<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread 3 July ‘09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/07/03/open-thread-3-july-%e2%80%9809/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/07/03/open-thread-3-july-%e2%80%9809/</link>
	<description>Just another Crikey Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:13 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: confessions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/07/03/open-thread-3-july-%e2%80%9809/comment-page-1/#comment-9020</link>
		<dc:creator>confessions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/?p=2445#comment-9020</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25724176-25209,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chris mitchell takes a shot at crikey&lt;/a&gt; which he calls a &quot;parasitical publication&quot; that doesn&#039;t break stories, is edited by OMG!!1! a former Age journalist, and unlike the Australian isn&#039;t staffed by professionals committed to &quot;reporting facts.&quot;  I haven&#039;t laughed so hard in ages!  If i remember correctly it was Crikey that broke news of grech as Howard&#039;s go-to man, while news ltd outlets like the Australian were still hand-wringing over being sucked in to beating up a forged email in the hope of nailing Rudd.  Reporting facts, my arse!

I especially love the bit about how crikey &quot;escapes the scrutiny of the Press Council&quot;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/06/30/can-hyperbole-and-hate-mongering-can-be-balanced/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;As if that means anything.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25724176-25209,00.html" rel="nofollow">Chris mitchell takes a shot at crikey</a> which he calls a &#8220;parasitical publication&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t break stories, is edited by OMG!!1! a former Age journalist, and unlike the Australian isn&#8217;t staffed by professionals committed to &#8220;reporting facts.&#8221;  I haven&#8217;t laughed so hard in ages!  If i remember correctly it was Crikey that broke news of grech as Howard&#8217;s go-to man, while news ltd outlets like the Australian were still hand-wringing over being sucked in to beating up a forged email in the hope of nailing Rudd.  Reporting facts, my arse!</p>
<p>I especially love the bit about how crikey &#8220;escapes the scrutiny of the Press Council&#8221;.  <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/06/30/can-hyperbole-and-hate-mongering-can-be-balanced/" rel="nofollow">As if that means anything.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savvas jwnhs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/07/03/open-thread-3-july-%e2%80%9809/comment-page-1/#comment-9016</link>
		<dc:creator>savvas jwnhs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/?p=2445#comment-9016</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Greg Sheridan ranted about the Left and their &#039;silence&#039; over Iran.

He &quot;named names&quot; (see Seinfeld) and one of those named was Antony Loewenstein.

Yet, as Antony pointed out today in a letter printed in The Australian (gee, wasn&#039;t that nice of them), Antony often castigates Iran (and Cuba too).

Just go to his blog, Greg... you could have seen that in a second!!!!

Problem is Sheridan gets a full opinion piece to spout off his dribble, and Antony gets a piddly letter in response.

It reminds me of Al Franken&#039;s piece titled &quot;HANNITY and colmes&quot;... &#039;Fair and balanced&#039;!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Greg Sheridan ranted about the Left and their &#8217;silence&#8217; over Iran.</p>
<p>He &#8220;named names&#8221; (see Seinfeld) and one of those named was Antony Loewenstein.</p>
<p>Yet, as Antony pointed out today in a letter printed in The Australian (gee, wasn&#8217;t that nice of them), Antony often castigates Iran (and Cuba too).</p>
<p>Just go to his blog, Greg&#8230; you could have seen that in a second!!!!</p>
<p>Problem is Sheridan gets a full opinion piece to spout off his dribble, and Antony gets a piddly letter in response.</p>
<p>It reminds me of Al Franken&#8217;s piece titled &#8220;HANNITY and colmes&#8221;&#8230; &#8216;Fair and balanced&#8217;!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
