8226; Two doses of cold water for Alannah MacTiernan&#8217;s tilt in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/canning.htm">Canning</a>. The ABC&#8217;s Rebecca Carmody strikes back over past acts of condescension in the <a href="http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,25934484-5005374,00.html">Sunday Times</a>, noting she has a big obstacle to overcome in winning over the electorate&#8217;s semi-rural areas beyond her Armadale base. Tony Barrass of The Australian concurs, describing her as &#8220;a polarising figure, perhaps the most admired-disliked state political figure in the past decade&#8221;, and chiding the local media for &#8220;talking as though she&#8217;s home and hosed&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8226; <a href="http://news.google.com.au/news/url?sa=t&#038;ct2=au%2F0_0_s_1_0_t&#038;usg=AFQjCNGxaM4e260CZg6O4I2g0KUixHtKPA&#038;cid=1296871399&#038;ei=v7uISpCGGJWekQXJxv0o&#038;rt=SEARCH&#038;vm=STANDARD&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.news.com.au%2Fstory%2F0%2C27574%2C25933481-5007133%2C00.html">Glenn Milne</a> beats the drum for a Kerryn Phelps candidacy against Malcolm Turnbull in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/wentworth.hth">Wentworth</a>. For what it&#8217;s worth though, Labor&#8217;s local federal electoral council is making noises about the need for a local rank-and-file vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/17/acnielsen-56-44-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1849</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 56-44 to Labor in Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/30/newspoll-56-44-to-labor-in-victoria/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/30/newspoll-56-44-to-labor-in-victoria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victorian politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest bi-monthly Victorian Newspoll shows the state Labor government losing some of the support it attracted in the wake of the February bushfires, while still retaining a commanding lead. The two-party figure May-June is 56-44, down from an unsustainable 60-40 in January-February (evidently there was no poll in the interim). John Brumby&#8217;s approval rating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/30jun-vicnewspoll.html">bi-monthly Victorian Newspoll</a> shows the state Labor government losing some of the support it attracted in the wake of the February bushfires, while still retaining a commanding lead. The two-party figure May-June is 56-44, down from an unsustainable 60-40 in January-February (evidently there was no poll in the interim). John Brumby&#8217;s approval rating is down four points to 48 per cent while his disapproval is up six to 37 per cent, but Ted Baillieu is also down four to 33 per cent and up three to 42 per cent. Brumby retains a lead over Baillieu of 54 per cent to 21 per cent as preferred premier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/30/newspoll-56-44-to-labor-in-victoria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Time time</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/02/26/party-time-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/02/26/party-time-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Poll Bludger&#8217;s Queensland election blogging activities will henceforth be conducted at Crikey&#8217;s Pineapple Party Time blog, which combines the energies of myself, Possum and Mark Bahnisch of Larvatus Prodeo. My seat-by-seat guide to Queensland&#8217;s 89 electorates is coming to the boil, and will hopefully be open for business by tomorrow. Non-Queensland action will of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/electioncentral/"><img src="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2009/02/ppt.gif" alt="" title="ppt" width="242" height="41" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2896" /></a>The Poll Bludger&#8217;s Queensland election blogging activities will henceforth be conducted at Crikey&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/electioncentral/">Pineapple Party Time</a> blog, which combines the energies of myself, <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics">Possum</a> and Mark Bahnisch of <a href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/">Larvatus Prodeo</a>. My seat-by-seat guide to Queensland&#8217;s 89 electorates is coming to the boil, and will hopefully be open for business by tomorrow. Non-Queensland action will of course continue as usual at this blog, although my own level of activity here will be relatively subdued over the next four weeks or so. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/02/26/party-time-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How green was my paper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/19/how-green-was-my-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/19/how-green-was-my-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland Election 2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Ripper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistributions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first of the federal government’s two green papers on electoral reform was released on Wednesday, this one dealing with disclosure, funding and expenditure issues. The paper was originally promised in June, but has been delayed pending consultation with state and territory governments. It might be hoped that this results in the unhelpful anomalies from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first of the federal government’s two green papers on electoral reform was released on Wednesday, this one dealing with <a href="http://www.pmc.gov.au/consultation/elect_reform/docs/electoral_reform_green_paper.pdf">disclosure, funding and expenditure issues</a>. The paper was originally promised in June, but has been delayed pending consultation with state and territory governments. It might be hoped that this results in the unhelpful anomalies from one jurisdiction to the next being ironed out, potentially allowing for the establishment of a single authority to administer the system. You have until February 23 to make submissions in response to this paper or in anticipation of the next, which will deal with &#8220;a broader range of issues, aimed at strengthening our national electoral laws&#8221;. This paper’s concerns in turn:</p>
<p><i>Disclosure</i>. State and territory party branches, associated entities (which include fundraising entities, affiliated trade unions and businesses with corporate party membership) and third parties (individuals or organisations that incur &#8220;political expenditure&#8221;, such as Your Rights at Work and GetUp!) are currently required to lodge annual returns disclosing details of campaign-related receipts, expenditure and debts. The Political Donations Bill currently before the Senate proposes to change reporting from annual to six monthly, but even this seems a bit lax. Voters would presumably want some idea of funding arrangements before they vote rather than after, and the practice in other countries shows how this could be done. In Britain, reporting is required weekly during election campaigns and quarterly at other times; in the United States, expenditures are disclosed daily during campaigns and donations monthly. This is made possible by mandatory electronic record keeping which is not required at this stage in Australia. Queensland’s and New Zealand’s practice of requiring disclosure of large donations within 10 or 14 days also sounds promising. Another issue is that itemised disclosure only applies to donations, which amounts to only a quarter of private funding &#8211; the rest coming from fundraising, investments and debt. Australia also uniquely requires &#8220;double disclosure&#8221; by both donors and recipients, which might be thought more trouble than it’s worth. </p>
<p><i>Funding</i>. Australia is unusual in that it has neither caps on donations or bans on donations from particular sources. Canada allows donations only from private individuals; the United States does not allow donations from corporations, banks, unions and federal government contractors. Public funding arrangements such as our own are common internationally, but New Zealand interestingly uses measures of public support other than votes, including party membership, number of MPs and poll results in the lead-up to elections. This allows broadcasting time to be allocated ostensibly on the basis of current support, so that the system is &#8220;less vulnerable to criticisms of favouring major parties in comparison with minor parties and independent candidates&#8221;.</p>
<p><i>Expenditure</i>. Expenditure caps apply in Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, with compensations of free air time provided in the latter two cases. They also existed here until 1980, when they were abolished on the basis that they &#8220;constrained campaigns&#8221; and were too hard to enforce. The US allows parties and candidates to agree to limit expenditure in exchange for public funding, which it settled for when set caps were ruled unconstitutional. Given that election campaigning is increasingly unconstrained by the formal campaign period, expenditure caps work best where there are fixed terms.</p>
<div align="center"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I-BYzaDwNoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I-BYzaDwNoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<p>In other news, we’re probably entering a Yuletide opinion poll drought, but there’s plenty else going down:</p>
<p>&#8226; Antony Green’s dissection of the Queensland state redistribution has been published by the <a href="http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/publications/documents/research/ResearchBriefs/2008/RBR200843.pdf">Queensland Parliamentary Library</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; The campaign for South Australia’s Frome by-election (the state’s first since 1994) is slowly coming to the boil &#8211; read all about it <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/11/frome-by-election-south-australia/">here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; More action than you can poke a stick at from the good people at <a href="http://arts.anu.edu.au/democraticaudit/">Democratic Audit of Australia</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; I missed an opinion poll last Saturday: Westpoll in The West Australian has the state’s new Liberal government leading 55-45, from a sample of 400. This sounds maybe a bit generous to Labor from primary votes of Liberal 45 per cent, Labor 34 per cent, Nationals 5 per cent and Greens 9 per cent. Labor’s Eric Ripper, viewed by all as a post-defeat stop-gap leader, has plunged seven points as preferred premier to 12 per cent, and even trails Colin Barnett 30 per cent to 26 per cent among Labor voters.</p>
<p>&#8226; The unstoppable <a href="http://tallyroom.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/nsw-redistribution-prospects/">Ben Raue at the Tally Room</a> plays the dangerous game of anticipating prospects for the looming federal New South Wales redistribution that will reduce the state from 49 seats to 48. So for that matter does Malcolm Mackerras in Crikey:</p>
<blockquote><p> Early this year I was quoted in The Australian as saying that the name <a href=http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/throsby.htm>Throsby</a> would disappear. The Illawarra media quickly picked up on this and I heard Jennie George say on ABC radio that I was engaging in &#8220;pure speculation&#8221;. She is quite right, of course. Although the loss of a NSW seat has always been assured, it is pure speculation to say which one it will be.</p>
<p>Nevertheless my proposition actually is that the south coast seats of <a href=http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/gilmore.htm>Gilmore</a> (Joanna Gash, Liberal) and Throsby (Jenny George, Labor) will be merged into a seat bearing the name of Gilmore. Such a seat would, in practice, be reasonably safe for Labor so really it would be Gash to lose her seat. As to why the name Gilmore would be preferred to the name Throsby the explanation is simple. Dame Mary Gilmore (1865-1962) was a woman whereas Charles Throsby (1777-1828) was a man.</p>
<p>We have the precedent of 2006 to know that the MP who is the actual victim of a redistribution is not necessarily the one whose seat disappears. In 2006 and 2007 Peter Andren was the true victim but the name of his seat, Calare, was retained. That he died shortly before the 2007 general election is not the point. His seat of Calare became so hopeless for him he announced that he would stand for the Senate. Consequently there is no reason why Joanna Gash may not be the real victim in 2009 even though the name of her seat is retained.</p>
<p>If this is the way the commissioners decide to do it then the flow-on effect would be interesting to watch. My belief is that Batemans Bay (presently in Gilmore) would be restored to <a href=http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/edenmonaro.htm>Eden-Monaro</a>, in which division it voted in 2001 and 2004. Then the Tumut and Tumbarumba shires (presently in Eden-Monaro) would be restored to <a href=http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/farrer.htm>Farrer</a>, in which division they voted in 2001 and 2004. Consequently it would be possible to retain all the rural seats by moving them into more urban areas. Bearing in mind that in 2006 the NSW commissioners abolished a rural seat but made the remaining seats more rural it would seem to me logical that in 2009 they would retain all the rural seats but make some of them less rural.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/19/how-green-was-my-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>578</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 59-41</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/08/newspoll-59-41-5/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/08/newspoll-59-41-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The parliamentary year has ended with a striking result from Newspoll: Labor leads 59-41, up from 55-45 last fortnight, with Kevin Rudd leading Malcolm Turnbull as preferred prime minister 66 per cent (up three) to 19 per cent (down two). Kevin Rudd&#8217;s approval rating of 70 per cent is one point shy of his previous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parliamentary year has ended with a <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24771879-601,00.html">striking result from Newspoll</a>: Labor leads 59-41, up from 55-45 last fortnight, with Kevin Rudd leading Malcolm Turnbull as preferred prime minister 66 per cent (up three) to 19 per cent (down two). Kevin Rudd&#8217;s approval rating of 70 per cent is one point shy of his previous best from April, while Malcolm Turnbull&#8217;s approval and disapproval have both gone five points in the wrong direction, to 47 per cent and 32 per cent (The Australian offers a <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspoll-dec9.jpg">graphic</a> and a nifty <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspolltracker.jpg">preferred prime minister tracker</a> showing figures back to early 2006). Nonetheless, the leadership ratings suggest voting intention would have been even worse for the Coalition if Brendan Nelson was still leader. Turnbull&#8217;s approval rating is still seven points higher than Nelson&#8217;s best result, and the 47 per cent gap on preferred prime minister is roughly equal to what Nelson managed when Rudd&#8217;s approval was in the mid-50s. Elsewhere:</p>
<p>&#8226; <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2008/12/essential-report_081208.pdf">Essential Research</a> also has Labor leading 59-41, up from 58-42 last week. Also featured are questions on the performance of Julie Bishop as Shadow Treasurer, the relative popularity of Julia Gillard and Julie Bishop and “global terrorism and international unrest”.</p>
<p>&#8226; The <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/2008-09/09rp17.pdf">Australian Parliamentary Library</a> has published a paper providing statistical details from every election since federation, along with a precis detailing the circumstances of each election.</p>
<p>&#8226; Sky News, Foxtel and Austar have announced that a <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/08/2440386.htm?section=entertainment">public and political affairs television network</a> called A-APAN, along the lines of the American C-SPAN, will be launched on January 20 next year. It will feature coverage of parliament and committee proceedings, industry meetings, and congressional and parliamentary coverage from the United States and the United Kingdom. It will be available on pay TV and digital free-to-air, the latter initially only in Sydney.</p>
<p>&#8226; Colin Barnett says the proposal for <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24765703-5006789,00.html">fixed terms in Western Australia</a> will feature &#8220;a mechanism if there is some catastrophic behaviour of a government that you might be able to bring on a poll&#8221;. It will also provide for flexibility in the announcement of a date in either February or March, rather than fixing a precise date.</p>
<p>&#8226; Antony Green has <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/12/nsw-fixed-term.html">weighed in</a> on the recent criticism of New South Wales&#8217; system of fixed four-year terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/08/newspoll-59-41-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1313</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super size me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/04/super-size-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/04/super-size-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess we&#8217;re not getting a Morgan poll tomorrow, so a stand-alone post is required to note recent developments. To wit:
&#8226; Antony Green has crunched the numbers from the Australian Bureau of Statistics&#8217; latest state and territory population figures and concluded that yet another new seat will need to be created in Queensland next year, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we&#8217;re not getting a Morgan poll tomorrow, so a stand-alone post is required to note recent developments. To wit:</p>
<p>&#8226; <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/12/nsw-and-queensl.html">Antony Green</a> has crunched the numbers from the Australian Bureau of Statistics&#8217; latest state and territory population figures and concluded that yet another new seat will need to be created in Queensland next year, again at the expense of New South Wales. Queensland will thus have boomed from 26 seats to 30 in little over a decade, having earlier gained <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/blair.htm">Blair</a> in 1998, <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/bonner.htm">Bonner</a> in 2004 and <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/flynn.htm">Flynn</a> in 2007. New South Wales lost Gwydir in 2007.</p>
<p>&#8226; The <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Media_releases/2008/12_01.htm">Australian Electoral Commission</a> has announced that the finalised new federal boundaries for Western Australia will be gazetted on December 18, and maps published henceforth.</p>
<p>&#8226; Possum reckons &#8220;it&#8217;s time to rethink political demographics&#148, and explains why across a two-part epic <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/03/its-time-to-rethink-political-demographics-part-1/">here</a> and <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/04/it%E2%80%99s-time-to-rethink-political-demographics-part-2/">here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Canadian_political_dispute">constitutional crisis</a> is brewing in Canada that has some <a href="http://frum.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmNhMGRiMGI3ZmVmODM0NWQ0Y2E4OTkxMDlhZjI4OTA=">excited observers</a> invoking the example of Australia in 1975. The election on October 14 saw Stephen Harper&#8217;s Conservative minority government re-elected, but again requiring the support of Bloc Québécois. However, Bloc Québécois has now signed an accord with the Liberal Party and leftist New Democrats due to dissatisfaction with the government&#8217;s handling of the financial crisis. Harper reportedly plans to ask that Governor-General Michaëlle Jean prorogue the parliament so it will not sit until the budget is presented in January. This would avert a sitting on December 8 at which Harper&#8217;s government would likely be defeated on a no-confidence motion, and allow him time to pick apart the Liberal-Bloc-NDP deal. This raises the question of whether Jean ought to grant a prorogation to a Prime Minister who might not have the confidence of the House.</p>
<p>UPDATE (5/12/08): Jean <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/04/harper-jean.html">agrees to prorogue parliament</a> until January 26. <a href="http://tallyroom.wordpress.com/">Ben Raue at The Tally Room</a> expresses his displeasure, and proposes reforms to the appointment of prime ministers (citing the practice in the Australian Capital Territory), the scheduling of parliament and the timing elections. I am a little more sympathetic to Jean&#8217;s decision, on account of the Liberals&#8217; evident <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/04/opposition-parliament.html">state of disarray</a> &#8211; although I can buy the idea that it&#8217;s not the Governor-General&#8217;s role to make such judgements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/04/super-size-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1278</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Galaxy: 51-49 to Labor in Queensland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/01/galaxy-51-49-to-labor-in-queensland/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/01/galaxy-51-49-to-labor-in-queensland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Bligh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycled water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Galaxy survey of 800 voters published in today&#8217;s Courier-Mail finds the Queensland Labor and Liberal National parties even on 41 per cent of the vote with the Greens on 10 per cent. Labor leads 51-49 after distribution of preferences. The results at the September 2006 election were 46.9 per cent Labor, 20.1 per cent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24730633-3102,00.html">Galaxy survey</a> of 800 voters published in today&#8217;s Courier-Mail finds the Queensland Labor and Liberal National parties even on 41 per cent of the vote with the Greens on 10 per cent. Labor leads 51-49 after distribution of preferences. The results at the September 2006 election were 46.9 per cent Labor, 20.1 per cent Liberal, 17.8 per cent Nationals, 8.0 per cent Greens and 54.9-45.1 to Labor after preferences. The Mail&#8217;s Steven Wardill reckons &#8220;an early election to limit Labor&#8217;s losses, likely in either late February or early March, is now a near-certainty given that Ms Bligh appears unable to address the downward spiral&#8221;, although the result is much the same as Newspoll and Galaxy surveys published in September. The poll also finds that no fewer than 82 per cent of respondents were in favour of the use of treated sewage as drinking water, which seems surprising given the result of the referendum on the matter in Toowoomba in 2006. I would be interested to see the wording of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/01/galaxy-51-49-to-labor-in-queensland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan: 59.5-40.5</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/28/morgan-595-405/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/28/morgan-595-405/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Redistributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmanian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bartlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Morgan face-to-face poll has Labor&#8217;s lead at 59.5-40.5, up from 58.5-41.5 a fortnight ago. Primary votes are Labor 50.5 per cent (up 1.5), Coalition 35.5 (down 0.5) and Greens 7.5 (down 1). Elsewhere:
&#8226; The redistribution of Tasmania&#8217;s electoral boundaries has been finalised. Several amendments have been made from the original proposal, which you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4339/">Morgan face-to-face poll</a> has Labor&#8217;s lead at 59.5-40.5, up from 58.5-41.5 a fortnight ago. Primary votes are Labor 50.5 per cent (up 1.5), Coalition 35.5 (down 0.5) and Greens 7.5 (down 1). Elsewhere:</p>
<p>&#8226; The redistribution of Tasmania&#8217;s electoral boundaries has been finalised. Several amendments have been made from the <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/Electorates/Redistributions/2008/tas/proposed_report/index.htm">original proposal</a>, which you can read about <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Media_releases/2008/11_28.htm">here</a>. <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/08/draft-new-bound.html#more">Antony Green</a> calculates the new boundaries have increased Labor&#8217;s margin in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/braddon">Braddon</a> from 1.4 per cent to 2.5 per cent, while reducing it in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/denison">Denison</a> from 15.6 per cent to 15.3 per cent, <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/franklin">Franklin</a> from 4.5 per cent to 3.7 per cent and <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/lyons">Lyons</a> from 8.8 per cent to 8.4 per cent. <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/bass">Bass</a> remains at 1.0 per cent.</p>
<p>&#8226; A bill to introduce fixed terms was <a href="http://notes.nt.gov.au/lant/hansard/hansardd.nsf/WebbySubject/7CAFA971D3F10CB76925750E00038E94?opendocument">introduced to the Northern Territory parliament</a> on Wednesday. David Bartlett says <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/17/2421976.htm">similar legislation</a> will be introduced in Tasmania next year, confirming the next election will be held on March 20, 2010 and setting up an ongoing clash with South Australia&#8217;s elections (to <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/11/reprise-fixed-t.html">Antony Green</a>&#8217;s dismay). I&#8217;ll have much more to say on fixed four-year terms next week.</p>
<p>&#8226; Tomorrow is Victorian local government election day, which in most cases means today is the last day for submission of postal votes. Read and comment about it <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/15/victorian-council-elections-november-29/">here</a>. <a href="http://tallyroom.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/victorian-local-government-election/">Ben Raue at The Tally Room</a> has council and ward map files for viewing in Google Earth.</p>
<p>&#8226; In Queensland, poll-driven decisions on <a href="http://news.theage.com.au/national/bligh-signals-backflips-on-water-dam-20081125-6gly.html">water policy</a> are being seen as a harbinger of an early election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/28/morgan-595-405/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>371</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACT election live</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/act-election-live/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/act-election-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland Election 2004]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=1600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11.15pm. A very strong performance by the Greens at the Lyneham booth in Molonglo (29.2 per cent) has been cancelled out by other late booths: the Greens (1.47) now trail the Liberals (2.49) in the hunt for the last quota.
11.07pm. I earlier said a third Labor seat in Ginninderra would go to Dave Peebles, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11.15pm. A very strong performance by the Greens at the Lyneham booth in Molonglo (29.2 per cent) has been cancelled out by other late booths: the Greens (1.47) now trail the Liberals (2.49) in the hunt for the last quota.</p>
<p>11.07pm. I earlier said a third Labor seat in Ginninderra would go to Dave Peebles, but he now slightly trails Adina Cirson.</p>
<p>10.58pm. It&#8217;s also being said that Frank Pangallo can&#8217;t be written off in Molonglo, although it&#8217;s conceded that it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
<p>10.56pm. Talk on the ABC is that independent Mark Parton is not out of the hunt in Ginninderra, depending on how independent preferences go. If successful the result there would be two Labor and one each for Liberal, Greens and independent. He has 6.6 per cent of the primary vote.</p>
<p>10.43pm. I&#8217;m back. Greens sounding slightly more hopeful of that second seat in Molonglo and Labor likewise of a third seat in Ginninderra, but both remain up in the air and if anything leaning slightly to the Liberals.</p>
<p>9.13pm. I&#8217;ll be taking a break shortly, so a recap. Brindabella: No doubt the result here is 2-2-1, little doubt Steve Doszpot has taken a Liberal seat from Steve Pratt, possible Joy Burch will take a Labor seat from Mick Gentleman. Ginninderra: Liberals seem to be recovering a little after the 3-1-1 scare, and looking better for 2-2-1, but a few big booths still to come. If it&#8217;s the former, Vicki Dunne will lose her seat to Labor&#8217;s Dave Peebles. Newcomer Alistair Coe has done very well to be a clear Liberal winner. Molonglo: Labor&#8217;s three incumbents looking good; two seat for the Liberals (Zed Seselja overwhelmingly dominating the vote, so unclear if the second will be second-placed Jeremy Hanson or third-placed Guilia Jones), one seat for the Greens (Shane Rattenbury), and the final seat a contest between a third Liberal and a second Greens (unclear if Caroline Le Couteur or Elena Kirschbaum). So Labor has lost its majority but might yet win eight seats out of 17, but more likely seven; Liberal between five and seven; Greens three or four.</p>
<p>9.10pm. What I might have missed in Molonglo is the 3 per cent vote for Richard Mulcahy which will presumably flow heavily to the Liberals (thanks to Oz in comments).</p>
<p>9.06pm. With the vote up from 42.3 to 57.6, the Liberals have recovered slightly in Ginninderra, up from 27.1 to 27.8 per cent. They would still seem more likely than not to win a second seat, but are by no means home and hosed. As far as I can see, the prospect of a second Greens seat in Molonglo looks higher than most are saying: they are on 1.45 quotas against 2.51 for the Liberals, and could surely close that 0.06 gap on preferences. There is a lot I could be missing though.</p>
<p>8.52pm. Situation in Molonglo is that Labor are sure for three, the Liberals for two and the Greens for one, with the final seat down to a third Liberal and a second Green.</p>
<p>8.50pm. Brindabella count up to 63.2 per cent, but the basic situation changed: Labor two (John Hargreaves returned, but Mick Gentleman not home against party newcomer Joy Burch), Liberal two (Brendan Smyth plus Steve Doszpot looking likely to defeat Steve Pratt), Greens one (Amanda Bresnan).</p>
<p>8.46pm. Talk on ABC of the Liberal vote continuing to fade in Ginninderra, putting their second seat at risk. That could mean a final outcome of Labor 8, Liberal 6, Greens 3. The Liberal casualty in Ginninderra would be incumbent Vicki Dunne, who is well behind newcomer Alistair Coe.</p>
<p>8.22pm. Vote count really ticking over now: up to 45.9 per cent in Brindabella, and Joy Burch has hit the lead over Mick Gentleman for the second Labor seat. Steve Pratt now trails Steve Doszpot 8.3 per cent to 6.3 per cent, which is just about lethal for Pratt.</p>
<p>8.20pm. I intimated earlier that Brendan Smyth&#8217;s preferences might help Pratt narrow the gap over Doszpot, but the very helpful Ben Raue points out that Smyth is himself some way short of a quota so won&#8217;t have preferences to give.</p>
<p>8.10pm. Ginninderra vote up from 16.8 to 20.9 and the Liberals have gone down further, from 1.71 quotas to 1.68.</p>
<p>8.08pm. The brains trust, and apparently the man himself, doesn&#8217;t think Pangallo is a chance.</p>
<p>8.05pm. Brindabella count up from 19.5 per cent to 24.3 per cent, and the gap between Doszpot and Pratt continues to widen.</p>
<p>8.02pm. With an extra 1.8 per cent counted (20.1 per cent), the Greens vote up slightly in Molonglo, where there support is unevenly spread. It might be that Frank Pangallo is in the hunt here: his group is on 0.38 quotas against 1.39 for the Greens.</p>
<p>7.58pm. An extra 2.5 per cent counted in Brindabella bears out what Adam said earlier: Labor up from 34.2 per cent to 34.9 per cent, Liberal down from 36.8 per cent to 36.1 per cent, Greens down from 13.6 per cent. The 2-2-1 outcome here is not in doubt, but it&#8217;s interesting to note that Steve Pratt has fallen further behind newcomer Liberal Steve Doszpot: from 7.7-7.1 to 7.7-6.8. However, as a sitting member and ally of Brendan Smyth, Pratt can presumably expect to do better on the latter&#8217;s preferences.</p>
<p>7.55pm. Ben Raue on the ground notes: &#8220;Of course it takes ages. First of all you’ve gotta unfold them, then sort them into columns, then sort them into individuals within columns when all different ballots have the candidates in a different order, then tally them. It takes a lot longer than a federal primary count.&#8221;</p>
<p>7.54pm. Count remains slow, but Liberal spokesman on ABC Radio doesn&#8217;t sound concerned about a second seat in Ginninderra despite only being on 1.7 quotas at present.</p>
<p>7.25pm. Count now proceeding slowly after initial excitement. Adam Carr notes in comments that the polls are doing better for Labor than the pre-polls. Greens hopes for a second seat in Molonglo seem to be fading.</p>
<p>7.11pm. ABC Radio commentators pretty much writing off Richard Mulcahy.</p>
<p>7.05pm. Big picture: 11 per cent swing against Labor, slight drop in the Liberals, big pick-up for the Greens &#8211; definitely good for three seats, maybe yet four. ABC computer still saying seven each for Labor and Liberal, three for the Greens. Kate Lundy still thinks Labor might win three seats in Ginninderra, but they&#8217;ll have to do better than their current 2.3 quotas.</p>
<p>6.52pm. More on Molonglo: Sometime NSW Greens candidate Ben Raue vaguely hopeful in comments of a second Greens seat, but early days with booth votes only just starting to come in. Katy Gallagher easily leading the Labor field; Andrew Barr not doing well for a presumed future leader, but still very likely to win a seat. Simon Corbell the poorest performing of the three Labor incumbents. Zed Seselja home and hosed, but Jacqui Burke in trouble, trailing two Liberal newcomers in Jeremy Hanson and Guilia Jones.</p>
<p>6.40pm. Molonglo: Labor looking good for three seats, the Liberals not certain of more than two, Shane Rattenbury home and hosed for the Greens.</p>
<p>6.38pm. Ginninderra: The Liberals are short of two quotas at the moment, but probably not by enough to stop them winning two seats. Vicki Dunne is trailing newcomer Alistair Coe; both should win seats unless they are indeed in danger of only winning one. Jon Stanhope and Mary Porter both set to be returned. Meredith Hunter to win a seat for the Greens.</p>
<p>6.35pm. Brindabella: on counting of pre-polls, Labor and Liberal are both just above two quotas and the Greens just below one, leaving no doubt as to the result if the trend continues. Intriguingly, Steve Doszpot narrowly leads Steve Pratt in the race for the second Liberal seat; Brendan Smyth is clearly not in trouble. John Hargreaves certain to win the first Labor seat, but Joy Burch perhaps an outside change to beat Mick Gentleman, although she is behind. Strong performances by the micro-parties, but not strong enough.</p>
<p>6.32pm. ABC computer predicting seven seats each to Labor and Liberal and three to the Greens.</p>
<p>6.26pm. That quick counting has indeed been down to electronic voting &#8211; all those results are pre-polls. I expect things will quieten down a little for a while now.</p>
<p>6.21pm. Presumably to rub salt into the wounds of the technical problems I have been having, the ACT Electoral Commission are conducting the count at breakneck speed &#8211; perhaps this has something to do with electronic voting. 12.9 per cent counted and those opinion polls are looking good &#8211; Labor down 10.7 per cent, Liberals down 2.9 per cent, Greens up 7.2 per cent.</p>
<p>6.20pm. Apologies for the delay in getting started. Oz in comments writes: &#8220;5% counted. 9.8% swing to The Greens in Brindabella. 12.1% counted, 7.4% swing to The Greens in Ginninderra. 11% counted in Molonglo, 7% swing to The Greens. Labor and Lib losing out, Independants also getting swings.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/act-election-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>293</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Bludger version 3.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/11/poll-bludger-version-30/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/11/poll-bludger-version-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the new-look Poll Bludger, brought to you as part of a broader incursion into the blogosphere by wealthy benefactors/gentleman admirers at Crikey. Note parallel developments from Possum Comitatus. The site has a new address in the Crikey domain: the old site will redirect here. The interior decoration is incomplete, so don&#8217;t despair for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the new-look Poll Bludger, brought to you as part of a broader incursion into the blogosphere by wealthy benefactors/gentleman admirers at Crikey. Note parallel developments from <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/">Possum Comitatus</a>. The site has a new address in the Crikey domain: the old site will redirect here. The interior decoration is incomplete, so don&#8217;t despair for apparently missing features quite yet. To pre-empt the complaint which is now no doubt forming in many minds: no, you do not need to be a Crikey subscriber, trial or otherwise, to comment on this blog. However, you do have to register, which means providing a real email address which you will need to verify – I do not think anyone can rightly complain about this. To pre-empt another complaint: this site is run by WordPress just like my old site was and will run in very much the same way, without the limitations you might be familiar with from the old Crikey blogging platform. Beyond that, it will be business more-or-less as usual. There will be a slight difference in my moderation policy, which is to say that I will have one. More on that shortly.</p>
<p>As you can see, all the posts and comments from Wednesday are present and correct, so please carry on as before. Please keep this thread for requests/feedback/bug reports/complaints about the new order, and direct political discussion where appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/11/poll-bludger-version-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>202</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
