Nourishing the environmental debate

The top three climate pitfalls for the Opposition to avoid

   

Renewable energy consultant Dan Cass writes:

I have watched the major political parties filibuster their way through climate policy ever since the UNFCCC was formed, in 1991. All though his rein, Prime Minister John Howard got away with green-bashing, greenwash and inaction, but the times have changed.

If the Liberal-National Coalition wants to be relevant, then it will have to work much harder at ecological politics than it did when it was in power.

Tony Abbot, MHR and Senators Minchin and Joyce have to understand that being ecologically illiterate is a political liability in the twenty-first century, as it should be.

The key game-changer is obviously the rise of the Greens and the adoption of climate concern across the rest of the political spectrum. But there are also more subtle shifts that the Coalition would be advised to grasp.

Here is my Top Three Avoidable Pitfalls for an ambitious Opposition in the era of climate change:

  1. Underestimating the climate movement
    Australian Prime Ministers are used to dealing with a small corps of key environmental groups and commentators: the Australian Conservation Foundation, WWF, Tim Flannery etc. It would be a grave mistake to think that these few groups or individuals are still able to award the big green publicity medals.
  2. Every month that goes by, a new climate action group starts in Australia. This under-reported sector is reinventing the environmental movement. It wields the moral authority and is rapidly building an organisational capacity.

  3. Patronising the media
    PM John Howard got away with speaking ecological bunkum to the Canberra Press Gallery because so few reporters took environmental issues seriously. This changed in the wake of the Stern Report and Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth.
  4. Over the past two years, a corps of influential journalists have become climate experts. Young journalists coming up through the ranks are even more environmentally literate and motivated.

  5. Shunning green business
    New energy firms are billion dollar enterprises and old corporations are greening their production. The current air-freighted issue of Harvard Business Review has green business on the cover and says it is way out of the global recession.

The Coalition partners can retain their reputation as parties of business only if they support the interests of the emerging green economy. Already, in the USA, the Chamber of Commerce is splitting over its allegiance to fossil fuel firms at the expense of the rising green businesses.

5 Comments

  1. 1
    Frank Campbell
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    This is lightweight waffle.

    A waste of Crikeyspace.

  2. 2
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    We’re not waving we’re drowning. Avaarz have started building the Ark in Washington DC.

    There won’t be room for Abbott and Minchin.

  3. 3
    kdkd
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    Frank,

    Your attitude seems rather negative through all of your posts across this forum. If you have something positive to say why don’t you try explaining yourself in a way that doesn’t make you come across in such a nihilistic way.

  4. 4
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Kevin – did you like the Greenpeace ark in Turkey in ’07 ?

    See http://bit.ly/6D91Iw

    Thanks kdkd, but I think should ignore the skeptics and the ragers. They never listen or show respect. There is only so much time and the clock is TckTckTck-ing; your time is valuable!

  5. 5
    kdkd
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Dan

    Apparently one of my roles as an activist is to expose the so called skeptical position as wanting.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.