<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essential Report &#8211; Turnbull&#8217;s Inroads Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/</link>
	<description>Politics, elections and piffle plinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:29:12 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lord D</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=4896#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>The questions in the table are from this week&#039;s sample.  Given the 4-pt drop in Labor&#039;s vote over a 2-wk rolling sample, this week&#039;s was probably a 52-48.  Hence, comparison with the last time that question was asked will tend to favour the Libs by more than one would expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The questions in the table are from this week&#8217;s sample.  Given the 4-pt drop in Labor&#8217;s vote over a 2-wk rolling sample, this week&#8217;s was probably a 52-48.  Hence, comparison with the last time that question was asked will tend to favour the Libs by more than one would expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13318</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=4896#comment-13318</guid>
		<description>The thing about that first table, &#039;who does a better job?&#039; is that it shows Labor has dropped 10 points on every issue mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about that first table, &#8216;who does a better job?&#8217; is that it shows Labor has dropped 10 points on every issue mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13317</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=4896#comment-13317</guid>
		<description>True TWM, and Labors ad din&#039;t do them any favours. All it did was confirm their weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True TWM, and Labors ad din&#8217;t do them any favours. All it did was confirm their weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewetmale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13316</link>
		<dc:creator>thewetmale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=4896#comment-13316</guid>
		<description>I think the thing that scares me more than the silliness of the debate over the last week (from a public debate perspective, from the perspective of a political junkie it was hilarious) is the prospect of 18 months straight of &#039;debt and deficit&#039; coming from the coalition; no more no less. FFS both parties have put out TV ads. As if they don&#039;t give us the shits in a 4-6 week campaign enough, we could get it for 74-76 weeks (a rough calculation of 18 months.) I mean, all the best to Turnbull; he&#039;s got to do what he&#039;s got to do, but it&#039;s going to get painful if we don&#039;t get a DD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thing that scares me more than the silliness of the debate over the last week (from a public debate perspective, from the perspective of a political junkie it was hilarious) is the prospect of 18 months straight of &#8216;debt and deficit&#8217; coming from the coalition; no more no less. FFS both parties have put out TV ads. As if they don&#8217;t give us the shits in a 4-6 week campaign enough, we could get it for 74-76 weeks (a rough calculation of 18 months.) I mean, all the best to Turnbull; he&#8217;s got to do what he&#8217;s got to do, but it&#8217;s going to get painful if we don&#8217;t get a DD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2009/06/01/essential-report-turnbulls-inroads-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-13315</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/?p=4896#comment-13315</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be honest, if Labor received a primary vote of 45% at the next election it would be a wipeout. Not even I believe that will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest, if Labor received a primary vote of 45% at the next election it would be a wipeout. Not even I believe that will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
