<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Poll Bludger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen: 53-47 to Coalition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/02/05/nielsen-53-47-to-coalition-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/02/05/nielsen-53-47-to-coalition-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics 2010-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems Nielsen&#8217;s sample of 1400 respondents from its first opinion poll of the year didn&#8217;t get the memo: the poll has the Coalition&#8217;s two-party preferred lead at 53-47, which although not brilliant for the government in absolute terms is its best result from Nielsen since March last year. The same applies for the primary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Nielsen&#8217;s sample of 1400 respondents from its first opinion poll of the year didn&#8217;t get the memo: the poll has the Coalition&#8217;s two-party preferred lead at 53-47, which although not brilliant for the government in absolute terms is its best result from Nielsen since March last year. The same applies for the primary vote, on which Labor is at 33 per cent, while the Coalition is on 45 per cent and the Greens are on 13 per cent. This looks particularly good for Labor if you compare it with the most recent result from the same pollster, as the media so likes to do. That poll, which was published on December 11, had Labor at 29 per cent, the Coalition at 49 per cent and the Greens at 11 per cent, with two-party preferred at 57-43. Labor&#8217;s relatively strong showing has been driven by a quirky looking result from the Victorian component of the poll, which has Labor leading 55-45 &#8211; essentially the same as the 2010 election result, and better for them than at any Nielsen poll since. The Victorian component accounts for 330 respondents and has a margin of error of 5.4 per cent; the results for the other states should emerge tomorrow. The margin of error for the poll as a whole, which as always with Nielsen was conducted from Thursday to Saturday, is 2.6 per cent. </p>
<p>Even better for Labor so far as tomorrow&#8217;s headlines are concerned is an eight-point improvement in Julia Gillard&#8217;s net personal rating and a six-point improvement as preferred prime minister. Gillard&#8217;s approval is up five on the previous poll to 40 per cent and her disapproval is down three to 55 per cent, and she has shot to a 48-46 lead over Tony Abbott as preferred prime minister after trailing 46-42 last time. These results are very similar to the November poll, and the shifts probably represent a correction on an aberrant result in December. That Gillard has gained six points on preferred prime minister without taking a chunk out of Abbott&#8217;s rating is curious, and calls attention to the much lower undecided rating Nielsen produces on this question (ranging from 6 per cent to 12 per cent since the election) compared with Newspoll (15 per cent to 25 per cent). Tony Abbott&#8217;s personal ratings meanwhile are essentially unchanged: approval steady on 41 per cent, and disapproval up one to 54 per cent (his equal worst results from Nielsen on both counts).</p>
<p>One fly in the ointment for Gillard is that Nielsen has, reasonably enough, put her head-to-head with Kevin Rudd as preferred Labor leader, with Rudd predictably holding a commanding 57 per cent to 35 per cent lead. However, even this is a much better result for Gillard than when the question was last asked at Labor&#8217;s polling nadir in October, when Rudd led 61 per cent to 30 per cent.</p>
<p>Numbers, it almost goes without saying, courtesy of GhostWhoVotes. <i>UPDATE: Full tables, including state breakdowns and such, <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2012/02/Nielsen-Poll-Table-February-2012-2.pdf">here</a>.</i></p>
<p>UPDATE: Essential Research once again has the two-party vote at 54-46, as it has in every poll since December 12 (and not since September has it failed to produce a result of either 54-46 or 55-45). Labor however has dropped a point on the primary vote for the second week in a row, now at 33 per cent (their weakest result since October 24), with the Coalition steady on 47 per cent and the Greens up a point to 11 per cent. A question on the government&#8217;s industrial relations regime finds 24 per cent believing it favours workers, 25 per cent believing it favours employers and 34 per cent finding it balances the interests of both, which would be a very pleasing set of numbers from the government&#8217;s point of view. The poll also has 15 per cent of respondents saying Australian workers are &#8220;very productive&#8221; and 59 per cent &#8220;quite productive&#8221;. Also canvassed was trust in various public institutions, which has the Australian Defence Force on top. Curiously, the least trusted out of those included were &#8220;business and banking regulators&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/02/05/nielsen-53-47-to-coalition-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1776</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll, Essential Research and Galaxy: 54-46 to Coalition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-54-46-to-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-54-46-to-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics 2010-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: The first Newspoll result of the year has just been reported, and I&#8217;m sticking it on the top of the existing post because of technical difficulties we&#8217;re having. The poll has the Coalition leading 54-46 on two-party preferred, in common with Essential Research and Galaxy (see below), and indeed with last year&#8217;s final Newspoll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>UPDATE: The first Newspoll result of the year has just been reported, and I&#8217;m sticking it on the top of the existing post because of technical difficulties we&#8217;re having. The poll has the Coalition leading 54-46 on two-party preferred, in common with Essential Research and Galaxy (see below), and indeed with last year&#8217;s final Newspoll result from December 2-4. However, Newspoll has both parties solidly lower on the primary vote than the other two pollsters, at 30 per cent for Labor and 45 per cent for the Coalition &#8211; which is respectively down one and up one on the December poll. Julia Gillard&#8217;s approval rating is also down three points to 33 per cent and her disapproval is down one to 55 per cent. Tony Abbott&#8217;s numbers are all but identical to Gillard&#8217;s, his approval steady on 32 per cent and disapproval down two to 55 per cent. Gillard&#8217;s lead as preferred prime minister has narrowed from 43-36 to 40-37. </i></p>
<p>The <a href="http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/01/29/1226256/684985-galaxy-poll.jpg">Daily Telegraph</a> reports Galaxy&#8217;s first poll of federal voting intention since October is in line with other recent polling in showing the Coalition&#8217;s two-party preferred lead at 54-46, from primary votes of 34 per cent for Labor, 48 per cent for the Coalition and 12 per cent for the Greens. However, Kevin Rudd&#8217;s big lead over Julia Gillard in a head-to-head contest for preferred Labor leader is essentially unchanged at 52 per cent to 30 per cent, compared with 53 per cent to 29 per cent in October. When Bill Shorten is thrown in as a third contender he scores 14 per cent to Rudd&#8217;s 44 per cent and Gillard&#8217;s 27 per cent. The poll was conducted on Saturday and Sunday (i.e. today if you&#8217;re reading this soon enough) from a sample of 1001, with a margin of error of about 3 per cent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.essentialmedia.com.au/wp-content/themes/rockwell/documents/essential_report_120130.pdf">Essential Research</a> has the Coalition leading 54-46 from primary votes of 35 per cent for Labor, 48 per cent for the Coalition and 10 per cent for the Greens, which differs from last week only in that the Greens are a point higher, and is exactly the same as the week before. The supplementary questions include some zingers, not least the finding that our greatest Prime Ministers of the past 70 years were John Howard (33 per cent, up from 28 per cent when the question was last asked in January 2009) followed by Kevin Rudd and Bob Hawke (15 per cent). Howard scores no less than 61 per cent among Coalition voters, leaving Bob Menzies for dust on 18 per cent, while Labor supporters divide much more evenly between Hawke and Rudd, and to a lesser extent Whitlam and Keating. Poor old Malcolm Fraser scores a third of Gough Whitlam, a fifth of Bob Hawke and an eleventh of John Howard. Also featured are blast-from-the-past questions on how respondents rate the Building the Education Revolution: 30 per cent good and 31 per cent poor, although that includes 15 per cent very poor and only 7 per cent very good. Desire for a new election is essentially unchanged on December, at 40 per cent for and 48 per cent against, and support for a <i>trial</i> of mandatory pre-commitment is at 58 per cent with 29 per cent opposed &#8211; though I would sooner have seen support for it compared with a non-trial introduction before the election</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-54-46-to-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7262</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Galaxy: 59-41 to LNP in Queensland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-59-41-to-lnp-in-queensland-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-59-41-to-lnp-in-queensland-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Queensland Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days late with this one, but let the record note that a Galaxy poll of 800 respondents shows the LNP retaining a huge lead of 59-41 on two-party preferred and 49 per cent to 32 per cent on preferences. This does represent a narrowing on the previous such poll, conducted in mid-November, which had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days late with this one, but let the record note that a Galaxy poll of 800 respondents shows the LNP retaining a huge lead of 59-41 on two-party preferred and 49 per cent to 32 per cent on preferences. This does represent a narrowing on the previous such poll, conducted in mid-November, which had two-party at 62-38 and the primary votes at 28 per cent and 50 per cent. Anna Bligh has also had a slight improvement on personal ratings which are now almost respectable: 43 per cent approval (up two) and 50 per cent disapproval (down three). Campbell Newman however outstrips her with 48 per cent approval (up one) and 37 per cent disapproval (steady), and leads 49-40 as preferred premier (51-40 last time). The poll was conducted by phone on Tuesday and Wednesday nights and has a margin of error of about 3.5 per cent.</p>
<p>Also:</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-ashgrove">Ashgrove</a> (Labor 7.1%):</b> Brisbane lord mayor Graham Quirk has ruled out standing aside to allow for Campbell Newman to return to his old job if he fails to win Ashgrove. This possibility was created by the new election timetable which pushes the council elections out to April 28. A troubling precedent for Newman is the difficulty long-term Labor lord mayor Clem Jones had trying to win state and federal seats in the early 1970s &#8211; old stagers recall that the Liberals did well telling voters they should vote against Jones because he was needed at city hall. Campbell Newman meanwhile has taken offence at Labor flyers linking him to the infamous newspaper column by Cairns LNP candidate Gavin King, in which King argues women who are raped while drunk are partly to blame for their own misfortune.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-dalrymple">Dalrymple</a> (LNP 15.8%):</b> The Tablelands Advertiser reports that Rosa Lee Long, One Nation member for Tablelands from 2001 to 2009, says the LNP approached her to stand as its candidate. Long contested Dalrymple after Tablelands was abolished at the 2009 election, but was defeated by Shane Knuth, who had held the abolished Charters Towers for the LNP and has since jumped ship for Katter&#8217;s Australian Party. The LNP candidate is Liz Schmidt, who has a high profile locally as a livestock transport operator.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-nanango">Nanango</a> (Independent 2.9% versus LNP):</b> The Australian reports the LNP is insisting it is on track to win both Dalrymple and Nanango, the latter to be contested by former test cricketer and local farmer Carl Rackemann following the retirement of long-serving independent Dorothy Pratt.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-mountisa">Mount Isa</a> (Labor 5.7%):</b> Labor on the other hand reportedly concedes Bob Katter&#8217;s son Robbie Katter will be &#8220;hard to beat&#8221; in Mount Isa, where he will attempt to unseat Labor&#8217;s Betty Kiernan. Robbie Katter is another who claims he was approached by LNP talent scouts. His father meanwhile is predicting his party will win at least 20 seats, which not too many would credit.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-logan">Logan</a> (Labor 13.9%):</b> LNP candidate Peter Anderson-Barr, a police sergeant, has withdrawn after media reports from 2004 were circulated regarding an incident in which he allegedly struck a person at the Surfers Paradise police post.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-mundingburra">Mundingburra</a> (Labor 6.6%):</b> Former Thuringowa councillor David Moyle will run for Katter&#8217;s Australian Party after the withdrawal of their original candidate Jason Grigg. Moyle admits to having variously been a member of Labor, Liberal and the Nationals, and sought Nationals preselection for <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012-thuringowa">Thuringowa</a> in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/29/galaxy-59-41-to-lnp-in-queensland-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan: 52-48 to Coalition face-to-face</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/27/morgan-52-48-to-coalition-face-to-face/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/27/morgan-52-48-to-coalition-face-to-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics 2010-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hold the front page: Labor shoots to election-winning opinion poll lead. Well, sort of &#8211; the poll comes from the little-reported Morgan face-to-face series, which is noted for leaning heavily to Labor when measured against both election results and other pollsters, and the lead only stands if you allocate minor party and independent preferences according [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold the front page: Labor shoots to election-winning opinion poll lead. Well, sort of &#8211; the poll comes from the little-reported <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2012/4740/">Morgan face-to-face series</a>, which is noted for leaning heavily to Labor when measured against both election results and other pollsters, and the lead only stands if you allocate minor party and independent preferences according to the result of the previous election. On the primary vote, Labor is at 38.5 per cent (which is half a point higher than the 2010 election result), the Coalition is on 42.5 per cent (43.6 per cent at the election) and the Greens are on 12 per cent. If you assume preferences would behave  as they did at the previous election, as most pollsters do, that translates into a 51-49 lead for Labor. However, the Morgan face-to-face series continues to confound by showing minor party and independent voters splitting about 50-50 when asked which of the major parties they would preference, with the result that the Coalition leads 52-48 on the measure Morgan uses at its headline figure. The poll covers the last two weekends of Morgan&#8217;s regular surveying, from a total sample of 1921.</p>
<p>Morgan poops Labor&#8217;s party a little further with the unheralded publication of voting intention figures from a phone survey of what I take to have been about 600 respondents on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week (from which we&#8217;d previously seen only <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2012/4738/">this</a> &#8211; the sample quoted is 646 persons over 14, the youngest of whom would not have been included in the voting intention figures), which shows Labor doing only slightly better than the overall trend. This poll has the Coalition leading 46.5 per cent to 35.5 per cent on the primary vote, 53.5-46.5 on previous-election preferences and 54.5-45.5 on respondent-allocated preferences, with the Greens on 9 per cent. The Labor primary vote is the highest they have recorded at any phone poll (Newspoll, Nielsen, Morgan or Galaxy) since the middle of March 2011, although the margin of error on this occasion is a high 4 per cent.</p>
<p>Going back to the middle of the last year, Labor&#8217;s respondent-allocated preference share from pollsters who publish figures for this has been 63.1 per cent from Nielsen polls, 61.8 per cent from Morgan phone polls (of which there have been five) and 49.7 per cent from Morgan face-to-face polls. At the 2010 election it was 65.7 per cent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/27/morgan-52-48-to-coalition-face-to-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2746</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queensland election: March 24</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/25/queensland-election-march-24/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/25/queensland-election-march-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Queensland Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anna Bligh has today announced the Queensland state election will be held on March 24, after the state&#8217;s floods inquiry was recalled to hear what Hedley Thomas of The Australian describes as &#8220;extraordinary new evidence that suggests the wrong strategy was used to manage Wivenhoe Dam days before Brisbane was inundated&#8221;. Bligh explained today that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Bligh has today announced the Queensland state election will be held on March 24, after the state&#8217;s floods inquiry was recalled to hear what <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/dam-bursts-on-new-evidence-as-queensland-flood-inquiry-is-recalled/story-fn59niix-1226252884772?from=hot-topics-home">Hedley Thomas of The Australian</a> describes as &#8220;extraordinary new evidence that suggests the wrong strategy was used to manage Wivenhoe Dam days before Brisbane was inundated&#8221;. </p>
<p>Bligh explained today that it had been her intention to hold a poll on March 3, but she will now hold off until after the inquiry reports on March 16. This amounts to an effective campaign of over eight weeks (although she will not visit the Governor to officially call the election until February 19), which may be without precedent in Australia at least so far as past three or four decades are concerned. It had generally been thought that a long campaign would be in Bligh&#8217;s interests, as it allows an incumbent trailing by a long margin to hope that either the Opposition Leader or the party behind him might fracture under the pressure.</p>
<p>The state&#8217;s local government elections, previously due on March 31, will now be delayed until after Easter to allow for more clear air after the state election. It was reported earlier this month that the Electoral Commission of Queensland wanted a six months gap on either side of the council elections for logistical reasons.</p>
<p>For comprehensive details on each of the state&#8217;s 89 electorates, look no further than the <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/qld2012">Poll Bludger&#8217;s election guide</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/25/queensland-election-march-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential Research: 54-46 to Coalition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/23/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-7/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/23/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics 2010-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Essential Research poll is unchanged on last week&#8217;s result, except that the Greens are up a point to 10 per cent &#8211; Labor is on 35 per cent, the Coalition is on 48 per cent, and two-party preferred is 54-46. Further questions relate to mandatory pre-commitment, with support at 62 per cent (one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
The latest <a href="http://www.essentialmedia.com.au/wp-content/themes/rockwell/documents/essential_report_120123.pdf">Essential Research poll</a> is unchanged on last week&#8217;s result, except that the Greens are up a point to 10 per cent &#8211; Labor is on 35 per cent, the Coalition is on 48 per cent, and two-party preferred is 54-46. Further questions relate to mandatory pre-commitment, with support at 62 per cent (one point higher than when they last asked the question in October) and opposition at 25 per cent (five points lower), and &#8220;additional&#8221; government assistance to the car industry (58 per cent support, 18 per cent oppose). As they do from time to time, Essential sought to establish whether a popular misconception played a role in the latter issue, in this case that the car industry employs more people than it actually does, but two-thirds of respondents simply said they didn&#8217;t know. Also covered: &#8220;most important roles of government&#8221;, best party to handle issues (Labor leads Liberal only on &#8220;providing support to the most disadvantaged&#8221;), and the status of manufacturing industry more generally. </p>
<p>UPDATE: We also had from Roy Morgan on Friday their occasional exercise of inquiring about the <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2012/4736/">best leader for both parties</a>, and it has Kevin Rudd&#8217;s lead over Julia Gillard widening from 31-24 to 33-19 since early November, and Malcolm Turnbull&#8217;s lead over Tony Abbott about stable (from 38-24 to 37-22). As usual, an anyone-but-the-incumbent sentiment from the parties&#8217; opponents was a considerable factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/23/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4496</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westpoll: 59-41 to Liberal-National in WA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/21/westpoll-59-41-to-liberal-national-in-wa/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/21/westpoll-59-41-to-liberal-national-in-wa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Western Australian Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labor leadership change has prompted The West Australian to commission its first Westpoll survey of state voting intention in nearly two years, and the results are all but identical to those of the Newspoll that precipitated Eric Ripper&#8217;s demise: the Labor primary vote at 29 per cent, the Liberals at 52 per cent and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Labor leadership change has prompted The West Australian to commission its first Westpoll survey of state voting intention in nearly two years, and the results are all but identical to those of the Newspoll that precipitated Eric Ripper&#8217;s demise: the Labor primary vote at 29 per cent, the Liberals at 52 per cent and the Nationals at 2 per cent, the Greens on 11 per cent, and the Liberal-Nationals two-party lead at 59-41. However, Mark McGowan has done much better on debut as preferred Premier than Eric Ripper, trailing Colin Barnett 48-33 compared to Ripper&#8217;s 59-18 in the aforementioned Newspoll. The poll also finds 20 per cent &#8220;more likely to vote Labor&#8221; after the leadership change compared with 8 per cent less likely. However, the poll (conducted by Patterson Market Research) has the usual small Westpoll sample of 400, with a margin of error approaching 5 per cent.</p>
<p>The West&#8217;s Gareth Parker also reports that Channel Seven journalist Reece Whitby, who unsuccessfully ran in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/morley.htm">Morley</a> at the 2008 election after being recruited by Alan Carpenter, now hopes to run in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/belmont.htm">Belmont</a>, which Ripper will vacate at the next election. The report says Whitby has &#8220;quietly spent the past three years attempting to bolster hims support base&#8221; in Morley, to the extent that he is now president of the party&#8217;s branch there, but he threatens to be squeezed out by <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/nollamara.htm">Nollamara</a> MP Janine Freeman&#8217;s determination to recover the seat for Labor. Meanwhile, the Fremantle Herald reports ABC TV gardening program presenter Josh Byrne has ruled himself out of contention for Labor preselection in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/fremantle.htm">Fremantle</a>. The Herald reports the preselection now looms as a three-horse race between Fremantle councillors Josh Wilson and Dave Hume, and Maritime Union of Australia deputy secretary Adrian Evans (hat tip to Frank Calabrese).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/21/westpoll-59-41-to-liberal-national-in-wa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port Adelaide and Ramsay by-elections: February 11</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/19/port-adelaide-and-ramsay-by-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/19/port-adelaide-and-ramsay-by-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SA By-Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nominations closed today for South Australia&#8217;s Port Adelaide and Ramsay by-elections (UPDATE: Apologies &#8211; Antony Green points out nominations for Ramsay are in fact open for another week), which will be held on February 11 to fill the respective vacancies of Deputy Premier Kevin Foley and Premier Mike Rann. The Liberals are not fielding candidates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nominations closed today for South Australia&#8217;s <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2010/portadelaide.htm">Port Adelaide</a> and <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2010/ramsay.htm">Ramsay</a> by-elections <i>(UPDATE: Apologies &#8211; Antony Green points out nominations for Ramsay are in fact open for another week)</i>, which will be held on February 11 to fill the respective vacancies of Deputy Premier Kevin Foley and Premier Mike Rann. The Liberals are not fielding candidates in either seat. It doesn&#8217;t say much for the Libs&#8217; confidence if they won&#8217;t back themselves in Port Adelaide, where the margin of 12.8 per cent is half what the Liberals were getting in by-elections in NSW and even in the ballpark of the Victorian Liberals&#8217; 12.3 per cent swing in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/vic2010-altona">Altona</a>. Sitting out Ramsay is a lot more understandable, as the margin there is 18.0 per cent.</p>
<p>Port Adelaide appears the more interesting of the two constests by virtue of the candidacy of Port Adelaide-Enfield mayor Gary Johanson, who according to a poll published by The Advertiser today has 23 per cent support compared with 48 per cent for the Labor candidate, 14 per cent for a LDP that clearly stands to gain from homeless or just confused Liberals, and 9 per cent for Sue Lawrie (the sample was a small 475 and the margin of error a high 4.5 per cent; a <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2011//26/essential-research-56-44-to-coalition-3/">larger sample poll</a> in September which included the Liberals as an option had Labor leading 55-45 on two-party preferred). Port Adelaide has attracted a hefty nine candidates, who are in ballot paper order:</p>
<p>Sue Lawrie (Independent): The Liberal candidate from 2010.</p>
<p>Colin Thomas (Independent Ban Live Animal Exports): Beneficiary of SA&#8217;s law allowing indepenents five words to explain themselves on the ballot paper.</p>
<p>Bob Briton (Independent Communist Australia): Un-independent communism no longer being enough of a concern to achieve registration.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Pistor (Democratic Labor Party).</p>
<p>Grant Carlin (One Nation).</p>
<p>Susan Close (Labor). Department for Environment and Natural Resources executive and Left faction convenor.</p>
<p>Justin McArthur (Greens).</p>
<p>Gary Johanson (Independent): See above.</p>
<p>Stephen Humble (Liberal Democratic Party).</p>
<p>Ramsay has attracted only four candidates, with not only Liberal but also the Greens declining to enter the fray <i>(UPDATE: As noted above, nominations hadn&#8217;t closed when I wrote this &#8211; but they have now, on January 26, so the following list is complete and in ballot paper order)</i>.</p>
<p>Mark Aldridge (Independent Voice of the Community): You can learn more about him in this post&#8217;s comments thread.</p>
<p>Ruth Beach (Greens).</p>
<p>Trevor Grace (Independent Trevor Grace Save the Unborn): Anti-abortion, would be my guess.</p>
<p>Zoe Bettison (Labor): Former state director for Labor&#8217;s public affairs firm (some prefer &#8220;spin doctors&#8221;) of choice Hawker Britton. Antony Green relates she has also been party secretary in the Northern Territory and a ministerial adviser in the NT government, government relations manager at Great Southern Rail, and that she got her start with the Right faction Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association.</p>
<p>Chris Walsh (One Nation).</p>
<p>Mark Lena (Free Australia).</p>
<p>Christopher Steele (Liberal Democrats).</p>
<p>More detail available from <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/elections/sa/2012/ramsayportadelaide/rams.htm">Antony Green</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/19/port-adelaide-and-ramsay-by-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ripper out, McGowan in</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/18/ripper-out-mcgowan-in/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/18/ripper-out-mcgowan-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Western Australian Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is being universally reported that Eric Ripper will officially stand aside as leader of WA&#8217;s Labor opposition today, with Rockingham MP Mark McGowan to fill the vacancy unopposed. Ripper had survived as Opposition Leader for three years and three months since assuming the position in the aftermath of the 2008 election &#8211; not bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is being universally reported that Eric Ripper will officially stand aside as leader of WA&#8217;s Labor opposition today, with <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/rockingham.htm">Rockingham</a> MP Mark McGowan to fill the vacancy unopposed. Ripper had survived as Opposition Leader for three years and three months since assuming the position in the aftermath of the 2008 election &#8211; not bad going by modern standards. However, polling throughout the term has consistently indicated that Labor has failed to seriously trouble the government, and a post-CHOGM blowout in the Liberal lead to 59-41 in the Newspoll published on January 6 may have been the last straw.</p>
<p>The decisive moment came on Friday when Ripper was told he had lost the support of the seven-member &#8220;Missos&#8221; Left, including the party&#8217;s lower house deputy Roger Cook and upper house leader Sue Ellery (not to mention United Voice a.k.a. LHMWU state secretary Dave Kelly). This development activated the latent opposition to Ripper among the eight-member element of the Right which had supported Ben Wyatt&#8217;s abortive challenge last year, which included both the mooted contenders &#8211; McGowan and Peter Tinley. While some who didn&#8217;t like the idea of the former evidently gave encouragement to the latter, Tinley simplified matters by declaring himself too inexperienced. There were also at least three members of the &#8220;Metallies&#8221; Left (Mick Murray, Fran Logan and David Templeman) who saw things the same way as the Missos, together with factional independents Tom Stephens (a long-standing Ripper foe) and Tony Buti.</p>
<p>This collectively made for at least 19 members willing to back McGowan over Ripper out of a caucus of 37. The tipping point having been reached, by yesterday any holdouts among the Metallies faction had come round to Ripper. Ripper&#8217;s only remaining loyalists were the &#8220;New Right&#8221; faction, which is an alliance built around Michelle Roberts and the &#8220;Shoppies&#8221; Right, together with Ripper himself and his partner Ljiljanna Ravlich (once colleagues in the now barely existent Centre faction). The West Australian today reports that Ripper retained 12 supporters in total, so I presume by process of elimination this must have included one out of Adele Farina (who has a background in the Centre) and Linda Savage (an independent).</p>
<p>Part of the steady drip of bad news for Ripper was Monday&#8217;s announcement by <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/bassendean.htm">Bassendean</a> MP Martin Whitely that he would not seek another term, which came with a suggestion that Ripper should follow his example. Whitely further complained of &#8220;factional bullies who have tried to end my career on two previous occasions&#8221;. One of those he may well have been referring to, the aforementioned Dave Kelly of the Missos, was tipped by <a href="http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/12626233">Gary Adshead of The West Australian</a> yesterday as a possible successor to his seat. Adshead also identifies the proposal which has been floated for <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/nollamara.htm">Nollamara</a> MP Janine Freeman (whose seat has been renamed Mirrabooka in the redistribution) to recover <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/morley.htm">Morley</a> from the Liberals as being motivated by a desire to gain a further seat for the Missos, and further reports the faction has designs on Ripper&#8217;s own seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/wa2008/belmont.htm">Belmont</a>. It had earlier been reported the seat might be of interest to state secretary Simon Mead, who is also associated with the faction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/18/ripper-out-mcgowan-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential Research: 54-46 to Coalition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/16/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/16/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics 2010-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=9540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bernard Keane at Crikey reports the first Essential Research poll for the year has the two-party vote at the same place as the final poll last year, with the Coalition leading 54-46. Also featured are leaders&#8217; personal ratings which you can read about at the link. More to follow. UPDATE: Full post here. The voting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/16/essential-warmer-months-but-voters-still-cold-on-leaders/">Bernard Keane at Crikey</a> reports the first Essential Research poll for the year has the two-party vote at the same place as the final poll last year, with the Coalition leading 54-46. Also featured are leaders&#8217; personal ratings which you can read about at the link. More to follow.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Full post <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2012/01/Essential-Report_120116a.pdf">here</a>. The voting intention figures are a rolling average of the last result last year and the first result this year &#8211; Essential advises me that in both periods the result was 54-46. Results to questions on leadership approval are derived as always from this week&#8217;s sample only. Both leaders are up three on approval and down two on disapproval since a month ago, Julia Gillard to 37 per cent and 52 per cent, Tony Abbott to 35 per cent and 51 per cent. Preferred prime minister is little changed, Gillard&#8217;s lead going from 39-35 to 39-36. It should be noted that polls conducted over the new year period are often thought to be unreliable, although neither Essential nor Morgan has produced anything out of the ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2012/01/16/essential-research-54-46-to-coalition-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5645</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

