With Qld being the next stop for the electoral campaign circus, that fanciful beast The Liberal National Party is off to the same start we’ve all seen so many times before north of the Rio Tweed – which just goes to show that regardless of the money pissed up the wall on trying to rebrand a political outfit, politics is essentially a scratch’n’sniff process as far as the electorate is concerned. To quote one of the greatest philosophers of the late 20th Century, “It’s all the same – only the names will cha -aa -aa -ange”.
In previous elections, the LNP script operating under the working title of “The Coalition – Our Reality is Your Punchline” went something like this:
In the lead up to the election, the Coalition locked themselves in a cupboard for 6 months and outsourced their job to the Curious Snail. As a result of the QLD population not being exposed to their usually unphotogenic mugshots appearing on the TV every night, saying the type of silly things that Oppositions tend to say, their polling improved dramatically.
Queenslanders started pondering whether, in theory at least, they would hypothetically vote for the Powerful Lack of Alternatives – not as some actual political party mind you, but more as a hazy, nebulous concept.
As the Courier Mail’s election speculation went into overdrive – the Curious Snail being the inadvertent Chief Political Advisor to The Coalition – and started asking the question “Where’s Lawrence?”, Springborg felt compelled to start saying things.
“All good and well” I hear you say, “That’s what Oppositions do” – which is a fine point to make let me just say.
However, the things that lept out of The Borg’s mouth werent particularly sensible things – more akin to throwing grenades than sharp one liners, but where the grenades ended up ricocheting off the nearest objects (often Curious Snail journo’s and random Liberal Party candidates) and ended up landing in that rather large chasm that separated the Liberal and National parties, before detonating and blowing up whatever rickety bridge was happening to span it at the time.
The more Springborg spoke about the things he believed in and the things he would do – the more urban Liberal voters became horrified at the prospect of having to live under a political regime whose views belonged in a museum.
So Labor ended up waltzing home in election after election, picking up urban seats like Clayfield and Indooroopilly along the way – seats that the ALP should never have won in a pink fit.
It wasn’t any one particular thing that Springborg said which caused Liberal voters to send their votes, however grudgingly, to somewhere other than Liberal candidates – Springborg simply managed to alienate Liberal voters a few percent at a time, one sentence at a time, one stunt at a time.
Landclearing, social policy, dams, education, health – you name it and there was a Springborg line that appealed to his base – the voters he didn’t need – and which alienated the urban conservatives and Liberals, the voters every government needs.
After being kicked around by the QLD population, the Labor Party, the Courier Mail, local television and radio, the business community and the net for the last few elections, one would think that Springborg would have learned that most valuable of psephological lessons – you cannot form government without winning votes in the places where it matters, which in QLD terms can be summed up in one word: “Brisbane”.
So what does The Borg do? He pulls out the old election script, dusts it off, substitutes LNP for “The Coalition” and starts repeating the same mistakes he made last time, and the time before , and which his party made the time before that.
Which get’s us to the title “How to Lose an Election in 27 Easy Steps”. 27 is just an arbitrary number – in reality there will probably be hundreds of little steps that will happen. We’ve already seen the first few steps repeated – the hiding out in a cupboard, the outsourcing of the role of Opposition to the Curious Snail, the media asking “Where’s Lawrence” and him responding by saying things, not particularly sensible things – in fact, things that are more akin to throwing grenades than sharp one liners, but where the grenades end up ricocheting off the nearest objects (usually Curious Snail journo’s) and end up landing in that rather large chasm that separates the Liberal and National party constituencies, before detonating and blowing up whatever rickety bridge is happening to span that chasm at the time.
Barnyard was playing to his constituents a few days ago by comparing environmentalists and greenies to Nazis.No harm done, that’s Barnyards base. But Springborg couldnt help himself, completely forgetting about the inner urban Liberal voters that:
(a) he needs, for without them he can’t win an election.
(b) don’t believe that environmentalism is a dirty word and are actually quite fond of things Green, and
(c) are willing to pay for the costs of any Emissions Trading Scheme because they’re quite affluent and believe that it is a Good Thing….
….Springborg quickly resorted to type by pandering to his base which he doesn’t need (since they all vote for him anyway), but in the process reinforced a big negative to a few percent of the population that he cannot afford to alienate. He let it be known that despite the name change from The Coalition to the LNP, Springborg and his National Party are just the same as they were last time, and the time before that, and the time before that – in fact, the leader of the LNP is just the same as the Nats have always been since the 1950’s.
This quip might only have annoyed a few percent – but that’s what Springborg does, political suicide by a few percent at a time.
He’s Australia’s foremost expert at it.
Elsewhere: LP


10 Comments
Heh.
Great post, Possum!
The Nats just don’t get it, soon they will be like the rump that makes up the Nats in the Feds. That motor bike stunt of Springers was plain silly, in a time when the economy is slip sliding around we have a leader promising a trail bike track to no-where so we don’t have to put up with hoons. Typical Nats stuff, law and order, lock ‘em up and throw away the key. yeah that will get us voted in, just like the old days. The Nats love the old days, the good old days
and Springers leads them back there everytime.
Great post!
LO, you’ve got to see it up close to believe it!
It really is astonishing.
I just love the indepth work the Liberal National Party have done on policies. Springborg has been in Parliament for something like nineteen or twenty years now and this is his fresh, new, nineteen year old Health Policy of the Liberal National Party.
http://www.springborg.com/policy/lawrence-policy/a-world-class-health-system.html
Inspiring in both the breath and depth of detail.
As a contrast, the Greens focus on Reproductive health,
http://qld.greens.org.au/policies/Qld-policies/reproductive-health
and Labor weigh in with its policy work one would expect from a party in Government.
http://www.towardq2.qld.gov.au/library/pdf/tomorrow/Towards_Q2_Tomorrows_Queensland.pdf
While I agree with your analysis of the tension between the two types of potential LNP voters, rural conservatives and urban liberals, I’m astounded that anyone could say after the history of the last fifteen years that the rural voters are “his [Springborg's] base which he doesn’t need (since they all vote for him anyway)”
What about Pauline Hanson and One Nation? What about Bob Katter? What about Tony Windsor, Robert Oakeshott and Peter Andren? All these people (and one party) have taken “natural” National/LNP seats away from the Nationals/LNP because the voters in those areas see the modern National Party/LNP as nothing better than “Liberals wearing Akubras”.
Even if Springborg were the most competent political strategist who ever lived, good strategy can’t do much to bring together two irreconcilable types of voter. Do you seriously think that if Springborg could win Government just by appealing to urban liberals and taking rural conservatives for granted, he wouldn’t be doing that right now?
There’s currently no One Nation in Qld – that threat came and went, so the rural vote is once again the Nats base and as long as Springborg doesn’t say anything to grossly alienate them they’ll vote for the Nats as they usually do.
But he doesn’t need to pander to them to get their vote.
Everytime he does, he clips votes off urban Liberals. I don’t think he’s got a chance of winning regardless, unless some dramatic event happens between now and Election day – but he risks gaining zero ground by pandering to his base when he doesn’t need to.
Just because the political party One Nation self-destructed, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t potential political support for a rural populist movement that is hostile to the “official” rural party. One Nation didn’t exist in early 1996 and then in 1998 won a quarter of the vote in Queensland. It’s important not to confuse the political incompetence of the One Nation MPs and party officials with the waning of support for a conservative-populist pro-rural agenda.
Bob Katter still holds down a Federal seat in Queensland, in what should be solid-gold LNP country – no doubt he attracts a lot of voters who normally vote National/LNP and who would be open to voting for One Nation if its leadership hadn’t proved useless.
If the LNP want to avoid another populist uprising on their right flank they DO have to actively attract the votes of populist rural conservatives. If those conservatives feel that the LNP is not representing their interests *they will join or start another party or independent movement*. They WON’T just vote for the Nats automatically, as the examples I gave in my previous comment indicate.
This means that Springborg’s problem is not (necessarily) one of mere political incompetence which could be fixed by an adjustment in strategy. He is boxed in structurally and has *no possible* winning strategy.