<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treasury Climate Modeling Full of Holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2008/10/20/treasury-climate-modeling-full-of-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2008/10/20/treasury-climate-modeling-full-of-holes/</link>
	<description>Nourishing the environmental debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:52:07 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2008/10/20/treasury-climate-modeling-full-of-holes/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>J G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/?p=188#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I guess Treasury is more interested in giving comfort to whiny polluters instead of making accurate estimations. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anyone left who seriously believes the price of oil is going down any time soon, let alone by a whopping 40%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Treasury is more interested in giving comfort to whiny polluters instead of making accurate estimations. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anyone left who seriously believes the price of oil is going down any time soon, let alone by a whopping 40%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnergyPedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2008/10/20/treasury-climate-modeling-full-of-holes/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>EnergyPedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/?p=188#comment-121</guid>
		<description>There are certainly grumblings and murmurings within the energy industry about many of the assumptions in both Garnaut and Treasury modelling.

Gas prices are largely uncertain.  The increasing certainty about LNG export from QLD would indicate significant price rises, however that depends on the supply vs export capacity vs domestic demand eqns.  Most insiders assume that the Qld government will quarantine a % of all gas reserves for domestic consumption (similar to WA).  Gas prices forecast are bi-modal, either around current values or more than double close to international LNG price-parity.

It could be worth asking what assumptions were made regarding residential energy consumption.  Then ask what the has been assumed by regulated distribution and transmission companies.  Most are forecasting a drop in per customer electricity consumption before the impact of ETS on prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certainly grumblings and murmurings within the energy industry about many of the assumptions in both Garnaut and Treasury modelling.</p>
<p>Gas prices are largely uncertain.  The increasing certainty about LNG export from QLD would indicate significant price rises, however that depends on the supply vs export capacity vs domestic demand eqns.  Most insiders assume that the Qld government will quarantine a % of all gas reserves for domestic consumption (similar to WA).  Gas prices forecast are bi-modal, either around current values or more than double close to international LNG price-parity.</p>
<p>It could be worth asking what assumptions were made regarding residential energy consumption.  Then ask what the has been assumed by regulated distribution and transmission companies.  Most are forecasting a drop in per customer electricity consumption before the impact of ETS on prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hollo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2008/10/20/treasury-climate-modeling-full-of-holes/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/?p=188#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Great post, Anna, particularly that point on CCS infrastructure assumptions!

Just a call out for any other potential questions on the treasury modelling that Christine can ask of Treasury in Senate Estimates tomorrow! Let us know via Senator.Milne@aph.gov.au if so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Anna, particularly that point on CCS infrastructure assumptions!</p>
<p>Just a call out for any other potential questions on the treasury modelling that Christine can ask of Treasury in Senate Estimates tomorrow! Let us know via <a href="mailto:Senator.Milne@aph.gov.au">Senator.Milne@aph.gov.au</a> if so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
