Climate change isn’t really my issue, but this pathetically petty post by our friend Andrew Bolt just struck me as so absurd I couldn’t let it pass without comment. A conservative climate-skeptic who regularly contributes to Quadrant attends a Tim Flannery lecture and relates his unsurprisingly negative impressions. Andrew’s emphasis? The part he chooses to quote first? The skeptic’s rebuttal of Flannery’s points? No – his (entirely objective) opinion that “Flannery flops“:
Firstly, without being rude or discourteous, Professor Tim’s lecture would have to have been the worst presented, most head-bangingly-boring and uninformative address that this writer can remember.
Shock news: critical review received by ideological opponent! Hold the presses.
In tomorrow’s edition of the Andrew Bolt blog: the startling revelation that a conservative blogger thinks Kevin Rudd is “a dud”!












152 Comments
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All
Oh and last time I looked the scientists working on AGW had used “scientific method and empirical measurement” so why not believe them?
Not at all Shaun, there are scientists on both sides of this debate and my support for any of their positions is not contingent on their political beliefs.
Straight up that is rubbish!
There are no climatologist on the anti AGW side of the debate.
Geologists and the like don’t count.
Were are in Zombie land. Somebody please kill this thread.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All