Intellectual dishonesty is pure poison – A Crikey weblog

The Australian announces that it wants to “destroy” the Greens

   

Until today, I’d never seen a national broadsheet with pretensions to fair and balanced reporting actually admit that it wasn’t just biased against a party supported by 14% of the country, it wanted to “destroy” it. But that’s just what The Australian did in its editorial today:

Greens leader Bob Brown has accused The Australian of trying to wreck the alliance between the Greens and Labor. We wear Senator Brown’s criticism with pride. We believe he and his Green colleagues are hypocrites; that they are bad for the nation; and that they should be destroyed at the ballot box. The Greens voted against Mr Rudd’s emissions trading scheme because they wanted a tougher regime, then used the lack of action on climate change to damage Labor at the election. Their flakey economics should have no place in the national debate.

Well, there you are. You can take pretty much everything The Australian says about the Greens in that context: they are not interested in giving them a fair hearing, or listening to what they have to say, or presenting their arguments for public assessment: they want them “destroyed”.

Everything you read about The Greens in that paper can now be almost completely discounted by that fact. You can only conclude that if there’s a smear, they’ll run it. If there’s a positive story, they won’t. If there’s a way of presenting the Greens’ policies in the most damaging, least accurate light, that’s how they’ll be presented. The Greens will not be given fair opportunity to respond to critics’ claims about them (including the asinine ones made in that editorial). It will be relentless, one-sided, hostile propaganda.

Anyone who seeks to rely on The Australian for information should be aware that whatever they’re told about the Greens will be subject to the most extraordinary, deliberate bias, with the express purpose of having them “destroyed at the ballot box”.

I know it’s hardly news that Hardly News has an axe to grind against the left in general and the Greens in particular: but this admission, this defiant declaration today is extraordinary. They genuinely think the right so victorious that they can without commercial consequence announce their utter contempt for anyone who believes otherwise. Screw you, progressives who believe in public services, civil liberties, a social democratic Australia. You’re the fringe, and the country’s biggest media empire is working to make sure you are no longer represented in parliament.

This is The Australian openly eschewing reporting for advocacy; nearing the completion of its transition into the Fox News of Australian media.

UPDATE: Maybe the Australian‘s editors are right: maybe their readers won’t in any way be concerned about being openly led around by the nose. After all, many of them voted Liberal even after Tony told them that you couldn’t believe what he said – something they bizarrely cheered as being “refreshing honesty”. Maybe they will, without irony, applaud the Australian promising to dedicate its reporting about the Greens to telling them what they already – because they believe what the Australian tells them about the Greens – believe about the Greens.

(Via reader Wayne.)

111 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

  1. 101
    Posted May 23, 2011 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    ...] But – if you were confused because we declined to be explicit about it when we were claiming to provide you with information rather than propaganda – here are our views, for the record. We believe in low taxes for the rich (at the expense of most of you in “greater suburbia”), and middle class welfare, and locking people up without trial if it can be portrayed as “strong national security”, and pretending that we believe in “the rule of law” when we actually mean “the mob we take pains to misinform“. And of course, we believe the Greens need to be “destroyed”. [...

  2. 102
    Posted June 3, 2011 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    ...] noticed that Greens voters tend to ignore what it says about the party it admits it wants “destroyed“, and so it’s trying a new tactic: trying to separate them by feigning sympathy for [...

  3. 103
    Posted July 17, 2011 at 5:06 am | Permalink

    ...] flagship down-under. Jeremy Sears at Crikey, quoting their editorial argued last year that it wants to destroy the Greens (and hence the minority government) : You can take pretty much everything The Australian says about [...

  4. 104
    Posted July 19, 2011 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    ...] charters. And as for the “kid glove treatment”, does that usually include calls for “destruction at the ballot box” like we saw from The [...

  5. 105
    Posted July 28, 2011 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    ...] of News Limited seems self-serving in the current political climate. The Australian has explicitly declared war on the Greens, and News columnists’ antagonism towards the Gillard carbon tax has been [...

  6. 106
    Posted August 7, 2011 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    ...] in the current political climate. the Australian has explicitly declared war on the Greens, and News columnists’ antagonism towards [...

  7. 107
    Posted October 6, 2011 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    ...] themselves that come on, seriously, those stupid Greens voters who keep voting Greens despite everything News Ltd says about the party must have learned their lesson by now, seriously, come on, [...

  8. 108
    Posted March 27, 2012 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    ...] seats, but what kind of coverage did they get in the only newspaper in the state, the News “the Greens should be destroyed” Ltd Courier Mail? Did they break through at all? Or is the only thing the people of [...

  9. 109
    Posted April 4, 2012 at 8:13 am | Permalink

    ...] anything revealing in the News “the Greens should be destroyed” Ltd “Punch” smears on Bob Brown’s Hobart [...

  10. 110
    Posted April 16, 2012 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    ...] Greens get an easy run in the national media because “scrutiny” means declaring that you want them destroyed and twisting everything you report with that goal in mind and, apart from the brave souls at News [...

  11. 111
    Posted April 24, 2012 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    ...] ever seen published in that publication. (And that’s including The Australian‘s call to “destroy” a political party on which they purport to [...

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.