<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Poll Bludger &#187; NSW Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/tag/nsw-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 54-46 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/19/newspoll-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/19/newspoll-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of state voting intention in New South Wales (sample size 1266) is a status quo result in every particular, although the Coalition&#8217;s two-party lead is down from 55-45 to 54-46. On the primary vote, Labor is up one to 32 per cent, Liberal up one to 37 per cent, Nationals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of <a href="http://www.newspoll.com.au/image_uploads/0805%20NSW%2019_08_2009.pdf">state voting intention in New South Wales</a> (sample size 1266) is a status quo result in every particular, although the Coalition&#8217;s two-party lead is down from 55-45 to 54-46. On the primary vote, Labor is up one to 32 per cent, Liberal up one to 37 per cent, Nationals down one to 4 per cent and the Greens steady on 14 per cent. Nathan Rees is up on both approval (three points to 33 per cent) and disapproval (two points to 51 per cent), as is Barry O&#8217;Farrell (approval and disapproval both up two from 34 per cent to 36 per cent). The preferred premier rating has nudged from 33-32 in Rees&#8217;s favour to 33-32 in O&#8217;Farrell&#8217;s favour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/19/newspoll-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan: 60.5-39.5</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/08/morgan-605-395-5/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/08/morgan-605-395-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alison Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankstown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belinda Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blaxland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danna Vale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gosford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Della Bosca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marie Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McMahon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Rees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parramatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robertson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two polls from Morgan, which as ever moves in mysterious ways. Without question the headline finding is the face-to-face poll of 1832 respondents conducted over the previous two weekends, showing a healthy spike in Labor&#8217;s two-party lead to 60.5-39.5 from 57.5-42.5 at the previous such poll. The 574-sample phone poll was probably conducted to get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2009/4404/">Two polls from Morgan</a>, which as ever moves in mysterious ways. Without question the headline finding is the face-to-face poll of 1832 respondents conducted over the previous two weekends, showing a healthy spike in Labor&#8217;s two-party lead to 60.5-39.5 from 57.5-42.5 at the previous such poll. The 574-sample phone poll was probably conducted to get more bang from their buck out of some other survey they were conducting for some other reason. It shows Labor&#8217;s lead at a more modest 57-43. Furthermore:</p>
<p>&#8226; Northern Territory MP Alison Anderson, on whose whim (along with fellow independent Gerry Wood) hangs the future of Paul Henderson&#8217;s floundering government, has advised that Tuesday will be nothing less than &#8220;<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/08/06/2648191.htm">the biggest day in Territory history</a>&#8221;, which should alarm survivors of Cyclone Tracy and the 1942 air raids. Tuesday was to be the day Anderson would make known her attitude to the government&#8217;s future, but it&#8217;s presumably been brought forward a day now that Speaker Jane Aagaard has agreed to a request from Anderson, Wood and the CLP for parliament to resume on Monday. Notice will then be given of a no-confidence motion on Friday, which if successful &#8211; and given the pitch of Anderson&#8217;s rhetoric, any other outcome would be an enormous anti-climax &#8211; will result in either a new election or an immediate transfer of power to the Terry Mills-led CLP. The procedure for such a motion was established late last year in legislation establishing fixed four-year terms, which like similar legislation in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia provides for an escape clause in the event of no-confidence or blocked supply. As <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2009/08/fixed-term-parliaments-face-test-in-northern-territory.html">Antony Green</a> explains, it thus marks a test case for the aforementioned states, which have never experienced such a situation in the fixed term era. If the motion passes, the parliament will have eight days to back an alternative government, after which the Administrator will have the authority to issue writs for an election which the Chief Minister will be obliged to advise. The government&#8217;s ongoing crisis reached its current pitch on Tuesday when Anderson quit the ALP &#8211; not as she foreshadowed due to dissatisfaction with the government&#8217;s handling of an indigenous housing program, but because she blamed Henderson for an <a href="http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2009/08/01/72281_ntnews.html">allegedly racist article</a> about her and other indigenous MPs in Saturday&#8217;s edition of the Northern Territory News. The same day saw <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nt2008.htm#arafura">Arafura</a> MP Marion Scrymgour return to the Labor fold after two months of independence, leaving the numbers at Labor 12, CLP 11, independents two. While Anderson&#8217;s tone of certainty might be taken as a clue, Wood&#8217;s precise attitude remains unclear: although of presumably conservative sympathies, he has expressed concern at the CLP&#8217;s readiness to govern, and was quoted this week saying an election was &#8220;certainly an option&#8221;. Anderson tells <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25894350-5013404,00.html">The Australian</a> her gauge of the public mood is that there is &#8220;a push for an election so that they can teach Hendo a lesson&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8226; Talk of John Della Bosca challenging Nathan Rees for the New South Wales premiership has focused attention on the theoretical prospect of a leader sitting in the upper house. While dismissive of the rumours, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25897563-2702,00.html">Imre Salusinszky of The Australian</a> muses that Della Bosca &#8220;could serve a symbolic first 100 days in the Legislative Council and hope to have gained sufficient traction by that point to make the switch feasible&#8221;. He also notes that in the current environment, no lower house seat is so safe for Labor that Della Bosca could be guaranteed to win a by-election even if a sitting member agreed to make way. The <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/ready-to-rumble-20090806-ebj7.html">Sydney Morning Herald</a> reports party operatives hope Della Bosca can assume <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/bankstown.htm">Bankstown</a> from Tony Stewart by forging a deal in which Stewart receives an apology for his sacking over an incident involving a staff member last year, for which he is suing the government. <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/opinion/editorial/new-premier-or-not-what-we-need-is-better-performance-20090807-ecuz.html">Another Herald report</a> mentions <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/riverstone.htm">Riverstone</a>, where John Aquilina has said he will not contest the next election. Della Bosca&#8217;s home patch, <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/gosford.htm">Gosford</a>, is deemed unsuitable in part due to the lingering local unpopularity of his wife Belinda Neal following the Iguana&#8217;s episode, but also because it is too marginal and sitting member Marie Andrews would be unwilling to make way in any case. The Herald reports that a move to Bankstown &#8220;could pave the way for a graceful exit from politics for Ms Neal&#8221;, who is unlikely to retain preselection in her Gosford-based federal seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/robertson.htm">Robertson</a>. It will be recalled that when Barrie Unsworth was parachuted into <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/rockdale.htm">Rockdale</a> at a 1986 by-election to assume the premiership upon Neville Wran&#8217;s retirement, he suffered a 17 per cent dive in the primary vote and came within 54 votes of defeat. In May, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25547825-7583,00.html">Malcolm Mackerras</a> wrote an article in The Australian decrying what he saw as the outdated convention that places leaders in the lower house, complaining that &#8220;New South Wales has Nathan Rees as Premier when John Della Bosca should be premier&#8221;, and suggesting the federal Liberals &#8220;should replace Julie Bishop as its federal deputy leader with Senator Nick Minchin and explicitly not ask Minchin to transfer to the House of Representatives&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8226; <a href="http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/houserules/index.php/theaustralian/comments/letting_people_have_their_say_may_help/">Christian Kerr of The Australian</a> notes the British Conservatives have &#8220;turned a PR disaster into a triumph&#8221; by conducting an American-style open primary to choose the successor to one of many MPs disgraced in the country&#8217;s expenses scandal. Having done so, the party has given &#8220;everyone in the constituency a stake in the success of their candidate&#8221;. The New South Wales Nationals have decided to hold such a vote in one yet-to-be-chosen seat for the next state election.</p>
<p>&#8226; Antony Green comments on the potential availability of <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2009/08/does-labor-have-nine-potential-double-dissolution-triggers.html">various double dissolution triggers</a>, and on the <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2009/07/avoiding-a-double-dissolution-and-the-new-liberal-position-on-cprs.html">Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme bill</a> in particular, where the Coalition appears to be playing a good hand with its apparent plan to oppose it at the second reading.</p>
<p>&#8226; Danna Vale, Liberal member for the southern Sydney seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/hughes.htm">Hughes</a>, has announced she will <a href="http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/danna-vale-to-quit-politics-at-next-poll-20090804-e8iu.html">quit at the next election</a>. The margin in Hughes was cut from 8.6 per cent to 2.2 per cent at the 2007 election, and by Antony Green&#8217;s reckoning the redistribution proposal unveiled yesterday will further reduce it to 1.1 per cent &#8211; less than a sitting member&#8217;s personal vote is generally reckoned to be worth. No word yet on who might be up for the tough task of keeping the seat in the Liberal fold.</p>
<p>&#8226; The Victorian Parliament&#8217;s Electoral Matters Committee has <a href="http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/emc/Inquiry%20into%20Voter%20Participation/Full%20report%20-%20voter%20participation%20and%20informal%20voting.pdf">published a report</a> recommending that consideration be given to adopting the weighted inclusive Gregory method for surplus transfers in upper house elections, as opposed to the (non-weighted) inclusive Gregory method currently employed both in Victoria and for the Senate. Under weighted inclusive Gregory, which was introduced in Western Australia at the last election, the system achieves mathematical perfection of a sort with every individual vote cut up and distributed among the final quotas at equal value. The inclusive Gregory method saves time, but it means individual votes which are used in surplus transfers more than once in the count are inflated in value on the second and subsequent occasions. Usually only small handfuls of votes are involved, but like anything these could be decisive in the event of a close result.</p>
<p>&#8226; The abolition of Laurie Ferguson&#8217;s Sydney seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/reid.htm">Reid</a> threatens an interesting Labor preselection for one of the seats which have moved into its turf: <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/parramatta.htm">Parramatta</a>, <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/blaxland.htm">Blaxland</a> and McMahon, as <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/lowe.htm">Lowe</a> has been renamed. Antony Green has composed what promises to be a <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2009/08/federal-redistributions-the-big-picture.html">headline-grabbing post</a> noting that the New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australian redistributions (only proposals in the first two cases) have between them given Labor a notional boost of five seats. Those wishing to discuss these matters are asked to do so on the <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/07/nsw-redistribution-thread/">New South Wales redistribution thread</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/08/08/morgan-605-395-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>777</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 55-45 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/23/newspoll-55-45-to-coalition-in-nsw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/23/newspoll-55-45-to-coalition-in-nsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest bi-monthly New South Wales state Newspoll has the Coalition increasing its lead after a Labor recovery in previous surveys, from 53-47 to 55-45 in two-party terms. Labor&#8217;s primary vote is down two points to a parlous 31 per cent &#8211; particularly dangerous territory under optional preferetial voting &#8211; while the Coalition is up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/23jun-nswnewspoll.html">latest bi-monthly New South Wales state Newspoll</a> has the Coalition increasing its lead after a Labor recovery in previous surveys, from 53-47 to 55-45 in two-party terms. Labor&#8217;s primary vote is down two points to a parlous 31 per cent &#8211; particularly dangerous territory under optional preferetial voting &#8211; while the Coalition is up a point to 41 per cent. The Greens are up a point to 14 per cent, while &#8220;others&#8221; is steady on 14 per cent. Nathan Rees has recorded his worst personal ratings yet, his approval down four to 30 per cent his disapproval up three to 49 per cent. Barry O&#8217;Farrell is respectively down one to 34 per cent and down three 34 per cent. For all that, the two are effectively level on preferred leader, Rees maintaining a one point edge with 33 per cent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/06/23/newspoll-55-45-to-coalition-in-nsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taverner: 54-46 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/05/31/taverner-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/05/31/taverner-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry O'Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carmel Tebbutt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Sartor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristina Keneally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Rees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taverner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sun Herald has published a Taverner poll showing the Coalition leading 54-46 in New South Wales, bearing in mind that two-party results can be a bit askew under the state&#8217;s optional preferential voting system. That being so, it&#8217;s more than usually unfortunate that no primary vote figures are provided. Barry O&#8217;Farrell leads Nathan Rees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sun Herald has published a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/rees-losing-grip-on-power-20090530-br1m.html">Taverner poll</a> showing the Coalition leading 54-46 in New South Wales, bearing in mind that two-party results can be a bit askew under the state&#8217;s optional preferential voting system. That being so, it&#8217;s more than usually unfortunate that no primary vote figures are provided. Barry O&#8217;Farrell leads Nathan Rees as preferred premier 50 per cent to 33 per cent. A question on alternative Labor leaders found 20 per cent support for Carmel Tebbutt (who looks likely to face a strong challenge from the Greens in her seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/marrickville.htm">Marrickville</a>), 10 per cent for Frank Sartor and 7 per cent for Kristina Keneally. There are further responses on individual issues, all of it bad news for Labor. No sample size is provided, which is poor form &#8211; it&#8217;s bad enough that Australian newspapers don&#8217;t discuss the margin of error &#8211; but past experience suggests it was on the low side, maybe around 600.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Oz in comments reports the sample was but 500, according to the print edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/05/31/taverner-54-46-to-coalition-in-nsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 53-47 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/04/30/newspoll-53-47-to-coalition-in-nsw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/04/30/newspoll-53-47-to-coalition-in-nsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry O'Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Rees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=3210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian reports the latest bi-monthly NSW state Newspoll shows the Labor government continuing to narrow the gap after the post-mini-budget blowout to 59-41 reported in November-December. The Coalition now leads 53-47, down from 56-44 in January-February. Labor&#8217;s primary vote has struggled up to 33 per cent, up from 26 per cent in November-December and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Australian reports the latest bi-monthly NSW <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25406752-601,00.html">state Newspoll</a> shows the Labor government continuing to narrow the gap after the post-mini-budget blowout to 59-41 reported in November-December. The Coalition now leads 53-47, down from 56-44 in January-February. Labor&#8217;s primary vote has struggled up to 33 per cent, up from 26 per cent in November-December and 30 per cent in January-February, while the Coalition is down two points to 40 per cent. Beyond that we&#8217;re only told that both Nathan Rees&#8217;s and Barry O&#8217;Farrell&#8217;s dissatisfaction ratings have &#8220;spiked&#8221; &#8211; Rees&#8217;s from 42 per cent to 46 per cent. More to follow.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Graphic <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/30apr-nswpoll2.jpg">here</a>. Rees&#8217;s approval rating is down three to 34 per cent, which is where it was in November-December. However, Barry O&#8217;Farrell&#8217;s disapproval rating (37 per cent) exceeds his approval (35 per cent) for the first time. O&#8217;Farrell has nonetheless narrowed the gap as preferred premier from 34-29 to 33-31.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/04/30/newspoll-53-47-to-coalition-in-nsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 56-44 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/03/03/newspoll-56-44-to-coalition-in-nsw-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/03/03/newspoll-56-44-to-coalition-in-nsw-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry O'Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Rees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of NSW state voting intention shows a slight recovery for Labor from the disastrous November-December result, while still pointing to a Coalition landslide. Labor&#8217;s primary vote is up four points from the last survey&#8217;s record low 26 per cent, while the Coalition is down one point to 42 per cent. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of NSW state voting intention shows a slight recovery for Labor from the disastrous November-December result, while still pointing to a Coalition landslide. Labor&#8217;s primary vote is up four points from the last survey&#8217;s record low 26 per cent, while the Coalition is down one point to 42 per cent. The Coalition&#8217;s two-party lead has moderated from 59-41 to 56-44. Nathan Rees has regained the lead over Barry O&#8217;Farrell as preferred premier, leading 34-29 after trailing 30-33 last time (although what really stands out is that 37 per cent are uncommitted). Rees&#8217; approval rating is up three points to 37 per cent, and his disapproval is down five to 42 per cent. O&#8217;Farrell&#8217;s ratings are said to be &#8220;steady&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/03/03/newspoll-56-44-to-coalition-in-nsw-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 54-46</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/01/19/newspoll-54-46-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/01/19/newspoll-54-46-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmanian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationals primaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Wriedt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Newspoll survey after the end-of-year break shows the Coalition recovering to 54-46 after the shock 59-41 result of December 9. The Australian spruiks this as the Coalition clawing back support, but a more likely explanation is that the previous poll was a rogue. Kevin Rudd&#8217;s lead as preferred prime minister is down from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24934531-601,00.html">Newspoll survey</a> after the end-of-year break shows the Coalition recovering to 54-46 after the shock 59-41 result of December 9. The Australian spruiks this as the Coalition clawing back support, but a more likely explanation is that the previous poll was a rogue. Kevin Rudd&#8217;s lead as preferred prime minister is down from 66-19 to 60-22.</p>
<p><i>UPDATE: Graphic <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspoll-20jan.jpg">here</a>. Rudd&#8217;s approval is down seven points to 63 per cent; Turnbull&#8217;s is down two to 45 per cent, his weakest result to date.</i></p>
<p>Elsewhere:</p>
<p>&#8226; Essential Research&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2009/01/essential-report_190109.pdf">weekly survey</a> has produced a status quo 59-41 result, along with a 56-20 preferred prime minister lead for Kevin Rudd that marks little shift from the previous time the question was asked in late November. Also featured are questions on expectations of the year ahead economically and for the Barack Obama presidency. Most interestingly, respondents were also asked to name their favourite prime minister since World War II, which produced a win for John Howard on 28 per cent. This is largely because those supporting Liberals (45 per cent of the total) showed no interest for contenders other than Howard and Bob Menzies (11 per cent), whereas the Labor loyalist vote was split between Kevin Rudd (20 per cent), Bob Hawke (12 per cent), Gough Whitlam (9 per cent) and Paul Keating (8 per cent). </p>
<p>&#8226; Former Tasmanian Tourism Minister Paula Wreidt has <a href="http://www.themercury.com.au/article/2009/01/19/50361_tasmania-news.html">retired from politics</a>, creating a vacancy in the electorate of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/tas2006.htm#franklin">Franklin</a> that will be filled by a countback on February 2. This provides a clear entry to parliament for Daniel Hulme, the only remaining unelected Labor candidate from the 2006 election. My election guide entry tells me Hulme was an &#8220;Australian Taxation Office worker and former Young Labor president described by Sue Neales of The Mercury as a &#8216;right-wing pro-development campaigner&#8217;&#8221;. Hulme was the last man standing after Paul Lennon&#8217;s exit in the middle of last year resulted in the election of Ross Butler &#8211; who, according to <a href="http://tasmanianpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/10/will-ross-butler-get-re-elected-part-2.html">Peter Tucker at Tasmanian Politics</a>, has raised eyebrows with his performance. If Hulme declines to nominate, or if any further Labor vacancies arise in Franklin before the next election, we might see the unprecedented activation of the clause which would allow Labor to initiate a by-election rather than have the seat go to another party. Still more from <a href="http://tasmanianpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/01/wriedt-out-hulme-in.html">Peter Tucker</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; More casual vacancy news: the last remaining Australian Democrats MP, South Australia&#8217;s Sandra Kanck, has been replaced following her retirement from her upper house seat by <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/water-for-sa-is-focus-of-new-sa-democrat-20090119-7k83.html">David Winderlich</a>. More from <a href="http://andrewbartlett.com/?p=7172">Andrew Bartlett</a>.</p>
<p>&#8226; The NSW Nationals have intriguingly announced they will preselect a candidate for a yet-to-be-determined winnable seat at the 2011 state election by conducting an American-style primary, open to all voters enrolled in the electorate. <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24922199-7583,00.html">Peter van Onselen notes in The Australian</a> that &#8220;parties in countries such as Britain and Italy have increasingly embraced primary contests, more often than not with electoral success to follow&#8221;. The most likely electorates for the trial are said to be <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/dubbo.htm">Dubbo</a>, <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/portmacquarie.htm">Port Macquarie</a> and <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/tamworth.htm">Tamworth</a>, each traditionally Nationals seats currently held by independents.</p>
<p>&#8226; Counting continues in South Australia&#8217;s Frome by-election, on which I have written an overview in <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20090119-Frome-by-election-Can-Brock-close-the-gap.html">today&#8217;s Crikey</a>. Read about and comment on the progress of the count in the post below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/01/19/newspoll-54-46-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>850</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 59-41 to Coalition in NSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/16/newspoll-59-41-to-coalition-in-nsw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/16/newspoll-59-41-to-coalition-in-nsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry O'Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Rees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of state voting intention in New South Wales is nothing short of a catastrophe for Nathan Rees&#8217;s government. In the wake of last month&#8217;s mini-budget, which cut against the federal government&#8217;s economic strategy with a range of tax hikes and spending cuts, Labor&#8217;s primary vote has slumped to 26 per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest bi-monthly Newspoll survey of <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24806144-601,00.html">state voting intention</a> in New South Wales is nothing short of a catastrophe for Nathan Rees&#8217;s government. In the wake of last month&#8217;s mini-budget, which cut against the federal government&#8217;s economic strategy with a range of tax hikes and spending cuts, Labor&#8217;s primary vote has slumped to 26 per cent from 29 per cent in the last survey &#8211; which was itself the worst Newspoll result ever recorded by either major party in New South Wales if the Liberals and Nationals are taken together. Rees&#8217;s relatively encouraging personal ratings from the previous survey have evaporated: his dissatisfaction rating has rocketed from 26 per cent to 47 per cent, while his satisfaction is down five points to 34 per cent. Barry O&#8217;Farrell now leads as preferred premier, though not by a sufficient margin (33 per cent to 30 per cent) to douse talk about Joe Hockey being drafted to replace him. Tellingly, Newspoll saw fit to ask if the government should be allowed to serve out its full term &#8211; 49 per cent said it should, which is less than the Whitlam government was getting in response to similar questions in late 1975. The Greens are up three points to 14 per cent, a further indication they stand poised to win seats in the lower house for the first time. The chart below shows the primary vote across all Newspoll and election results going back to Newspoll&#8217;s foundation in 1985.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2008/12/161008newspollnsw.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/files/2008/12/161008newspollnsw.jpg" alt="" title="161008newspollnsw" width="483" height="291" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2345" /></a></p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/12/more-bad-pollin.html">Antony Green</a> employs the good old-fashioned uniform two-party swing method to calculate which Labor seats would fall to the Coalition if the result of this poll was borne out. However, Antony concedes that &#8220;with a third of voters off with the Greens and &#8216;Others&#8217;, more than admitting they will vote Labor, I&#8217;m not sure that analysis based on uniform 2-party swing is very useful&#8221;. That being so, I&#8217;ve taken a different approach: changing the results in each electorate in proportion to the shift indicated in the poll and applying the same preference distributions as last time. No doubt this is statistically clumsy, but accepting the exercise as a bit of fun (unless you&#8217;re one of the dwindling band of Labor loyalists), here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve come up with. Coalition gains from Labor: Camden, Cessnock, Drummoyne, Gosford, Granville, Heathcote, Londonderry, Macquarie Fields, Maitland, Menai, Miranda, Monaro, Mulgoa, Penrith, Riverstone, Rockdale, Ryde, Swansea, The Entrance, Wollondilly, Wyong. Greens gains from Labor: Balmain, Coogee, Heffron, Marrickville. Independent gains from Labor, should the relevant candidates choose to run again: Charlestown (Paul Scarfe) and Newcastle (John Tate). Result: Coalition 55, Labor 25, Independents 9, Greens 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/12/16/newspoll-59-41-to-coalition-in-nsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green growths</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/20/green-growths/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/20/green-growths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victorian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronwyn Pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carmel Tebbutt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Wynne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Tanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verity Firth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=1694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a little something I wrote for today&#8217;s Crikey email but failed to get finished in time for the deadline &#8230;
The main lessons from Saturday&#8217;s ACT election and NSW by-elections can be heard loud and clear from the news headlines, and could indeed have been ascertained even before the figures came in. After suffering the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Here&#8217;s a little something I wrote for today&#8217;s Crikey email but failed to get finished in time for the deadline &#8230;</i></p>
<p>The main lessons from Saturday&#8217;s ACT election and NSW by-elections can be heard loud and clear from the news headlines, and could indeed have been ascertained even before the figures came in. After suffering the two worst by-election swings in NSW history in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/ryde.htm">Ryde</a> and <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/cabramatta.htm">Cabramatta</a>, there is no coming back for the fourth-term Labor government. The ACT election further emphasised that Labor&#8217;s state and territory governments are marching in lock-step towards the wrong end of the electoral cycle. While Jon Stanhope is likely to continue in government with the support of the Greens, Labor&#8217;s vote was down a numbing 9.3 per cent to 37.6 per cent. There were also intimations over the weekend that South Australia&#8217;s government is becoming conscious of its mortality, with talk of Treasurer Kevin Foley plotting a move against Premier Mike Rann.</p>
<p>The ACT election provided further support for the other recurring theme of recent state and territory elections: the growing strength of the Greens. The party is certain to hold the balance of power for the first time after its vote went up 6.6 per cent to 15.8 per cent, securing a definite three seats out of 17 and perhaps even a fourth. While the Greens&#8217; more excitable partisans might interpret this as the tide of history leading the party on to fortune, past experience suggests a more mundane explanation. After a few terms in office, Labor governments often find themselves facing disaffection among voters of an idealistic persuasion, resulting in loss of support to minor parties and independents. The hard-edged economic reforms of the 1980s produced a bonanza for independents when Labor lost office in NSW in 1988, and compelled the Hawke government to make its famous pitch for Greens and Democrats preferences as its primary vote sank in 1990.</p>
<p>Now that there&#8217;s a monopoly trader in the market for disaffected left-wing votes, the Greens are presenting Labor with a perfect storm at the next round of state elections. They thus stand poised to fulfil long-cherished but never quite realised ambitions for lower house seats. Since the threat to Labor is in their traditional inner-city strongholds, the victims could include some very senior figures. In NSW, the Greens need to gain only 3.2 per cent on Labor to claim the scalp of Education Minister Verity Firth in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/balmain.htm">Balmain</a>, which Dawn Fraser won as an independent the last time Labor lost office. On current form, that would seem to be an absolute certainty. <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/nsw2007/marrickville.htm">Marrickville</a> could also go if the fall in Labor&#8217;s vote approaches double figures, which would put Deputy Premier Carmel Tebbutt out of a job. While things aren&#8217;t looking quite so grim for Labor south of the border, it&#8217;s clear the Victorian party&#8217;s vote in 2010 will not reach the landslide proportions of 2002 and 2006. That means big trouble for another Education Minister in Bronwyn Pike, who needed a feverish last-week campaigning effort in 2006 to retain a 2.0 per cent margin in her seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/vic2006/melbourne.htm">Melbourne</a>. Also at risk are Housing and Local Government Minister Richard Wynne in <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/vic2006/richmond.htm">Richmond</a> (margin 3.6 per cent), along with back-benchers Carlo Carli (<a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/vic2006/brunswick.htm">Brunswick</a>, 4.6 per cent) and Fiona Richardson (<a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/vic2006/northcote.htm">Northcote</a>, 8.5 per cent).</p>
<p>Then there’s the risk that the phenomenon might go federal, as suggested by the recent Newspoll showing Greens support at 13 per cent. Such figures would be viewed nervously by Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner, who last November watched a Greens candidate take second place for the first time at a general election in his seat of <a href="http://www.pollbludger.com/fed2007/melbourne.htm">Melbourne</a>. This continued a trend of ominously mounting Greens support in Melbourne going back three elections: 6.1 per cent in 1998, 15.7 per cent in 2001, 19.0 per cent in 2004, 22.8 per cent in 2007. Tanner’s primary vote of 49.5 per cent kept him out of danger, but this was achieved at the peak of Labor’s electoral cycle. It’s not hard to conceive a scenario where the Rudd government pursues votes in the electorally decisive outer suburbs at the expense of the values held dear in the inner-city, which could place Tanner in serious jeopardy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/20/green-growths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSW by-elections live</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/nsw-by-elections-live/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/nsw-by-elections-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NSW By-Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabramatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakemba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Macquarie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryde]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=1602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7.51pm. The NSWEC has all but a few booths in from Port Macquarie, and you can now clearly call it for Peter Besseling, who leads the Nationals candidate 36.8 per cent to 31.9 per cent. Elsewhere it&#8217;s clear the results are as expected: a big win for the Liberals in Ryde, and narrower wins for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.51pm. The NSWEC has all but a few booths in from Port Macquarie, and you can now clearly call it for Peter Besseling, who leads the Nationals candidate 36.8 per cent to 31.9 per cent. Elsewhere it&#8217;s clear the results are as expected: a big win for the Liberals in Ryde, and narrower wins for Labor in Cabramatta and Lakemba following swings of over 20 per cent.</p>
<p>7.30pm. With 22.4 per cent counted, Besseling 37.6 per cent and Nationals 31.9 per cent, so Besseling home and hosed unless these are very good Nationals booths outstanding.</p>
<p>7.26pm. Labor&#8217;s lead now up to 5.7 per cent in Cabramatta according to the ABC. Still no actual prefernece counts in yet.</p>
<p>7.24pm. Seven booths out of 21 counted on the primary vote in Ryde, and that Taverner poll is looking good: Liberal on 62 per cent of the two-party vote.</p>
<p>7.23pm. ABC computer has Besseling leading by 1.2 per cent in Port Macquarie, but with no notional preference counts in yet this is based on assumptions about preferences.</p>
<p>7.21pm. The ABC computer is now up to speed on the Cabramatta count: Labor is facing a 24 per cent swing, but that leaves them with 5 per cent to spare.</p>
<p>7.14pm. No real trouble for Labor in Lakemba, with 59.2 per cent after a third of the booths counted.</p>
<p>7.11pm. NSWEC has eight booths counted in Cabramatta, Labor leading 48.0 per cent to 40.4 per cent, so Nick Lalich is not actually in trouble. Liberals on 54.9 per cent in Ryde with over a third of the booths counted, so an obvious win for them there.</p>
<p>7.08pm. Comments tells me Cabramatta &#8220;tightening&#8221;, but ABC computer still only has one booth. NSWEC website most unwieldy (PDFs? Come on &#8230;).</p>
<p>7.00pm. Nine booths in and 6 per cent counted in Port Macquarie, and looking ominous for the Nationals, who trail Besseling 35.0 per cent to 32.9 per cent on the primary vote. Still nothing from Ryde.</p>
<p>6.55pm. Labor looking at an ugly swing in Cabramatta of over 20 per cent, but not enough to cost them the seat.</p>
<p>6.50pm. Commenter Oakeshott Country, who knows his Port Macquarie onions backwards, says the three small booths in so far suggest a very close result between the Nationals candidate Leslie Williams and independent Peter Besseling.</p>
<p>6.42pm. Riverwood booth in from Lakemba. Labor vote on 55.3 per cent, which suggests a 20 per cent drop.</p>
<p>6.20pm. Booths closed 20 minutes ago. First results should be in shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/10/18/nsw-by-elections-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>206</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
