Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Andrew Bolt

Feb 28, 2009

"Spivs and chancers"

In his Friday column, Andrew Bolt launches a best-of-the-rightwing-web attack on the new US Preside

User login status :

Share

In his Friday column, Andrew Bolt launches a best-of-the-rightwing-web attack on the new US President for “surrounding himself with spivs and chancers”:

GOOD thing for Barack Obama that he isn’t George Bush. He’d have been slaughtered for starting so badly that he’s picking a Cabinet of tax cheats.

Only problem is, he isn’t.

In the cabinet of fifteen people (or 22 if you include cabinet-level positions like the Vice-President), Bolt points to dodgy conduct of two. (And one of those he can only attack because her husband screwed up his taxes, not her.) Which isn’t going to sound like “surrounding” Obama to anyone.

So Bolt pads it out. He adds five dodgy politicians who were not selected by Obama. And he adds two Democrats whose finances sound a bit dodgy but who aren’t in Obama’s list of picks and he has to blandly describe as “helping Obama run the economy” – if you can tell me the specifics of what he means by that, I’d be most obliged.

In total the Southbank columnist lists nine people, only two of which are in Obama’s cabinet – hardly the new President “picking a Cabinet of tax cheats” or “surrounding himself with spivs and chancers”, which turns out to be a fairly contemptible slur on the twenty people at whom he can’t even find any particular mud to throw.

Still, he’s playing to the gallery – not seriously trying to persuade anyone not long since converted. He turns the misdeeds of three Democrats into this favourite Republican party line:

Hmm. What is it about Big Government Democrats that they so hate paying the taxes they impose on others?

Well, based on what you’ve come up with today, the evidence for that amongst Obama’s cabinet seems a little thin, doesn’t it Andrew? (Although it’s probably a common attitude amongst very rich people. Should rich politicians who personally want to avoid taxes join the Republican Party, where they’re quite open about wanting the rich to pay less tax and cut services for the poor? I’d tend to prefer that whatever their personal flaws, at least their public activities were positive for the underprivileged, but that might just be me.)

Now, to be fair, Andy is not wrong about the US Democrats being corrupt. He’s just extremely partisan to fail to acknowledge that the US Republicans are just as much, if not more so. The US system, with its permanent, unchangeable two major parties and ludicrously lax campaign finance laws, pretty much guarantees that all politicians need to be both personally rich, and completely sold out to campaign donors. It is not a surprise to anyone to find that the new Administration has difficulty finding any cabinet candidates with both experience in Washington AND clean hands. It also seems to be a bit rough to blame Obama for that.

Of course, Bolt isn’t so foolish as to claim that the Republicans were any more pure – he’s simply complaining that whilst their conduct was seen as dirty and was pilloried in the media, there seems to be little outrage against Obama. His weak suggestion (depending on the reader’s believing in “the Left-leaning media” conspiracy) is that it’s because of who he is:

WHO wants to get tough on America’s first black president?

…Obama, on the other hand, has had little such media criticism, and certainly none of that vitriol.

He can bank on more media goodwill for some time yet.

Until the other side doesn’t have to try so hard, to exaggerate and pad and twist so vigorously, to squeeze out an attack that can actually be published, I suspect, Andrew.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Mr Lefty

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

19 comments

19 thoughts on ““Spivs and chancers”

  1. DBD

    God he’s pathetic.

    He is so blinded by ideology he will support corrupt conservatives, because he KNOWS in his heart that they are in the right.

    I wonder where our Conservative hero was when the NSW Libs were accepting nearly $100,000 in bribes from the mafia?

    And where was he when Amanda Vanstone intervened in the deportation proceedings of an Italian illegal immigrant who has since been charged with importing over $400 million worth of ecstasy into Australia.

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/antimafia-police-slam-vanstone-20080927-4pde.html?page=-1

    http://www.smh.com.au/national/libs-link-to-mafia-visa-inquiry-20090222-8er5.html?skin=text-only

    He has been alerted to this story by several readers of his Blog Of Freedom over the last few days, but I guess he was too busy launching attacks on Obama, the PurePoison crew and The Greens to write a post on it.

    The responses of his fans to commenters who have drawn attention to this scandal have been incredible. Mostly attempts to justify Vanstones behaviour, deflections about how Labor are corrupt too (Yes, they are. What’s your point?), or personal attacks on the person who drew attention to it.

    Corruption is obviously only a bad thing when its from a democrat or a “small l” liberal.

  2. Tobias Ziegler

    And he carries on his one-sided look at US politics today. A Democrat’s actions don’t exactly match his pre-election rhetoric – you were lied to!

    And it’s not as if Obama has written something off as a non-core promise – he has extended the period for drawing down combat troops in Iraq by three months from the original plan. After consulting with the military leaders he didn’t have access to during the campaign.