Pure Poison Podcast #8 – Floods and firearms
- Share
The Pure Poison Podcast arrives early this week and looks at the two stories that have gripped the media, the flooding in Queensland and the assassination attempt on Arizona Representative Gabrielle Giffords.
You can download the podcast, find it at the iTunes music store, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or stream it online at our podbean page.
Traveston Dam – LOLBolt blames Peter Garrett, doesn’t mention Barnanby Joyce or the Nats
Sarah Palin’s Take back the 20 poster
You see those markings over those electorate areas? They’re not gunsights. They’re … they’re surveyor’s markings! Yes, that’s what they are, SURVEYOR’S MARKINGS.
Sarah Palin has accused the left of “blood libel”. I wonder if she know that it’s a rather nasty Christian accusation against Jews. The concept has been use by Christians to commit atrocities against Jews for a thousand years.
Actually the blood libel is just another invention by the zionists to allow them to slaughter their neighbours.
It is used all over the word, in places like Albania, to justify murder and persecution.
As for Barney banana, wasn’t he calling for more dams last week?
That’s right Cuppa, which is why right after the release of the map, prominent members of the Tea Party were seen carrying theodolites to Town Hall meetings and why Sarah Palin said Don’t Retreat! Instead, take another look at the elevation!. T is for theodolite!
It’s a little known aspect of the 2nd Amendment that it gives to every American a right to keep these tools so as to maintain a well regulated landscaping party.
“The tree of liberty must occasionally be watered with a well-placed water feature” – Thomas ‘Jeffo’ Jefferson, host of the hit DIY show ‘Better Homes and Revolutions’.
That’s both grossly offensive and wrong. The blood libel predates modern Zionism by nearly 2000 years and has been a regular feature in anti-jewish pogroms through the middle ages, notably at Norwich, London & York in the late 12thC. This prefigured the expulsion of Jews from England nearly a century later.
“It’s a little known aspect of the 2nd Amendment that it gives to every American a right to keep these tools so as to maintain a well regulated landscaping party.”
Heh.
Fran@6, spot on and let that be an end of that. Meanwhile…
Oh gee Andy, the bleeding obvious answer is that the US is perfectly entitled to do so, if it can; just as Assange is entitled, if he can.
What is it about game-changing Wikileaks that people like Andy just can’t get? (The poor boy concedes it’s “so confusing.” )
“Or,” Andy cleverly asks, “is my boss out to kill Assange?”
That’s a reference to Assange’s reported gambit about having “damaging ‘insurance files’ on Rupert Murdoch and his News Corp media empire.”
Is it me who’s demented, or is the idea that Rupert might want to kill Assange a segue that exists only in Andy’s mind?