<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan Face to Face polls vs. other phone polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/28/morgan-face-to-face-polls-vs-other-phone-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/28/morgan-face-to-face-polls-vs-other-phone-polls/</link>
	<description>Politics, elections and piffle plinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:43:07 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Hat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/28/morgan-face-to-face-polls-vs-other-phone-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-11392</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=2883#comment-11392</guid>
		<description>Poss what has Speaker Harry Jenkins got against you? and why did he have to kill you and the missus?

http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/calm-amid-the-shonks-spivs-and-sharks/2008/11/28/1227491828094.html

ps can anyone explain that picture&#039;s significance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poss what has Speaker Harry Jenkins got against you? and why did he have to kill you and the missus?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/calm-amid-the-shonks-spivs-and-sharks/2008/11/28/1227491828094.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/calm-amid-the-shonks-spivs-and-sharks/2008/11/28/1227491828094.html</a></p>
<p>ps can anyone explain that picture&#8217;s significance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Richards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/11/28/morgan-face-to-face-polls-vs-other-phone-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-11391</link>
		<dc:creator>David Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=2883#comment-11391</guid>
		<description>hey poss - loved that clip of spy vs spy - Don&#039;t Tear It Down... the two houses opposite me were pulled down, despite being in good condition.  The latest one has had three claustrophobic chicken coops built in its place, the other had two similarly small little boxes built (little boxes little boxes all built of ticky tacky and they all look quite the same).  Now, if the new broom cupboard-sized  erections were sold/rented pro rata (0.5 or 0.33 of the previous rent/price of the pre-existing structure), then you could argue that it was necessary to solve the housing crisis.  However, as these new edifices are often a higher rent/price than the preceding dwelling, the only justification is GREED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey poss &#8211; loved that clip of spy vs spy &#8211; Don&#8217;t Tear It Down&#8230; the two houses opposite me were pulled down, despite being in good condition.  The latest one has had three claustrophobic chicken coops built in its place, the other had two similarly small little boxes built (little boxes little boxes all built of ticky tacky and they all look quite the same).  Now, if the new broom cupboard-sized  erections were sold/rented pro rata (0.5 or 0.33 of the previous rent/price of the pre-existing structure), then you could argue that it was necessary to solve the housing crisis.  However, as these new edifices are often a higher rent/price than the preceding dwelling, the only justification is GREED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
