Piers Akerman may have pulled it off – he goes from “Wilson Tuckey” to “resilient sanity” in half a sentence.
He also makes this assertion:
The points made in Professor Ian Plimer’s bestselling book Heaven And Earth, as repetitive and scholarly as it may be, has not been demolished.
UPDATE: One of my favourite things about Piers – aside from his tendency toward writing incoherent columns – is that he responds to his commenters with venomous and ill-informed “rebuttals”. Two of my favourites from the current column:
Sceptic – I have yet to see Plimer’s book demolished. I have read personal attacks upon him but nothing to destroy the science his argument is based on. Lift your game.
Braveheart the greenouse argument relies on a CO2 layer in the atmosphere trapping sunlight energy. Why can’t this be found?