...] contrast, it seems that only certain World War II analogies are considered worth commenting on by some of our media personalities. Comments (0) | [...

As to your disagreement with the chap above you, I’m surprised you were able to refrain from agreeing with his “Pity Gore is an under-educated man who does not know his history.”

But maybe that was just too well phrased for someone who’d rather go with the ‘fat idiot PWNED’ chant of the anti-science wingnuts.

I know it’s not directed at me, regardless of Nazis being environmentalists and Hitler a non-smoking vegeterian, they were very evil, the evil they committed makes any good points totally and utterly irrelevant, a Nazi utopia wouldn’t be many people’s idea of a utopia.

He’s fat, big deal, many Americans and Australians and other rich westerners are. He’s an idiot? Why, because you disagree with him?

“Gore is a charlatan who abuses good science to further his own ambitions”

That doesn’t make him an idiot, a prick maybe but not an idiot. But, if the abuse of science for whatever ends is such a sin you need to get your arse over to Bolt’s blog, there’s loads of fodder for you there.

“So combing both descriptions is perfectly acceptable in the English language.”

If it were correct.

Gore is fat and Gore is an idiot. So combing both descriptions is perfectly acceptable in the English language.

Gore is a charlatan who abuses good science to further his own ambitions. In other words someone like me can think AGW is a real friggen problem down the track and still think Gore is a fat twerp.

Notwithstanding that, what do you think of Coote’s comments about what nice little environmentalists the Nazis were?

That disrespect an important part of that ‘responsible scientific inquiry’ that ‘disproves’ AGW, eh? (Also, I dig the fact that you disagree with the poster @ 12 who is making similarly cranky anti-Gore arguments as yourself. Solidarity forever, indeed. This is good for real knowledge.)

There was nothing good about the Nazi’s, coote you incredible twit. Even if they loved the forest they were essentially in love with the “Arian” forest and they would have blown up most of that fighting with and killing people. Nothing, not one thing good came out of those murderous lunatics.

Hitler youth went on tree planting days, and they where into very hippyish jungian theory about getting back to nature- the value of a clean natural environment, fresh air, food and lots of exercise for the master race.

So, you’re suggesting the leadership would have made ideal Byron bay residents? Lol.

They also used alternative fuels extensively.

Yea, they sure did seeing their supply routes were cut off. But I guess it was wonderful they had “green” fuels, hey, coote.

A friend from greenpeace told me this years ago and I did not believe him.

Interesting, especially about the Greenpeace critter knowing all this.

This is a parody, right?

Bert, did the degree require good comprehension skills?