tip off

“Is News becoming embarrassed by what’s made News great?”

A News Ltd associate editor, defending News Of The World and lamenting its closure, asks:

Is News becoming embarrassed by what’s made News great?

…Is the News empire at risk of selling out the Murdoch spirit that has helped to democratise the press and challenge the smug group-think of the Left? Is Fox News next?

Ah yes, News Ltd. Famous for “democratising” the press and not in any way using media power to bully governments into giving the proprietor what he wants at the expense of ordinary voters.

Let’s hope shutting down the News of the World doesn’t make News Ltd less like News of the World was.

If it reassures our friend at Southbank: we doubt it will.

ELSEWHERE: Have you been oppressed by the smug group-think of the Left and don’t have your own column published by the biggest media conglomerate in the country to whinge hilariously about it? We gather that The Australian’s Media Diarist wants to hear from you.

UPDATE: Media Diary, first with the media news, reports today on a Crikey public apology from 2008. (Originally the MD story didn’t feature the date, because although the screenshot showed the URL and it would’ve been the work of seconds to type it into a web browser – and what professional journalist has the time to do that these days? – the twitter picture from which it was sourced apparently excluded it.) We can’t wait till Media Diary starts letting Australian readers catch up on what was happening in 2009.

42
  • 1
    BigBob
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    I was trying to think of something witty to say, but I just can’t beat what’s in that quote.

  • 2
    Andrew McIntosh
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Re phone hacking, Bolt claims – “Never in my 15 years w Newsltd have I heard of it”.

    It’s gratifying to see the majority of comments seeing through the bollocks, though. Even Bolt can’t spin this to a win. But the devil knows he’s trying.

  • 3
    Andrew McIntosh
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Same with responses to O’Neill’s piece in The Australian, too. These people just don’t know how to cut losses.

  • 4
    John Many Johns
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Poor old Andy doesn’t seem to be getting a lot of support from his commenters.

  • 5
    Lee Harvey Oddworld
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    You’re in a very sad place when boobs, bigotry, warmongering, nationalism, celebrity scandals, phone hacking, shock jocks and political propaganda make a news empire “great”.

  • 6
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Ah yes, News Ltd. Famous for “democratising” the press and not in any way using media power to bully governments into giving the proprietor what he wants at the expense of ordinary voters.

    Case in point:

    Rupert Murdoch pledged to campaign against Britain joining the euro in the event that Tony Blair called a referendum on the single currency.

    Warning that euro-membership would represent an unacceptable loss of sovereignty, the media tycoon said the very idea of trying to fuse Europe’s diverse cultures was “100 years premature”.

    But it is Mr Murdoch’s remarks that he would like to see his newspapers – the Sun, News of the World, The Times and The Sunday Times – urge readers to “Vote No” in a euro referendum that are most likely to perturb Mr Blair…

    And of course, the national broadsheet here in Oz has declared it wants to see it’s ideological enemies in parliament “destroyed”. Democratising indeed.

    Can you imagine Andrew’s response if the owner of competing media organisation openly declared they would use their newspapers to actively campaign against a Coalition government policy? He’d be saying “All of this is strangely familiar”.

  • 7
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Hilarious.

  • 8
    SHV
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    In Brisbane tonight Rupert is holding a public forum with PM Gillard about the carbon tax.

    The problem is it ISN’T OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!

    Speaking of “tax” and what made “News Corp” great, well I wish I had tax arrangements like this:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/12/column-dcjohnston-murdoch-idUSN1E76A1NH20110712

    Over the past four years Murdoch's U.S.-based News Corp. has made money on income taxes. Having earned $10.4 billion in profits, News Corp. would have been expected to pay $3.6 billion at the 35 percent corporate tax rate. Instead, it actually collected $4.8 billion in income tax refunds, all or nearly all from the U.S. government.

  • 9
    quantize
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    For all the claims of ‘smug group-think’ made by these right wing mouthpieces, I’ve never seen the effect more clearly as on actual News Ltd blogs…perhaps it’s their um ‘editing’ and comment selection that presents such an extremely lop-sided view (to create the impression everyone is in unison?) but most blogs where there is genuine debate tend to represent a relatively wider spectrum of dissenting views…

    Projection is of course one of the most commonly used tools of the right.

    You have to wonder…just how low does that company have to go to make their audience question their credibility?

    Do they honestly believe a company with a culture (no matter how distant geographically) that condones hacking the phones of missing (murdered) girls would really hesitate to utterly misrepresent science in favor of corporate interests?

    It beggars belief that the Murdoch progeny was unaware of this culture…much less that anyone should take seriously their claim that they present a credible source of ‘both sides’ of the phony ‘climate debate’

  • 10
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Bolt thinks average Australians (not the readers of his blog – or this one) give a crap about what happens to Fox News, haha.

    They couldn’t care less.

  • 11
    Holden Back
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Classic News Ltd techniques used to defend the indefensible for decades. They’re just particularly amusing when its their own corporate culture they’re trying to defend.

    As for Overington- pfft. Maybe George Newhouse wants to do an interview?

  • 12
    Angra
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    For an accurate description of who reads which UK papers, you can’t beat this.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeQC45KunwA

  • 13
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Not a Murdoch paper but:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI

  • 14
    quantize
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Oh but what about the Merc drivers in the great european outdoors?

    those oh-so-cultured climate denying readers?

    Just that he posted that picture is an embarrassing insight to his ego (delusion?)…we know he reads the knuckle dragging racism and stupidity in his comments..like those twits are recreating scenes from imported car ads!

  • 15
    shepherdmarilyn
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    I wonder how the right wing group think editorialisers of the Murdoch rags who write the same editorials each week, particularly over their rabid agreement to murder iraqis, feel about right wing group think.

    The story is a marvel to behold and I wish the Australian pollies would find the balls the Brits finally have.

  • 16
    Sharkie
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Poor oppressed andy. Because of teh evil lefties, all he’s got to defend himself is his own TV show, a regular column, a blog, multiple radio appearances, a book, and the occasional interview on Today Tonight. Not to mention a ten year tax-payer funded stint on the national broadcaster.
    Talk about lack of free rightie speak in this country.

  • 17
    mondo rock
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    WTF is a “democratised” press?

    Is this just a fancy way of saying that the Murdoch media edits its news to fit with what it thinks the audience wants to hear? Didn’t Penbo admit something similar recently?

    Because that’s not journalism – that’s entertainment.

  • 18
    rhwombat
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    actually mondo, I think that more that the Murdocracy edits its news to fit with what it wants the audience to think. That’s not entertainment, that’s propaganda.

  • 19
    Sancho
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    I see. News Ltd doesn’t have any political ideology or agenda; it’s just an “empire” dedicated to challenging the left.

  • 20
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Angra @12 – I knew that would be the link. Honestly, there’s a Yes (Prime) Minister clip for pretty much every political event.

  • 21
    quantize
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    http://www.smh.com.au/business/news-apologises-for-website-virus-after-hack-attack-20110713-1hdeh.html

    Damn, for a moment I thought AB might have been the virus

  • 22
    fred p
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    I like how the Southbank Jester carries on about the Left’s smug groupthink while yet again linking to a News Ltd piece to bolster an argument. Nothing smug about that, though. No, sir.

  • 23
    tinypinkthing
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    You Go Girl (or boy)
    Love your work.

  • 24
    tinypinkthing
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    OOp’S
    I meant The Shepherd.

  • 25
    monkeywrench
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Oh Dear!
    I wonder how The Jester can blame this on Teh Lefts? I wonder if he’s worried his own operations will be axed at some stage? Tee Hee!

  • 26
    monkeywrench
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Big, big trouble comin’, kemosabe…

  • 27
    heavylambs
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    Overington trumpets that the News Ltd Code of Conduct IS available on the internet, and links to it.There it is…available courtesy of ABC MediaWatch.

  • 28
    AR
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    A bit dated but, Nick Davies, who finally got Mudorc in the Grauniad, wrote Flat Earth News, 12 years ago.
    It ought to become a text book for meeja students, as once was Neil Postman’s “amusing Ourselves to Death” but, like Marshall McLuhan’s “Understanding the Media” whence came the much neglected the Medium is the Message or, more accurately these drear days, “massage”.
    Probably too many big words or difficult ideas for anyone under 40. RN is doing an homage to MMcL this w/e.

  • 29
    Ray Hunt
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    US Senator warns Rupert Murdoch of “serious consequences” if the alleged hacking of mobile phones belonging to the families of 9/11 victims is proved:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/13/phone-hacking-reaches-us

  • 30
    quantize
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Big, big trouble comin’, kemosabe…

    Oh to be a fly on the wall – Clear the poop decks! Danger Will Robinson!

  • 31
    quantize
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    http://www.smh.com.au/business/expenses-review-for-murdochs-aussie-papers-20110713-1hdot.html

    yeh more of that spectacular self-regulation….

  • 32
    SHV
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Lucky this is the “new” code of conduct, eh Hartigan?

    One of the primary foundations of good business and free markets is the rule of law

    Still, mistakes happen don’t they?

    That error, in the evidence of Mr Hartigan, not only revealed a clear error in his memory, but, more importantly, an evident lack of care exercised by him in giving his evidence before me.

    Ooops! Well…

    After that adjournment, Mr O'Bryan questioned Mr Blunden generally about the issue. Mr Blunden then gave what, to my perception, was clearly a pre-rehearsed speech, that he considered it would have been improper for him to tell Guthrie about his dealings with Hartigan, because if Hartigan did not decide to terminate Guthrie's contract, Blunden could not have gone back to the office and worked with Guthrie. The answer which Mr Blunden gave, and the manner in which he gave it, showed that it was the product of thought over lunch. It is flawed. At that time, according to Blunden, Guthrie was not listening to his advice anyway. It would not have undermined his authority with Guthrie to have told him the truth, namely, that he was pressing Hartigan to remove him. Rather, if anything, it would have enhanced Blunden's position, by impressing on Guthrie the gravity of what Mr Blunden considered to be the situation. I do not accept Mr Blunden's proffered explanation in his cross-examination, which, as I have stated, bears all the hallmarks of ex post facto rationalisation

    Oh dear.

    http://www.springhillvoice.com/judicialcriticism.html

    Anyway, NOW they are going to respect the rule of law.

    It must be true. Otherwise, why would they have so many lawyers?

  • 33
    SHV
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    And speaking of “News” and the law, The Guardian is reporting that:

    Tom Crone, the News of the World's long-standing legal manager, is leaving News International

    Something about rodents and sinking ships springs to mind!

  • 34
    Just Me
    Posted July 13, 2011 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    If ever there was an opportunity to indulge in some legitimate, guilt-free schadenfreude, then Mr Murdoch’s recent ‘misfortunes’ are certainly it.

    As ye sow, so ye shall reap, old man. A bitter harvest indeed.

    Karma really is a bitch.

  • 35
    SHV
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    And, finally, one of my favourites from that case where Murdoch’s Minions copped a whacking:

    Mr Clarke gave evidence as to two incidents, which occurred shortly after Mr Guthrie commenced in his position as editor-in-chief on 19 February 2007. The first incident was an "altercation" in which (according to Mr Clarke) the plaintiff had a conversation with Mr Bolt, a journalist of the Herald Sun, and which concluded with Mr Guthrie making an inappropriate gesture to Bolt. When Mr Clarke learnt of that incident, he told Guthrie that he should not be making such gestures to the journalist, and Guthrie dismissed it as a light hearted matter. Mr Clarke stated that that matter concerned him substantially. ...

    What “gesture” to Mr Bolt could possibly qualify as “inappropriate”?

    How must it be to get through life with both a glass jaw and a pin dick?

  • 36
    Adam Rope
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 2:40 am | Permalink

    Forgot to mention on the other thread (weekly) about a great sketch from John Finnemore on last weeks The Now Show, about the News Limited revelations in the UK.

    Still available as a podcast – and well worth the price of admittance.

    http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/friday-night-comedy-from-bbc/id265307784

    Please all, have a listen.

  • 37
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 5:02 am | Permalink

    In News Limited’s statement that they were pulling out of the BSkyB bid, they said that they did not think they could continue in “the current climate”.

    They deny climate change on one hand, and then the climate changes for them on the other. LOL

    Well, it made me laugh.

  • 38
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 5:06 am | Permalink

    Oops . It actually said “in this climate”. That’s what you get for using an ipad to post. D’oh

  • 39
    quantize
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    “in this climate”

    maybe they just mean ‘weather’ since most of their ‘journalists’ and readers don’t know the difference anyway?

  • 40
    Rohan
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    it was circulated on Twitter today, dateless.

    And desperate.

  • 41
    John Many Johns
    Posted July 15, 2011 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Apparently Fox News won’t touch Murdoch story with a “ten foot turban”
    http://www.boingboing.net/2011/07/14/fox-news-wont-touch.html

  • 42
    Vesper Lynd
    Posted July 18, 2011 at 7:18 am | Permalink

    According to this PR guy on Fox New, NTW is the real victim in all this

    http://www.boingboing.net/2011/07/17/fox-friends-lash-out.html

    Besides it all happened so long ago, and there are currently more pressing issues.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...