by Crikey intern Bhakthi Puvanenthiran
It’s been two days days since the White House released the most significant government paper on climate change to date, and yet environmental opinion writers and commentators the globe over seemed to have missed it. Wait, no, Andrew Bolt had a bit of a go, but more on that later.
The report, which was put together by a really large number of White House agencies agrees with what many have argued for some time — if emissions and greenhouse gases aren’t curbed soon, temperatures, rainfall patterns and sea levels will continue changing for the worse.
“What we would want to have people take away is that climate change is happening now, and it’s actually beginning to affect our lives,” says Thomas R Karl, director of the National Climatic Data Center at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and a principal author of the report.
Most of the coverage of this landmark report has, essentially, swallowed the news whole. Stories from leading news sources (New York Times, The Guardian, Time) are mainly quoting the report, giving some background but leaving it at that. Even the ABC couldn’t find another angle.
Of the little commentary that exists, most of it looks at the “strong language” or a comment made by Jane Lubchenco, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association suggesting that the report was a “game changer”. Exciting stuff!
As mentioned earlier, Andrew Bolt’s already had a bit of a dig at the report, linking to one of the scientists cited in the report who claims his work was misrepresented. Yes indeed, Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colarado Roger Pielke Jr makes some interesting points on his blog suggesting sections of the report regarding natural disasters were a bit of an academic flop.
While Piekle’s criticisms seem legitimate, his claims focus solely on extreme events like hurricanes and certainly aren’t significant enough to throw doubt on the fundamental claims of the government report.
That aside, the lack of commentary on the report remains puzzling. One plausible explanation is that the release of the report seems to have been intentionally timed to coincide (though it’s been denied) with deliberation over the Waxman-Markey America Climate and Energy Security Bill. Grist, which carried one of the more detailed analyses concludes this:
…sources close to the process affirmed that Tuesday’s release is part of a coordinated effort to rally support for the ACES legislation. The administration is making sure that the document gets to key members of Congress. Report authors confirmed to Grist that they began holding briefings on the assessment on Capitol Hill on Monday and will continue the briefings throughout the week.
Similarly Suzanne Goldenberg writes for the Guardian:
Today’s release is part of a carefully crafted strategy by the White House to help build public support for Obama’s agenda and boost the prospects of a climate change bill now making its way through Congress.”
Perhaps, as the Wall Street Journal reckons, both pundits and politicians alike are too busy tussling over the imminent bill and the way forward with climate change to pay attention to a report that for all intents and purposes was stating the obvious.
6 Comments
“That aside, the lack of commentary on the report remains puzzling.”
That’s largely because it’s rubbish. As well as being evidentially bereft, economically reckless and electorally suicidal.
Look at how ANU Professor Will Steffen refused to answer Senator Fielding’s questions directly saying its now OCEANS that are the climate drivers and then HEY PRESTO releases a report saying rising ocean temperatures are going to kill us all.
The debate has devolved into a joke. Do you even remember the punch-line?
CONSPIRACY!!!1!
The debate has devolved into a joke mainly because the positions left to debate are farcical. The scientific consensus has been stated, its been proven, and its been accepted by anyone actually open to being convinced. I’m all for democracy, but open-mike night at the climate change debate is over. The only questions left to answer are whether we act, or whether we really should give Steve Fielding a nobel prize for being the most prescient climate scientist of his age. One way or another, the debate will be over within a decade.
Sigh. MPM toeing the company line yet again. Evidentially bereft eh? What information do you have to support that? Are you suggesting that you have better information than all of the Government agencies in the US that wrote the report? What specific points in the report do you think are incorrect?
(quote)What information do you have to support that?(end quote)
Do you really have that much trust in Government agencies PAID BY EASY GRANT MONNIES with strings attached and believe they are squeaky clean?
An example of the poor state of science now and why MPM said” “That’s largely because it’s rubbish” and meteorologist and Weather Channel founder John Coleman said “global-warming-is-a-crock”.
Just like the IPCC the ABC the CSIRO or any Government funded agencies with $-grant-$ monnies’s why would they bite the hand that feeds them and not give them a pre concieved biassed outcome ?
“The latest example is in Queensland where the CSIRO is given $2 million to help the government fight global warming.”
http://www.countryman.com.au/article/2397.html
AND
How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big government we have to struggle so to stop it? The key players are now all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax we citizens for our carbon footprints.
http://www.dcthornton.com/2009/01/29/global-warming-is-a-crock/
———
I’ll give 101 reasons why AGW and Co2 reduction scheme’s will die( As well as being evidentially bereft) and “What specific points in the report do you think are incorrect?”
(1)
NASA Says Climate Shifting to Cooler Temperatures
The allegedly warming earth is in for about 30 years of cooling according to NASA
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10may_longrange.htm
______________________________
(2)
New Peer-Reviewed Study Says Global Warming Takes a Break for Nearly 20 Years?
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=a17defa8-802a-23ad-4912-8ab7138a7c3f&Issue_id=#update
______________________________
(3)
We’re Getting Colder, Not Warmer
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/02/were_getting_co.html
______________________________
(4)
Widescale Global Cooling
http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Worldwide+Global+Cooling/article10866.htm
______________________________
(5)
The Coming of a New Ice Age
By Gerald E. Marsh Sunday, February 24, 2008
Yet another dissenter of the church of global warming. Gerald Marsh is a retired physicist from the Argonne National Laboratory and a former consultant to the Department of Defense on strategic nuclear technology and policy in the Reagan, Bush, and Clinton Administration.
______________________________
(6)
Russian Scientists Forecast Global Cooling in 6-9 Years – August 25, 2006. Created
Moscow – Researchers with the Russian Academy of Sciences warned Wednesday that the Earth could be headed for a 60-year cooldown, the news agency Interfax reported.
Scientists based at the academy’s Pulkovskaya Observatory in St Petersburg, Russia, said they expected a gradual decrease in global temperatures in 2012-15, followed by a more dramatic, 60-year period of cold to come in 2055-60.
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, chief researcher at the observatory, said the predictions were based on solar cycles, and that after the 60-year glimpse of the Ice Ages warmer weather could be expected
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/science/nature/news/article_1225169.php/Russian_scientists_predict_new_Ice_Age_in_50_years
______________________________
(7)
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera of the Institute of Geophysics at the University of Mexico states that “In about ten years the Earth will enter a “little ice age” which will last from 60 to 80 years and may be caused by the decrease in solar activity,” according to a report in the major Mexican newspaper Milenio Diario.
______________________________
(8)
With 30 years of cooling,Look out agriculture. The wine industry, fruits and nut growers will be hit with a shorter growing season and more threats of frost-induced crop devastation, among other things.
______________________________
(9)
The Science of Global Warming in Perspective
News Flash: Twenty Year Cool-Down
Mainstream media ignores it
http://nov55.com/gbwm.html
______________________________
(10)
Solar Activity Diminishes; Researchers Predict Another Ice Age – Sunspots have all but vanished in recent years.
http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31:vanishing-sunspots-prelude-to-global-cooling&catid=1:latest
Excerpt: Dr. Kenneth Tapping is worried about the sun. Solar activity comes in regular cycles, but the latest one is refusing to start. Sunspots have all but vanished, and activity is suspiciously quiet. The last time this happened was 400 years ago — and it signaled a solar event known as a “Maunder Minimum,” along with the start of what we now call the “Little Ice Age.” Tapping, a solar researcher and project director for Canada’s National Research Council, says it may be happening again. Overseeing a giant radio telescope he calls a “stethoscope for the sun,” Tapping says, if the pattern doesn’t change quickly, the earth is in for some very chilly weather. […] In 2005, Russian astronomer Khabibullo Abdusamatov predicted the sun would soon peak, triggering a rapid decline in world temperatures. Only last month, the view was echoed by Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, a fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. who advised the world to “stock up on fur coats.” Sorokhtin, who calls man’s contribution to climate change “a drop in the bucket,” predicts the solar minimum to occur by the year 2040, with icy weather lasting till 2100 or beyond. Observational data seems to support the claims — or doesn’t contradict it, at least. […] Researcher Dr. Timothy Patterson, director of the Geoscience Center at Carleton University, shares the concern. Patterson is finding “excellent correlations” between solar fluctuations, a relationship that historically, he says doesn’t exist between CO2 and past climate changes.
_____________________________
(11)
Harmful Man Induced Climate Change (Global Warming) Refuted
“Our Global Climate Is Now Actually Now Cooling”
“The record cold of the decades of the 1890’s, 1940’s, 1970’s, 1980’s and most recently the bitter northern hemisphere winters of 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 argue against the occurrence of harmful man induced climate change (global warming). Also Winter 2000-2001 and 2004-2005 in Siberian Russia, as well as Winter 2004 in Antarctica were the coldest in recorded history. And let’s not forget that January 2004 in Boston, MA was the coldest January in 111 years. Grand Forks, ND set it’s all time record low of -44 deg. below zero F, Fosston, MN also at -50 deg. below zero F and Saskatchewan, Canada saw minimum temperatures fall to -62 deg. below zero F, all in Winter 2003-2004.”
“Satellite based systems that measure the complete land, ocean, atmosphere interface show a definite cooling trend between 1979-2004 of -0.5 deg, F.
Radiosonde balloon launches show no temperature change between 1960-2004. Antarctica has been cooling at the rate of 1.4 deg. F per every ten years for the past 20 years. Also between 1895 and 2004 January average temperature in Florida has fallen approximately 1 deg. F. Also glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are expanding. How can that possibly be if harmful man induced climate change (global warming) is occurring???”
The Heartland Institute: Instant Expert’s Guide to Global Warming 1,000 Year Climate History Accurate “Thermometers” in Space – NASA
“Unlike the surface-based temperatures, global temperature measurements of the Earth’s lower atmosphere obtained from satellites reveal no definitive warming trend over the past two decades. The slight trend that is in the data actually appears to be downward. The largest fluctuations in the satellite temperature data are not from any man-made activity, but from natural phenomena such as large volcanic eruptions from Mt. Pinatubo, and from El Ni?o. So the programs which model global warming in a computer say the temperature of the Earth’s lower atmosphere should be going up markedly, but actual measurements of the temperature of the lower atmosphere reveal no such pronounced activity.” ?
_____________________________
(12)
Global Cooling is Here! “63 new snowfall records”
“Evidence for Predicting Global Cooling for the Next Three Decades”
By Professor Don Easterbrook, Western Washington University.
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/global_cooling_is_here_evidence_for_predicting_global_cooling_for_the_next_
_____________________________
(13)
Look to Mars for the truth on global warming
Global Warming on other planets.
The correlation of both HOT and COLD temperatures on Earth and Mars,Would the recent heavy snow falls here on Earth and the recent snowing of the Mars ice caps suggest’s the Sun plays a much larger role than the “negligible”role the IPCC.say.
_____________________________
(14)
CO2 and methane continuing to rise Yet, temps are going DOWN,Exactly
the OPPOSITE tipping point to what was proposed !!
The world hasn’t warmed for a decade, and has even cooled for several years
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/files/080718%20oped%20bolt%20global%20cooling.pdf
_____________________________
(15)
Arctic permafrost regions have been through much higher temps in the past
and have not caused any thing like a tipping point.
_____________________________
(16)
MIT scientists baffled by global warming theory and contradicts scientific data.
http://tinyurl.com/mit-scientists-baffled-by-glob
_____________________________
(17)
CO2 is no more of a pollutant than water is.
Co2 is proven harmless. Check Monckton at SPPI.Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a harmless, inert gas and would be benificial to plant life.
_____________________________
(18)
CO2 rises AFTER the temperature rise. This is proof that CO2 does not cause temperature rise.
_____________________________
(19)
Some 31,072 American scientists 9,021 with Ph.D. degrees have signed a petition rejecting the assertion that global warming has reached a crisis stage and is caused by human activity.
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the earth.”
http://www.petitionproject.org/
______________________________
(20)
Richard Courtney’s analysis of the structural social powers in the global warming industry here ( http://www.john-daly.com/history.htm ).
_____________________________
(21)
THIS EXAMPLE OF THE IPCC USING FRAUD,LIES AND IS IGNORING OF EVIDENCE!
“False Low Pre-industrial CO2 in the Atmosphere”.
Climate Change: Incorrect information on pre-industrial CO2
Statement written for the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
March 2004
Statement of Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski
Chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection Warsaw, Poland
This ice was deposited in 1890 AD, and the CO2 concentration was 328 ppmv, not about 290 ppmv, as needed by man-made warming hypothesis. The CO2
http://www.john-daly.com/zjiceco2.htm
_____________________________
(22)
The IPCC IGNORING OTHER EVIDENCE
Is there an alternative to ice-core samples, which are but proxies from which assumptions about the historical composition of the atmosphere can be made? “Yes, there are several other proxies, and they lead to different findings about CO2,” Dr. Jaworowski states. “But we don’t need to rely on proxies at all.
“Scientists from numerous disciplines have been examining CO2 since the beginning of the 19th century, and they have left behind a record of tens of thousands of direct, real-time measurements. These measurements tell a far different story about CO2 — they demonstrate, for example, that CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have fluctuated greatly, and that several times in the past 200 years CO2 concentrations have exceeded today’s levels.
“The IPCC rejects these direct measurements, some taken by Nobel Prize winners. They prefer the view of CO2 as seen through ice.”
LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com
Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Urban Renaissance Institute and Consumer Policy Institute, divisions of Energy Probe Research Foundation.
______________________________
(23)
It will be a disaster far greater than the worst warming predictions.
Perhaps we are Doomed not by A G W, but by the Politicions and the self interest of some climate scientists who will regret their actions in years to come. Because we needed POWER STATIONS to keep warm and they denied them to us by prattling on about Global warming when all along, when all we had was NATURAL CLIMATE CHANGE
Again the polar ice provides a modern parallel. Last year you were told – shock, horror! — that Arctic sea ice was at its lowest extent since satellite measurements began.
What went unreported was that Antarctic sea ice was simultaneously at a
record high. The collusion of my fellow journalists in the deception is
disturbing. Although the big freeze in Antarctica was plainly announced
in a press release from the US weather bureau, NOAA, not a single
newspaper in North America or Europe carried this unfavourable story
_____________________________
(24)
Agriculture, which experienced “unprecedented growth” during the past warm phase, may now be in serious trouble as things cool down.
_____________________________
(25)
There have been 50% more spots per cycle than in the beginning of the 20th century,
http://www.exploratorium.edu/sunspots/index.html
Near the end, there is a chart which shows sun spot cycles every 11 years. It also shows the number of spots per cycle. In the last part of the 20th century there were 50% more spots per cycle than in the beginning of the 20th century. QED. Since spots are associated with solar flares, more energy was delivered later in the century than earlier.
It’s at least as convincing as CO2.
AND HERE
Yearly Averaged Sunspot Numbers for past 400 years:
http://science.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/images/ssn_yearly.jpg
______________________________
(26)
We are comming out of an ice-age.So any warming or the rate of warming is nothing unusual.After all it’s only been within temperature error margins.SEE GRAPH;
Dr. Roy Spencer
Latest Global Average Tropospheric Temperatures
http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures.php
______________________________
(27)
Cloud Changes influence climate NOT Carbon Dioxide as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere.
Global Warming as a Natural Response to Cloud Changes Associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)by Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/article-pdo-warming.php
______________________________
(28)
The oceans have not warmed up at all over the past four or five years.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88520025
______________________________
(29)
The best measurements of global air temperatures come from American weather satellites, and they show wobbles but no overall change since 1999.
______________________________
(30)
Global Warming on other planets.
Any reference to why is Mars getting warmer and colder in parrelel with Earth if humans cause global warming?
Look to Mars for the truth on global warming
The correlation of both HOT and COLD temperatures on Earth and Mars,Would the recent heavy snow falls here on Earth and the recent snowing of the Mars ice caps suggest’s the Sun plays a much larger role than the “negligible”role the IPCC claims.
______________________________
(31)
ABC also ensures that heatwaves,storms and droughts make headlines, while contrary symptoms, such as;
Any reference to the beneficial effects of CO2, e.g. as plant “food”, is omitted.
Any reference to needed solutions to extend the current interglacial period indefinitely.
______________________________
(32)
“It’s easier to get funding if you can show some evidence for impending climate disasters.”
______________________________
(33)
“The cosmic ray primary driver theory”
Svensmark and his small team at the Danish National Space Center hit the jackpot in the summer of 2005. appeared in the Proceedings of the Royal Society
SEE; The Chilling Stars, co-authored by Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and New Scientist, Nigel Calder, published by Icon books. We are not exaggerating, we believe, when we subtitle it “A new theory of climate change”.
______________________________
(34)
THE COST OF PERPETUATING THE COST OF THE GLOBAL WARMING ASSUMPTION
An assumption that many of us meteorologists find simplistic and dubious, at best.
After spending $440 billion per year on an unproved theory without convincing results that will sponge $400 out of every man, woman and child in the United States
http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2006/20061108124934.aspx
In October 2006, media reports called for increased government spending to the tune of $180 billion per year, or $400 per man, woman and child in the U.S. Previously, the media also promoted joining the Kyoto Protocol, which could have costs U.S. taxpayers up to $440 billion per year.
Humans’ contribution – to global warming remains very much in dispute, but that hasn’t stopped the left-wing crusade against A HARMLESS carbon dioxide and other gases.
U.S. media have embraced a recent British study that calls for American taxpayers to pay at least 1 percent of gross domestic product or even more – up to $180 billion per year toward a new emissions-lowering system. That works out to a minimum of $400 for every man, woman and child in the United States – per year. If we don’t pay, they say, calamity ensues.
______________________________
(35)
Despite that indisputable increase of
CO2 in the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
______________________________
(36)
Sunspots have all but vanished, and activity is suspiciously quiet. The last time this happened was 400 years ago — and it signaled a solar event known as a “Maunder Minimum,” along with the start of what we now call the “Little Ice Age.”
______________________________
(37)
The Disturbing corruption of the peer-review process
A Major Deception on Global Warming by Frederick Seitz
http://www.sepp.org/Archive/controv/ipcccont/Item05.htm
_____________________________
(38)
(A). A crucial chapter of the IPCC’s report was altered between the time of its formal acceptance and its printing.
(B). Whether in accord with IPCC rules or not—still a hotly debated matter—”there is some evidence that the revision process did result in a subtle shift . . . that . . . tended to favour arguments that aligned with the report’s broad conclusions.” (Critics of the IPCC would have used much stronger words.) The editorial further admits that “phrases that might have been (mis)interpreted as undermining these conclusions have disappeared.”
(C). “IPCC officials,” quoted (but not named) by Nature, claim that the reason for the revisions to the chapter was “to ensure that it conformed to a ‘policymakers’ summary’ of the full report….” Their claim begs the obvious question: Should not a summary conform to the underlying scientific report rather than vice versa?
The IPCC summary itself, a political document, is economical with the truth: It has problems with selective presentation of facts, not the least of which is that it totally ignores global temperature data gathered by weather satellites, which contradict the results of models used to predict a substantial future warming. It seems to me that IPCC officials, having failed to validate the current climate models, are now desperately grasping at straws to buttress their (rather feeble) conclusion that “the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on climate.” In this crusade to provide a scientific cover for political action, they are misusing the work of respected scientists who never made extravagant claims about future warming.
It is clear that politicians and activists striving for international controls on energy use (to be discussed in Geneva in July when the parties to the Global Climate Treaty convene) are anxious to stipulate that the science is settled and trying to marginalize the growing number of scientific critics. It is disappointing, however, to find a respected science journal urging in an editorial that “charges . . . that [the IPCC report on global climate change has been 'scientifically cleansed' should not be allowed to undermine efforts to win political support for abatement strategies."
S. Fred Singer, President
The Science & Environmental Policy Project
Fairfax, Va.
______________________________
(39)
Arctic was definitely colder than 2007
http://adognamedkyoto.blogspot.com/search/label/global%20cooling
William Chapman, a researcher with the Arctic Climate Research Center at the University of Illinois, tells DailyTech that this year the Arctic was "definitely colder" than 2007. Chapman also says part of the reason for the large ice loss in 2007 was strong winds from Siberia, which affect both ice formation and drift, forcing ice into warmer waters where it melts.
______________________________
(40)
Good evidence that the temperature response to rising CO2 levels is logarithmic, not linear. A subsequent doubling of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere will not produce the amount of temperature increase the first doubling did. SEE GRAPH
http://petesplace-peter.blogspot.com/2007/11/atmospheric-co2-levels-follow.html
______________________________
(41)
It will be a disaster far greater than the worst warming predictions.
Perhaps we are Doomed not by A G W, but by the ABC,the IPCC, Politicions and the self interest of some climate scientists who will regret their actions in years to come. Because we needed POWER STATIONS to keep warm and they denied them to us by prattling on about Global warming when all along, when all we had was NATURAL CLIMATE CHANGE
______________________________
(42)
Prof. Beck's paper
"180 YEARS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GAS ANALYSIS BY CHEMICAL METHODS"
Since 1812, the CO2 concentration in northern hemispheric air has fluctuated exhibiting three high level maxima around 1825, 1857 and 1942 the latter showing more than 400 ppm. Between 1857 and 1958, the Pettenkofer process was the standard analytical method for determining atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and usually achieved an accuracy better than 3%. These determinations were made by several scientists of Nobel Prize level distinction.
OR
The Misra data in Poona India, agricultural area with daily fluctuations of 250 ppm wth peaks of 500 ppm...
http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/misra.gif
______________________________
(43)
Human CO2 is a small percentage of total CO2 emitted by natural sources
The atmosphere is only 0.04% CO2.
The Anthroprogenic is only1% OF THAT 0.04% CO2.
______________________________
(44)
All the relationships between Gore, Strong, and carbon credit trading are well documented here; http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1185475433.pdf
______________________________
(45)
Scientist That Accuse UN’s IPCC of Falsifying Data and Destroying Evidence
http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2008/update-the-global-warming-file/
-----------
UN-IPCC Oficials and some Scientists may be involved in corruption
PLEASE WATCH THIS YOUTUBE MOVIE OF Dr ROY SPENCER'S TESTIMONY TO CONGRESS FIRST. http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=Qzf6z-oHP8U
FROM HERE;
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/22/roy-spencers-testimony-before-congress-backs-up-moncktons-assertions-on-climate-sensitivity/
______________________________
(46)
CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., http://tinyurl.com/ytjkgf
______________________________
(47)
Mathematician & engineer Dr. David Evans, who did carbon accounting for the Australian Government, recently detailed his conversion to a skeptic
______________________________
(48)
Former IPCC Member Slams UN Scientists' Lack of Geologic Knowledge
Tom V. Segalstad who was an Expert Reviewer for the IPCC’s third assessment repo
______________________________
(49)
(EMPHASIS ADDED)
Ernst-Georg Beck calls the falsification of the CO2 record "The greatest scandal in the modern history of science".
http://tinyurl.com/3sxngj
______________________________
(50)
Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, one of Israel’s top young award winning scientists, recanted his belief that manmade emissions were driving climate change
______________________________
(51)
Dr. Kiminori Itoh, award-winning PhD
Japanese IPCC scientists says global warming “worst scientific scandal”
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=37
AE6E96-802A-23AD-4C8A-EDF6D8150789
http://tinyurl.com/58oho8
______________________________
(52)
Professor Dr. William J.R. Alexander, Emeritus of the Department of Civil and Bio-systems
Engineering at the University of Pretoria in South Africa and a former member of the United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters. Man-made global warming is not real.
______________________________
(53)
John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of The Weather Channel, calls the GW movement the greatest scam in history.
______________________________
(54)
Swedish Scientist Accuses UN’s IPCC of Falsifying Data and Destroying Evidence
UN Destroys Documents on Global Warming. Need any more proof of how dishonest and unwilling to discuss the real facts the U.N is when it comes to global warming?
I’ve documented many instances of outright deceit and blatant bald-faced lies ‘man-caused’ that global warming agendists have foisted on the world, and this latest disclosure just further demonstrates the fact that ‘man-caused’ global warming agendists are infact not producing honest, open, fully accessible reports that are open to critical scrutiny.
Yellow Science- pure and simple! and being perpetrated by global warming agendists).
______________________________
(55)
‘IPCC theory of anthropogenic warming is a hoax’ says Patrick Carroll, retired Environment Canada meteorologist
______________________________
56)
Dr. Akasofu (Professor Emeritus, University of Alaska) “When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists,” speaking on AGW
______________________________
(57)
James Spann , Meteologist speaking on AGW “It’s pretty rapidly running out of gas and it just seems like every day more and more people [phd scientists] are coming out with the fact that that’s pretty much a hoax.”
______________________________
(58)
Prize-wining Geologist Dr. Ian Plimer, a professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Adelaide in Australia says all the expense will be for nothing, as climate change cannot be stopped—and it isn’t even caused by human-created carbon dioxide.
“There is no relationship between carbon dioxide produced by industry and climate change,” he said.
______________________________
(59)
Chinese scientists Lin Zhen-Shan, and Sun Xian’s 2007 study, published in the peer-reviewed Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, noted that CO2’s impact on warming may be “excessively exaggerated.
______________________________
(60)
Catholic Archbishop of Sydney Cardinal George Pell ridiculed the “semi-religious” belief in global warming and compared fears to “superstition.”
______________________________
(61)
Czech President Vaclav Klaus told a Czech newspaper on February 8, 2007 that fears of catastrophic man-made global warming were a “myth” and critiqued the UN IPCC process, calling it a “political body.”
______________________________
(62)
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was recently reported to have once referred to the Kyoto Protocol as a “socialist scheme” designed to suck money out of rich countries.
______________________________
(63)
Geologist Bruno Wiskel of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic.
______________________________
(64)
An experiment that hints we are wrong on climate change
Nigel Calder, former editor of New Scientist, says the orthodoxy must be challenged
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece
______________________________
(65)
The Media should take a look at this paper and publish it.
Physicist disproves the Green House Hypothesis
http://arxiv.org/ PS_cache/ arxiv/ pdf/ 0707/ 0707.1161v3.pdf
Physicist Gerhard Gerlich disproves the Green House Hypothesis.
http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/06/must-read-bali-climate-declaration-by-scientists/
The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse E ects Within The Frame Of Physics
Version 3.0 (September 9, 2007)
replaces Version 1.0 (July 7, 2007) and later
Gerhard Gerlich
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v3.pdf
______________________________
(66)
The TWO correlations of north pole movements which deviate from the normal circular path.These two deviations were at exactly the same period’s as both extremes of temperature in the 1930’s and around 1998.
______________________________
(67)
32000 Scientists signed the petition project
there are no surveys of scientists supporting the IPCC’s conclusions. All we got are statements from “science academies”, i.e. politicial bodies pretending to represent their whole memberships. And the relevant word here is “pretending”.
______________________________
(68)
Arctic with undersea volcanoes and thousands of black smokers plus huge area with a thin Earth Crust which produces hydrothermal energy.
http://www.john-daly.com/stations/franz-js.gif
Gakkel ridge Pompei size eruptions
Just who is suppressing science and who is distorting science
http://www.livescience.com/environment/080627-sea-volcanoes.html
Volcanoes Erupt Beneath Arctic Ice
The TWO correlations of north pole movements which deviate from the normal circular path.
These two deviations were at exactly the same period’s as both extremes of temperature in the 1930’s and around 1998.
Sharp wriggles in pole track would certainly cause stress to the mantle crust joint’s causing more than usual heat and gas release from millions of undersea hydrothermal vents and hho knows how many undersea volcanoes which is now known to have happened along the Gakkel Ridge “Intense seismic activity began in Gakkel Ridge in January of 1999 and continued for seven months. Gakkel Ridge”
http://www.geosociety.org/news/pr/01-64.htm
Why have we not seen this fact published in the news papers?
Fire Under Arctic Ice: Volcanoes Have Been Blowing Their Tops In The Deep Ocean
http://www.livescience.com/environment/080627-sea-volcanoes.html
Volcanoes Erupt Beneath Arctic Ice
By Jeanna Bryner, Senior Writer
This map of the Arctic Ocean shows the Gakkel Ridge, Nansen Basin, Lomononsov Ridge, and the proposed cruise track of the icebreaker Oden. Credit: Jack Cook/WHOI.
New evidence deep beneath the Arctic ice suggests a series of underwater volcanoes have erupted in violent explosions in the past decade.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/could-volcanoes-be-melting-the-arctic-ice
The eruptions — as big as the one that buried Pompei — took place in 1999 along the Gakkel Ridge, an underwater mountain chain snaking 1,800 kilometres (1,100 miles) from the northern tip of Greenland to Siberia.
Scientists suspected even at the time that a simultaneous series of earthquakes were linked to these volcanic spasms.
Scientists Document Warm Water Surging Into Arctic
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060926171037.htm
———–
There is new evidence for the earth’s core heating based on variations in the earth’s magnetic field. There is about a six year lag for “global warming” correlating with the amount of time required for the heat to conduct through the mantle. A summary article is here:
http://www.gsaaj.org/articles/TempPaperv1n22007.pdf
A new submarine for measuring the temperature of deep oceans found more heat than expected on its first measurement. Deep ocean heat points to the heat coming from the earth’s core. Deep Ocean Heat Measured – (external)
A related point is that expansion of the oceans from heating is twice as much as expected, with no explanation. The best explanation is that the deep oceans are hotter than expected due to heat coming from the earth’s core.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/could-volcanoes-be-melting-the-arctic-ice
The eruptions — as big as the one that buried Pompei — took place in 1999 along the Gakkel Ridge, an underwater mountain chain snaking 1,800 kilometres (1,100 miles) from the northern tip of Greenland to Siberia.
Scientists suspected even at the time that a simultaneous series of earthquakes were linked to these volcanic spasms.
———-
Hydrothermal Vents on Arctic Seafloor
“We have completely unexpected results,” said Charles Langmuir, of Columbia University. “The ocean ridge below the Arctic is completely unique. We found 12 new volcanoes where we expected to find none, and we found unexpected and abundant hydrothermal activity.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1760271.stm
http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=7545&tid=441&cid=48352&ct=61&article=28811
Three volcanic craters they discovered are named Loke, Oden, and Thor.
http://www.awi.de/fileadmin/user_upload/News/Press_Releases/2008/2._Quartal/Map_p.jpg
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/whoi-gds062508.php
Volcanic ashes on the sea bed of Gakkel Ridge
—————
VOLCANIC ACTIVITY melts the Arctic,Under sea
TAKE A LOOK AT WHERE THE ICE IS MELTING AND WHERE THE GAKKEL RIDGE IS.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/15/goddard_arctic_ice_mystery/
————–
Global distribution of seamounts from ship-track bathymetry data
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2007GL029874.shtml
—————
volcanoes on the ocean floor
http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn12218#comForm
quote:
“The programme found 201,055 volcanoes over 100m tall. Previously, satellite data had identified 14,164 volcanoes over 1500 m high.”
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2007GL029874.shtml for subscribers it is GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L13304, doi:10.1029/2007GL029874, 200
AS WELL AS THIS
Global warming not to blame for warmer North Pole
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/15/ocean_currents_melt_planet/
According to a team of NASA scientists, decade-long variations in ocean circulation, known as the Arctic Oscillation, have an effect on the oceans’ salinity. A very salty sea is heavier and circulates differently than a less salty one, the team says. This can affect the temperature of the water in the region and thus the local climate.
The distribution of the decrease, and its implications for the salinity of the water, suggests that the ocean has switched to a clockwise circulation – the same as was dominant before 1990, the team writes.
AND THIS
The Amazing Correlations Of The Position and Motions Of The Pole With Volcanic and Earthquake Activity.
Polar motion is the tectonic engine which creates earthquakes, volcanoes, El Nino, and global warming.
Mandeville also found that the cosmic factors of the EMS (Earth-Moon-Sun) system are creating new changes in the location and motion of the spin axis which are sufficient to force a major new trend in the shape shifting of the Earth’s crust, most especially in the tropical zones. This shape shifting is pulsed in the frequency of the 6.5 year X Wave (spiral waveform of Chandler’s Wobble) and it has directly induced a huge increase (possibly a fourfold increase) in the release of the Earth’s interior heat into the bottoms of the oceans during the past 50 years, most especially in the Pacific. In otherwords, the 6.5 year spiral X Wave is causing El Nino while the progressively accelerating drift or shift in the location of the pole is inducing the release of a steadily increasing amount of heat with each El Nino. This progressive shift is increasing the severity of each cycle while accumulating as the trend which has come to be known as global warming.
Unlike all other theories of Earth dynamics and global change, these truths are non-theoretical, are completely free of fancy mathematical sophistry, are strictly observation driven, and can always be found to be consistant with all of the data.
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/polarmotion/plots/chandler_wobble_plots.htm
—————-
Edgar Cayce claimed in the early 1930’s that when upheavels were apparant in the South Pacific area around 1936, we would know that the equilibrium in the earth had shifted and that the Change in the Earth had commenced. Most strangely, the statement seems as true today for this era’s earth changes as it was true then.
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthchanges/monitor/polarmotion/pm_monitorbackground.htm
_____________________________
(69)
High price for load of hot air
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21920043-27197,00.html
The salient facts are these. First, the accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998. Oddly, this eight-year-long temperature stasis has occurred despite an increase over the same period of 15 parts per million (or 4 per cent) in atmospheric CO2.
Second, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, show little if any global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).
Third, there are strong indications from solar studies that Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades.
Not only do humans not dominate Earth’s current temperature trend but the likelihood is that further large sums of public money are shortly going to be committed to, theoretically, combat warming when cooling is the more likely short-term climatic eventuality.
In one of the more expensive ironies of history, the expenditure of more than $US50 billion ($60 billion) on research into global warming since 1990 has failed to demonstrate any human-caused climate trend, let alone a dangerous one.
Yet that expenditure will pale into insignificance compared with the squandering of money that is going to accompany the introduction of a carbon trading or taxation system.
The costs of thus expiating comfortable middle class angst are, of course, going to be imposed preferentially upon the poor and underprivileged.
* Professor Bob Carter is an environmental scientist at James Cook University who studies ancient climate change
______________________________
(70)
Greenland Melting?
In 1992 a Lockheed P 38 Fighter Plane was recovered in Greenland from under 250 feet of ice having landed there in 1942. Given that it took less than 50 years to build up 250 of ice does this not bring into question the thousand of years the said to be needed to build up the thickness of the existing ice Yours T Gunn
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/6246248.stm
http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=297
http://www.thelostsquadron.com/
______________________________
(71)
Active volcano located beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet
In the south polar region, Mt. Erebus, on Ross Island, is the most active volcano in Antarctica and the world’s southernmost active volcano. A lava lake has been active within the crater for at least several decades. No special activity is occurring at Mount Erebus at the present time. But in 1992, scientists detected currently active volcanoes beneath the Antarctic ice in both in Marie Byrd Land and the Transantarctic Mountains areas.
Surprise! There’s an active volcano under Antarctic ice
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/22/surprise-theres-an-active-volcano-under-antarctic-ice/
The volcano on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet began erupting some 2,000 years ago and remains active to this day. Using airborne ice-sounding radar, scientists discovered a layer of ash produced by a ’subglacial’ volcano. It extends across an area larger than Wales. The volcano is located beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet in the Hudson Mountains at latitude 74.6°South, longitude 97°West.
First Evidence Of Under-ice Volcanic Eruption In Antarctica
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm
______________________________
(72)
Read the sunspots
The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change – and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling.
R. Timothy Patterson is professor and director of the Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University.
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=597d0677-2a05-47b4-b34f-b84068db11f4&p=4
______________________________
(73)
Climate Extremes
Extreme Temperatures – Where’s the Global Warming?
Record high and record low temperatures
http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2007/02/extreme-temperatures-wheres-global.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/289/5487/2068
1994 – 9
1995 – 5
1996 – 4
1997 – 3
1998 – 19
1999 – 4
2000 – 17
2001 – 0
2002 – 1
2003 – 0
2004 – 0
2005 – 0
2006 – 1
Total for 13 years is 62.
Compare this to 1929 – 1941:
1929 – 7
1930 – 16
1931 – 8
1932 – 10
1933 – 6
1934 – 25
1935 – 1
1936 – 29
1937 – 2
1938 – 8
1939 – 12
1940 – 4
1941 – 8
The total for 13 years is 136.
The basic tenet of those who say that we are experiencing anthropogenic CO2 driven global warming is the frequent occurrence of new temperature extremes. This analysis is a high-level “test” of that hypothesis.
Anthropogenic CO2 driven global warming means more frequent occurrences of temperature extremes.
Increased Record High Temperatures
Is that a true or false?
Here’s a graph of 50-state record highs for the last 110 years:
http://bp0.blogger.com/_b5jZxTCSlm0/R5yRPjfAIQI/AA...
______________________________
(74)
A recent study conducted by B. M. Vinther, K. K. Andersen, P. D. Jones, K. R. Briffa2 and J. Cappelen of the Climate Research Unit in the UK and published in Journal of Geophysical Research (1) shows Greenland has not warmed. In fact Greenland has cooled by 1.3 degrees Celsius since 1950.
______________________________
(75)
Of anthropogenic CO2 from the atmosphere a year, humans only add 1% as much CO2 to the atmosphere per year as already in it. If such a miniscule amount were as critical as propagandists claim, all life would have been destroyed long ago. Nature hasn’t been sitting on a 1% knife edge for millions of years.
Reference:
Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine
______________________________
(76)
With the vast amount of reliable information accusing the UN-IPCC,Governments and Scientists involved in obviously corrupt schemes and the media ignoring the fact I fear where our future may heading especially now we are 99 percent certain”unequivocally”sure the climate is heading into a mini-ice age and it will be unprepared for costing unimaginable hardship and lives.
All this effort and trillions to slash a harmless and beneficial level of carbon Dioxide all on the word of a corrupt UN-IPCC.and their;
>>>”Disturbing corruption of the peer-review process”<<>>>Scientists of the IPCC may be involved in carbon trading, but they also benefit through a high profile, easier access to funding and easier promotion.<<<<
All the relationships between Gore, Strong, and carbon credit trading are well documented here; http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1185475433.pdf
______________________________
(80)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X (EMPHASIS ADDED ON THIS LINK)(EMPHASIS ADDED ON THIS LINK)
X
X Co2 is proven harmless. Check Monckton at SPPI.Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a harmless, inert gas and would be benificial to plant life.
X APS member, Roger W. Cohen, and is in support of Lord Monckton’s paper published in theJuly APS newsletter:
X
X Roy Spencer’s testimony before congress backs up Monckton’s assertions on climate sensitivity
X http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=Qzf6z-oHP8U
FROM HERE; http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/07/22/roy-spencers-testimony-before-congress-backs-up-moncktons-assertions-on-climate-sensitivity/
X (EMPHASIS ADDED ON THIS LINK)(EMPHASIS ADDED ON THIS LINK)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
______________________________
(81)
Håkan Grudd
(1) Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Received: 28 June 2007 Accepted: 15 December 2007 Published online: 30 January 2008
Abstract This paper presents updated tree-ring width (TRW) and maximum density (MXD) from Torneträsk in northern Sweden, now covering the period ad 500–2004. By including data from relatively young trees for the most recent period, a previously noted decline in recent MXD is eliminated. Non-climatological growth trends in the data are removed using Regional Curve Standardization (RCS), thus producing TRW and MXD chronologies with preserved low-frequency variability. The chronologies are calibrated using local and regional instrumental climate records. A bootstrapped response function analysis using regional climate data shows that tree growth is forced by April–August temperatures and that the regression weights for MXD are much stronger than for TRW. The robustness of the reconstruction equation is verified by independent temperature data and shows that 63–64% of the instrumental inter-annual variation is captured by the tree-ring data. This is a significant improvement compared to previously published reconstructions based on tree-ring data from Torneträsk. A divergence phenomenon around ad 1800, expressed as an increase in TRW that is not paralleled by temperature and MXD, is most likely an effect of major changes in the density of the pine population at this northern tree-line site. The bias introduced by this TRW phenomenon is assessed by producing a summer temperature reconstruction based on MXD exclusively. The new data show generally higher temperature estimates than previous reconstructions based on Torneträsk tree-ring data. The late-twentieth century, however, is not exceptionally warm in the new record: On decadal-to-centennial timescales, periods around ad 750, 1000, 1400, and 1750 were equally warm, or warmer. The 200-year long warm period centered on ad 1000 was significantly warmer than the late-twentieth century (p < 0.05) and is supported by other local and regional paleoclimate data. The new tree-ring evidence from Torneträsk suggests that this “Medieval Warm Period” in northern Fennoscandia was much warmer than previously recognized.
______________________________
(82)
Lake Baikal study shows 20th century was certainly nothing out of the ordinary
Questioning 20th Century Warmth
http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html
______________________________
(83)
“The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change – and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling.”
R. Timothy Patterson is professor and director of the Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University.
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=597d0677-2a05-47b4-b34f-b84068db11f4&p=4
______________________________
(84)
Read the sunspots
The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change – and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling
http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2008/01/global-wa...
That reveals:
A 70 year cycle is suggested from 1895-1975 — note the similarity between 1975-2005 and 1895-1925 (this also suggest another possible peak in a decade, then another long decline for the next 30 years).
______________________________
(85)
The hottest decade of the 20th century was in the 1930s NOT 1990s.
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/Hottest%20Day.jpg
______________________________
(86)
Dr Roy Spencer recently spoke at the NY conference, and said the natural CO2 fluences are 24000 times the anthropogenic contribution, indeed, termites’ are 20 times.
______________________________
(87)
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
______________________________
(88)
Army Chief Scientist: “Sun’s turbulent dynamics” driving climate
http://www.fel.duke.edu/~scafetta/pdf/opinion0308.pdf
Dr. Bruce West, A U.S Army Chief Scientist, Says Sun, Not Man, Is Driving Climate Change – June 3, 2008
http://wwwstayalive.blogspot.com/2008/12/global-warming-fraud.html
“It’s practically a slam dunk that we are in for about 30 years of global cooling
http://www.iceagenow.com/Practically_a_slam_dunk.htm
______________________________
(89)
Flashback: New scientific analysis shows Sun “could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth’s average temperature”?????????????????
____________________________
(90)
An examination of warming and cooling trends over the last 400 years shows an “almost exact correlation” between all of the known climate changes that have occurred and solar energy transmitted to the Earth, while showing “no correlation at all with CO2,” Don J. Easterbrook, a geologist with Western Washington University in Bellingham, Wash., told CNSNews.com.
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=35857
______________________________
(91)
The IPCC violated 72 scientific principles of forecasting
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/28/forecasting-guru-announces-no-scientific-basis-for-forecasting-climate/
Yet another scientist has come forward with a press release saying that not only did their audit of IPCC forecasting procedures and found that they “violated 72 scientific principles of forecasting”, but that “The models were not intended as forecasting models and they have not been validated for that purpose.”
______________________________
(92)
http://www.livescience.com/php/trivia/earthfacts/
El Azizia in Libya recorded a temperature of 136 degrees Fahrenheit (57.8 Celsius) on Sept. 13, 1922 — the hottest ever measured. In Death Valley, it got up to 134 Fahrenheit on July 10, 1913.
Far and away, the coldest temperature ever measured on Earth was -129 Fahrenheit (-89 Celsius) at Vostok , Antarctica, on July 21, 1983.
______________________________
(93)
Urban Heat Island effect-proof it’s not small
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_b5jZxTCSlm0/SU_gTM-6n7I/AAAAAAAACWQ/5uJwqXBwMu4/s1600-h/12-22-08+Michigan+Hot+Spot.JPG
_____________________________
(94)
There Is No Correlation Between CO2and Climate Change
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/
______________________________
(95)
“Over 400 Prominent Scientists (and rapidly growing) Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007”
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=37AE6E96-802A-23AD-4C8A-EDF6D8150789
______________________________
(96)
Warming On Jupiter, Mars, Pluto, Neptune’s Moon & Earth Linked to Increased Solar Activity, Scientists Say
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=469DD8F9-802A-23AD-4459-CC5C23C24651
______________________________
(97)
Top UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Turns on IPCC. Calls Warming Fears: ‘Worst scientific scandal in the history’
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=1461
______________________________
(98)
Scientific Facts Prove Human Activity Has Not Caused Global Warming
A well know astrophysicist, Nir Shariv, one of Israel’s top young scientists, in the following report renounces his previous position that human activity has caused global warming. He now claims that human activity may actually be contributing a cooling effect, not warming.
_____________________________
(99)
Only 34% Now Blame Humans for Global Warming
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/environment/energy_update
______________________________
(100)
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Gerlich, Gerhard; Tscheuschner, Ralf D.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1161
______________________________
(101)
STOP THIS CO2 MADNESS!
http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=439&Itemid=1
CO2 represents just 0.038% of the Earth’s atmosphere
Kathryn McCallum is my real name. Most Peculiar Mama and Chugg, who are you really?
If these are your views, why are you reading Crikey?