Politics, elections and piffle plinking

Spillwatch – Spill Day

Like yesterday – particularly for you folks at work that can’t access the more interesting parts of the net – we’ll aggregate the best bits from around the place to follow The Spill in detail without the fluff. It won’t be flashy, just easy to follow – the time stamps will be in AEDT.

6:55

Via Latika Bourke (2UE)

Joe Hockey finally speaks. (well his office.) He contesteth, but will not vote againt Malcolm. No blood on his hands. #spill

Via Stephen Spencer (Ten)

It’s official: Joe is running. His office says he’ll vote against the spill, but if that succeeds he’ll run, offering a free vote on the ETS

—-

7:32 Via Stephen Spencer

Hockey’s office confirms it’s a ticket with Dutton.

It’s a Hockey/Dutton ticket. It’s pretty light on economics.

—-

7:51 Via James Massola (Canberra Times)

Reps doors so far:farmer 4 Abbott,Lindsay 4 turnbull,bilkson 4 hockey, jensen 4 Abbott #spill

—-

7:53 Via Latika Bourke

Minchin says claims any candidate would be his puppet are ‘incredible.’

—-

7:56 Via Samantha Maiden (The Oz)

Latest at The Oz. “A three way debacle” one MP texted this morning. Hockey the fave but could be in trouble. http://tiny.cc/RDPYn

That article in The Oz is worth a read.

—-

8:00am Bernard Keane on ABC News Radio reckons Kevin Andrews may also throw his hat in the ring

—-

8:10am

Turnbull says he won’t speculate on what he might do if he loses on ABC Radio’s AM program – calls rumours of him starting his own party “in the realm of science fiction”. Says his candidacy is the one with integrity of purpose.

—-

8:15 David Speers says Andrews isnt running.

—-

8:23 Via James Massola

Reps doors trending to abbott, just #spill

—-

8:25 Kieran Gilbert on Sky says that there’s about 12 votes in it and Hockey as the numbers.

—-

8:28 Samantha Maiden says:

Liberal senator Judith Troeth says she and 8 other senators will vote for Labor’s ETS – Rudd and Wong only need seven votes #spill

—-

8:46 Still the quiet before the storm. Annabel Crabb says :

Parliament full of Labor MPs with big grins #spill

—-

8:53 The  press gallery is being herded into away from the MPs. A lot on not very happy scribes.

—-

8:56 In one of the weirdest things ever broadcast, ABC Breakfast interviewed Joe Hockey’s cousin who said that Joe wasnt ready for the leadership!

Good Grief – relatives, you can’t choose ‘em

—-

8:59 The Party room is filling up – Turnbull and Hockey have entered.

—-

9:03 This meeting could go for a very long time BTW.

—-

9:16 Via Annabel Crabb

Libs are being frisked at the door for mobiles. Nasty blow for text traffic. #spill

Chances of leaks have reduced dramatically

—-

9:31 While we’re waiting, some early thoughts on electoral consequences.

If Abbott wins, seats like North Sydney, Wentworth, Ryan, Sturt, La Trobe and Dickson are probably gone – with those leafy Victorian safe seats like Higgins, Kooyong, Goldstein having their margins seriously cut. But seats like Cowper, Hinkler and Fairfax probably become safely kept by the Coalition.

If Hockey wins, the inner metro’s of Ryan, North Sydney, Wentworth and Sturt are probably kept (maybe even Dickson), but seats like Cowper, Hinkler, Fairfax, La Trobe, Fisher, Wright and maybe even Canning are most likely gone.

—-

9:40 40 minutes have passed now, I guess the spill motion passed and we’re on to a vote. Although there was talk about speeches being allowed, which could have dragged the thing out.

—-

9:43 The spill motion has apparently passed (how anyone knows since everyone was frisked going in is a bit of a mystery), so the result should be in 15-20 minutes

—–

9:49 Here we go – Alex Somlylay emerges, walks dont the corridor, puts on his best face and announces that Tony Abbott has won by 1 vote!

—-

9:52 Spill motion passed 48/34. Hockey was eliminated in first round with Turnbull getting 26 votes, Abbott 35 votes and Hockey 23.

The Abbott/Turnbull head to head went 42/41

—-

9:59 The numbers don’t add up. The spill went 48/34 which was 82 people

The first round had Turnbull=26, Abbott=35, Hockey=23 which is 84 people

Final round was Abbott=41, Turnbull=41 which is 83 people voting.

Who was the missing person!?!

10:05 Turnbull’s office (via James Massola) says there was an informal vote in the final round and Fran Bailey abstained (she was granted special leave from the meeting today). Still doesnt explain anything

33 Comments

  1. 1
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 6:03 am | Permalink

    ...] Politics, elections and piffle plinking Skip to content « The Monster Nielsen Poll Spillwatch – Spill Day » [...

  2. 2
    Nate The Great
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    Thanks Poss (and Marsupial News Network)

  3. 3
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 6:53 am | Permalink

    Thanks Poss – blood sport should always be watched live and for someone living in the far north, this is as live as it gets

  4. 4
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 7:17 am | Permalink

    Andrews has said that he won’t run.

  5. 5
    autocrat
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    What’s this “ticket” thing – don’t the Liberabbles elect them separately?

  6. 6
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:13 am | Permalink

    Autocrat, often leadership contests have pairs running together because each can bring votes for the other that they ordinarily couldnt get.

  7. 7
    cud chewer
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    Possum, do you think the Liberal MPs are informed of how badly an anti ETS would do for them in their own seats?

  8. 8
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    I know that they haven’t been informed properly Cud because some asked me about it – which was interesting. Normally it’s ALP backbenchers that do that sort of thing.

  9. 9
    cud chewer
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    yikes..

  10. 10
    bob1234
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    sunrise sunriseon7

    Mark Riley tells Kochie the #spill motion has got up. Result expected in 15mins. half a minute ago from TweetDeck

  11. 11
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    Maybe they’re still reading out the minutes from the last meeting??

  12. 12
    Cat
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Poss do you really think Hockey would lose his seat in an Abbott lead coalition contesting the next election? What was the swing in 07?

  13. 13
    Cat
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    Suddenly that question is more relevant?

  14. 14
    podrick
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    ABBOTT!!!!!!!!

  15. 15
    cud chewer
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    we live in interesting times :(

  16. 16
    Cat
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    The Libs have had a religious experience ending with an Abbott and a Bishop in charge!

  17. 17
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    It’s Abbott! Tht’s is truly bizare

  18. 18
    David Richards
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    it just gets better and better

    Abbott leading a divided party – the Libs are facing oblivion!

  19. 19
    Maria Conidaris
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    who abstained?

  20. 20
    DrMick
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    Maybe Joe voted for himself again and it wasn’t counted.

  21. 21
    Johnny Come Lately
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    the vultures are circling

  22. 22
    caf
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Joe dodged a bullet today.

  23. 23
    DrMick
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    Wait a minute – Hockey got 23 votes. That means 7 people who voted for Joe first time went for Abbott second time round?? I think the Libs should find out who these people are and check they are not secret ALP members.

  24. 24
    quantize
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    The day the Liberal Party died…

  25. 25
    David Richards
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    Wilson Tuckey calling Hockey the village idiot is a howler!

  26. 26
    David Richards
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Will the ALP now ditch the amended ETS and negotiate with the Greens for a real ETS that will work?

  27. 27
    cud chewer
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Will there be one or two Lib Senators that would go along with a Greens friendly ETS?

  28. 28
    bob1234
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    Seconds after Mr Abbott beat Malcolm Turnbull by one vote, he then declared a secret ballot on the ETS.

    The motion proposed that the legislation should be delayed for three months, and if this could not be secured, then the legislation should be defeated.

    The motion was carried by 54 votes to 29, guaranteeing the death of the Rudd Government’s ETS.

    http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote–ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html

    But will 7 Lib Senators cross the floor…

  29. 29
    caf
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    David Richards: No, for several practical reasons.

    1. There is no point. Even with all the ALP and Green votes in the Senate, they still need two more votes, which just aren’t there.

    2. Even if the ALP and Greens managed to get a “greener” ETS through, it would be a pyhrric victory for the ALP. The main battle which the ALP is focussed on is with the Liberals, and an ETS passed without any Liberal “ownership” is an ETS which the Liberals can use to beat the ALP up with for any negative effects or implementation difficulties, for years to come. And there will be teething problems.

    3. It would also be a pyhrric victory for the Greens. Their differentiation is being “greener than thou”, and if the ALP manages to pass a halfway effective ETS, even with Greens support, that means the Greens lose brand differentiation. They’ll bleed votes back to the ALP, when some voters decide “oh hey, the ALP aren’t so bad on the environment after all”. Thus the realpolitik dictates that The Greens can never compromise on this issue – they must always be able to stand up and say “If you’d voted for us, you’d have a REALLY effective scheme, instead of this mickey-mouse one”.

  30. 30
    David Richards
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    caf – yes, that is the way things will play out, given the idiocy of party politics.
    It shows that both majors don’t really give a monkey’s about climate change. If the ALP were serious, they would leave the political gameplay aside and do a deal with the Greens. So too the Greens, if they were serious, they’d do a deal with the ALP.

    The silly gameplay is why we always get crap public policy.

  31. 31
    bob1234
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    So too the Greens, if they were serious, they’d do a deal with the ALP.

    Labor refuses to deal with the Greens as they’d rather put the coalition through agony.

    Politics before good policy. Par for the course.

  32. 32
    David Richards
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    A new bizarre result just occured to me – Minchin could have done a Gorton and run and won as leader, then jumped into a convenient Reps seat… if one could be found in SA.

  33. 33
    DPDP
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Thanks again for this, Possum – and for the time stamps! :)

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.