<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pollytrack November 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/19/pollytrack-november-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/19/pollytrack-november-19/</link>
	<description>Politics, elections and piffle plinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:43:07 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aristotle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/19/pollytrack-november-19/comment-page-1/#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=2800#comment-11330</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know quite what to make of Essential Research.  They are new to us here, so it will take a few years before we have a track record from them.

As for this shift in results from them, a couple more weeks of results will either wash a rogue out of the system or re-set their benchmarks alongside the other pollsters, except for Morgan, who will remain more ALP friendly.(mostly)

Until then, we will have to take the results at face value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know quite what to make of Essential Research.  They are new to us here, so it will take a few years before we have a track record from them.</p>
<p>As for this shift in results from them, a couple more weeks of results will either wash a rogue out of the system or re-set their benchmarks alongside the other pollsters, except for Morgan, who will remain more ALP friendly.(mostly)</p>
<p>Until then, we will have to take the results at face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/19/pollytrack-november-19/comment-page-1/#comment-11329</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=2800#comment-11329</guid>
		<description>With Pollytrack, if we removed Essential Report, the TPP would be slightly less volatile up until around June, and about 0.75 points more favourable to the Coalition on average - with the exception of the current observation where Essential is the same as the Phone Pollsters.

If we removed Morgan Face to Face it would be a slightly larger reduction in the ALP TPP vote.

Using our regressions, Essential added about a point on to Labor and Morgan Face to Face about 1 to 1.4 points there abouts. Neither added much in the way of volatility to the low sensitivity regression line, but added nearly all of the movement to the high sensitivity line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Pollytrack, if we removed Essential Report, the TPP would be slightly less volatile up until around June, and about 0.75 points more favourable to the Coalition on average &#8211; with the exception of the current observation where Essential is the same as the Phone Pollsters.</p>
<p>If we removed Morgan Face to Face it would be a slightly larger reduction in the ALP TPP vote.</p>
<p>Using our regressions, Essential added about a point on to Labor and Morgan Face to Face about 1 to 1.4 points there abouts. Neither added much in the way of volatility to the low sensitivity regression line, but added nearly all of the movement to the high sensitivity line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltep</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/19/pollytrack-november-19/comment-page-1/#comment-11328</link>
		<dc:creator>ltep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=2800#comment-11328</guid>
		<description>If we removed the EMC polling from the equation altogether would the resulting tracking lines look substantially different?  I would imagine they would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we removed the EMC polling from the equation altogether would the resulting tracking lines look substantially different?  I would imagine they would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
