<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chart of the Day &#8211; The ALP Political Prism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/</link>
	<description>Politics, elections and piffle plinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:53:36 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Possum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11562</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11562</guid>
		<description>Catatonia, most of the data you&#039;re after is available over at the Dept of Human Services:
http://www.humanservices.gov.au/dhs/publications/electorate-data/az.html

George Megalogenis thinks the issues surrounding single parent payments had a good bit to do with those swings - he&#039;s probably right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catatonia, most of the data you&#8217;re after is available over at the Dept of Human Services:<br />
<a href="http://www.humanservices.gov.au/dhs/publications/electorate-data/az.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanservices.gov.au/dhs/publications/electorate-data/az.html</a></p>
<p>George Megalogenis thinks the issues surrounding single parent payments had a good bit to do with those swings &#8211; he&#8217;s probably right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catatonia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11558</link>
		<dc:creator>Catatonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11558</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t feel silly. It&#039;s something that can happen to the best of us :)

By the way, are the data you used publicly available? I&#039;d love to conjure up a similar graph, using other Centrelink payments such as Newstart (the dole), Parenting Payment (single mothers) and the Disability Support Pension. Recipients of the last two benefits were shafted by the Howard government in its last term - in the 2005 budget (IIRC), Howard and Costello tightened eligibility for both payments, by forcing single mothers to start looking for work when their youngest child turned 6 years of age (instead of 16) and restricting the DSP to those who are unable to work 15 hours a week (instead of 30).

I&#039;m wondering if this is one reason why seats with an above-average proportion of solo parents such as Macarthur, Forde, etc. saw 10%+ swings to Labor last year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feel silly. It&#8217;s something that can happen to the best of us <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way, are the data you used publicly available? I&#8217;d love to conjure up a similar graph, using other Centrelink payments such as Newstart (the dole), Parenting Payment (single mothers) and the Disability Support Pension. Recipients of the last two benefits were shafted by the Howard government in its last term &#8211; in the 2005 budget (IIRC), Howard and Costello tightened eligibility for both payments, by forcing single mothers to start looking for work when their youngest child turned 6 years of age (instead of 16) and restricting the DSP to those who are unable to work 15 hours a week (instead of 30).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if this is one reason why seats with an above-average proportion of solo parents such as Macarthur, Forde, etc. saw 10%+ swings to Labor last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11554</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11554</guid>
		<description>Catatonia.

Ooops! Thanks for that (shuffles away feeling a bit silly)

All fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catatonia.</p>
<p>Ooops! Thanks for that (shuffles away feeling a bit silly)</p>
<p>All fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catatonia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11552</link>
		<dc:creator>Catatonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11552</guid>
		<description>Hi Possum, just something I noticed on the second graph. Pardon me if I&#039;m mistaken, but it looks like you have the two axes vicky-verker. In the first graph, the three seats with the highest %age of FTB A recipients are Holt, Chifley and La Trobe. But on the second graph, these three seats are shown has having the highest number of Age Pension recipients, while the retiree havens of Gilmore, Lyne and Hinkler are shown as having the most FTB A beneficiaries.

Apart from that, excellent graphs. The split between the inner cities (including safe ALP and safe LIB seats) and the rest of the country is what I find the most striking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Possum, just something I noticed on the second graph. Pardon me if I&#8217;m mistaken, but it looks like you have the two axes vicky-verker. In the first graph, the three seats with the highest %age of FTB A recipients are Holt, Chifley and La Trobe. But on the second graph, these three seats are shown has having the highest number of Age Pension recipients, while the retiree havens of Gilmore, Lyne and Hinkler are shown as having the most FTB A beneficiaries.</p>
<p>Apart from that, excellent graphs. The split between the inner cities (including safe ALP and safe LIB seats) and the rest of the country is what I find the most striking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11551</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11551</guid>
		<description>Steve and Fredex, over the Christmas period we&#039;ll break these charts down a bit further and do it by party, so the charts will become much more user friendly. Those two new Morgan polls are a bit fluffy, we&#039;ll have a look at them later on the weekend sometime.

LO, it&#039;s the way the government is using FTB A that seems to be the big thing here. George Meg has a good article that&#039;s been linked into in the post that goes through most of it., but there&#039;s a bit more as well which we&#039;ll get into when we break those charts down further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve and Fredex, over the Christmas period we&#8217;ll break these charts down a bit further and do it by party, so the charts will become much more user friendly. Those two new Morgan polls are a bit fluffy, we&#8217;ll have a look at them later on the weekend sometime.</p>
<p>LO, it&#8217;s the way the government is using FTB A that seems to be the big thing here. George Meg has a good article that&#8217;s been linked into in the post that goes through most of it., but there&#8217;s a bit more as well which we&#8217;ll get into when we break those charts down further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>fredn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>I think it is summed up in two words &quot;working families&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is summed up in two words &#8220;working families&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11548</link>
		<dc:creator>fredex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11548</guid>
		<description>Possum Ive justy been looking at Morgan&#039;s leadership survey and I&#039;m finding it a bit .....&#039;confusing&#039; will do.

http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4347/

With 561 sample is it statistically credible to say how many Greens prefer person A to B for example, ditto for FF and others?
Do I understand that they asked people to imagine they were an ALP voter and poll for second string ALP leader, and then asked the same people to imagine they were a Coalition voter and poll for second string Coal leader?
Wear different hats?

Care to comment on the survey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possum Ive justy been looking at Morgan&#8217;s leadership survey and I&#8217;m finding it a bit &#8230;..&#8217;confusing&#8217; will do.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4347/" rel="nofollow">http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4347/</a></p>
<p>With 561 sample is it statistically credible to say how many Greens prefer person A to B for example, ditto for FF and others?<br />
Do I understand that they asked people to imagine they were an ALP voter and poll for second string ALP leader, and then asked the same people to imagine they were a Coalition voter and poll for second string Coal leader?<br />
Wear different hats?</p>
<p>Care to comment on the survey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labor Outsider</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11547</link>
		<dc:creator>Labor Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11547</guid>
		<description>Hi Possum - I love the graphs, but can you explain in more detail how there is anything new in this information, other than presentational? Its hardly a shock that a government will direct its largesse to those parts of the electorate that maximise its chances of winning the next election. And coalition electorates have long been split along socio-economic lines. In government, the coalition has often been sustained by shared goals on social policy....and the coalition leadership buying off support in the bush with all sorts of rural largesse....In opposition, where it is harder to set the agenda, and you have no opportunity to dole out money, that coalition is harder to sustain....This government may end up being more successful than most in identifying ways to wedge the coalition, but it is hardly a new political strategy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Possum &#8211; I love the graphs, but can you explain in more detail how there is anything new in this information, other than presentational? Its hardly a shock that a government will direct its largesse to those parts of the electorate that maximise its chances of winning the next election. And coalition electorates have long been split along socio-economic lines. In government, the coalition has often been sustained by shared goals on social policy&#8230;.and the coalition leadership buying off support in the bush with all sorts of rural largesse&#8230;.In opposition, where it is harder to set the agenda, and you have no opportunity to dole out money, that coalition is harder to sustain&#8230;.This government may end up being more successful than most in identifying ways to wedge the coalition, but it is hardly a new political strategy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11546</link>
		<dc:creator>fredex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11546</guid>
		<description>I second Steve&#039;s request.
Obviously  I don&#039;t know who holds where as well as some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Steve&#8217;s request.<br />
Obviously  I don&#8217;t know who holds where as well as some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2008/12/19/chart-of-the-day-the-alp-political-prism/comment-page-1/#comment-11545</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=3086#comment-11545</guid>
		<description>Hi Possum, any chance you could colour the points on the chart by party holding that seat? Might make the clustering a little more obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Possum, any chance you could colour the points on the chart by party holding that seat? Might make the clustering a little more obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
