tip off

Elsewhere: Kohler on Rinehart’s play for Fairfax

There’s a bit of resigned sighing around the internet today at the thought of mining heiress, right-wing lobbyist and Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart buying a 15% stake in Fairfax.

Alan Kohler suggests we shouldn’t be too worried:

Gina Rinehart is likely to find investing in Fairfax Media a deeply frustrating experience, whether she’s trying to influence the newspapers or just make money… she will need to buy more than 15% of Fairfax to have any say — even if she does manage to get on the board.

It’s possible that Fairfax board meetings will become slightly less civilised affairs if Australia’s richest person is present as part-owner of the company, but 15% doesn’t buy you the ability to change strategy or management.

It’s true that 10% of the Ten Network got her on the board, and the sudden appearance of a Sunday morning TV show by her favourite columnist, Andrew Bolt, is often cited as evidence of her influence, but there is no way that would have happened against the better judgment of Ten’s programmers… to force Andrew Bolt into The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, I’d say she would need to buy 51% of the company, and even then she’d struggle.

So cheer up. It’s not like The Age or SMH have been effective advocates for anything recently, anyway.

7
  • 1
    Aliar Jones
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    So cheer up. It’s not like The Age or SMH have been effective advocates for anything recently, anyway.

    Sure, they haven’t been the cesspit of stupidity and right wing lunacy that News and Ten are either…

  • 2
    Fran Barlow
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Personally, I’d regard 15% in a scattered shareholding as having ample firepower to have her repulsive way with them.

  • 3
    surlysimon
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    How’s this for a big surprise
    http://www.perthnow.com.au/business/local-business/rinehart-appoints-plimer-to-board-roles/story-e6frg2s3-1226259721980

  • 4
    AR
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    AJ – unfortunately, we are in deep doo-doo, when the evil of two (or more) lessers is a hopeful sign. Jeez, my bugger my country.

  • 5
    dexitroboper
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Who needs Gina Rinehart when the Fin Review editorial comes up with crap like “Labor’s anti-business Fair Work Act” when discussing Abbott’s press conference.

  • 6
    Fran Barlow
    Posted February 1, 2012 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Sure, they haven’t been the cesspit of stupidity and right wing lunacy that News and Ten are either…

    You say that, but The Age employs Grattan …

  • 7
    Brizben
    Posted February 2, 2012 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    When do cross media ownership laws kick in? re: Fairfax and Channel 10.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...