Politics, elections and piffle plinking

Ouchpoll

Ouch.

This is our high and low sensitivity locally weighted polynomial regression fits for the Primary vote estimates of every poll taken this year.

With Newspoll and Essential Research coming in at 59/41 this week on the two party preferred (the ALP up 1 in a week with Essential and up 4 in a fortnight with Newspoll), the public seems to have given Malcolm Turnbull the finger for Christmas.

The primary vote change has been similarly hostile for Truffles with the ALP coming in at 50 with Essential (up 2 in a week) and 48 with Newspoll (up 6 in a fortnight), while the Coalition are 34 with Essential (down 1 in a week) and 35 with Newspoll (down 3 in a fortnight).

That flows in to our Pollytrack series a little bit like this:

It’s not a particularly pretty picture for the Coalition, but highlights how this wasn’t some huge move that occurred over the last 2 weeks alone, but where Labor has been grinding away at the Coalition vote since the week after Turnbull gained the leadership.

The Newspoll satisfaction ratings show a similar picture.

The low point for Rudd was Turnbull’s ascension, but now his satisfaction rating is back as it was in April.

Turnbull on the other hand is still holding up quite well.

But the key measure here is the net satisfaction dynamics with both undecided voters included and removed.

While it might look like the Turnbull leadership hasn’t been as crash hot as the headline satisfaction ratings suggest, it’s worth having a squiz at how the net satisfaction ratings for Rudd play out against the two party preferred margin for the ALP to get a bit of a grip on the dynamics at play.

Rudd’s net satisfaction started lifting dramatically in October, but there was a bit of a lag when it came to the vote estimates flowing through mirroring that satisfaction boost (which they nearly always, eventually do)– we can probably put that lag down to Turnbull. It might look bad for Truffles, but he does seem to be minimising the vote damage from a resurgent Rudd and being reasonably successful at delaying it’s full effect.

Finally, this is what the two party preferred Pollytrack swing looks like this week. The black line is the TPP vote swing from the last election and is read from the right hand axis, the bars are the number of seats such a uniform swing would deliver to the ALP and is read from the left hand axis. This is all based on the Pollytrack data.

As always, The Polls page has all of the raw vote estimate polling data and various current aggregation measures, the Pollytrack page has all the usual Pollytrack charts and the Polling Charts page has everything from vote estimates to satisfaction ratings charts for the pollsters. They’ve all been updated this morning.

Elsewhere: Pollbludger and LP and Blogocrats.

4 Comments

  1. 1
    David Richards
    Posted December 9, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    It just gets better and better. Although, given a third party in a viable position challenging Rudd validly on his failings (and there are a few), things might be interesting. The only real surprise is that the Libs are still over the 30% primary… they really deserve to be in sub 20% zone.

  2. 2
    Labor Outsider
    Posted December 9, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Hi Possum

    You may have commented on this before, but do you think it is in the Liberal party’s interests to maintain the coalition while in opposition?

  3. 3
    Posted December 10, 2008 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    I don’t LO, but I think it’s absolutely in the interest of the National Party to break from the Coalition permanently. The Libs take more seats off the Nats than the ALP do (especially in the coastal areas and places with decent population growth), and the Independents take seats of the Nats in the inland seats (including Lyne which behaves like one even though it’s on the coast) because the locals reckon the Nats are too close to the Libs and don’t stick up for their interests.

    The only sustainable future for the National Party is as a country party.

    If the Liberals didnt have to worry about the rural constituency as much, they might be able to make a better fist of dealing with their twin support bases that are usually in a permanent state of ideological conflict within the party (the inner metro Libs and the rural/regional conservatives)

  4. 4
    Labor Outsider
    Posted December 10, 2008 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    I agree with that – which is why I found Turnbull’s hinted support for a federal merger of the two parties bizarre. Perhaps they are concerned that if there is a formal break, then their chances of blocking bills in the Senate will be curtailed?

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.