<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ashes 09: A hole in the Hauritz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/sports/2009/07/03/ashes-09-a-hole-in-the-hauritz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/sports/2009/07/03/ashes-09-a-hole-in-the-hauritz/</link>
	<description>Our balls and all sports blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:48:25 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daveliberts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/sports/2009/07/03/ashes-09-a-hole-in-the-hauritz/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>daveliberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/chappell/?p=869#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Can only agree with this assessment. Michael Clarke should be good for a spell of his left arm orthodox if the pitches demand this, likewise there are a few other trundlers who are primarily in the team for their batting ability, so why waste a spot on Hauritz when he&#039;s lacking the form? Stuey Clark was bowling a tight line last night so if containment is what&#039;s needed, he&#039;s definitely the better bet. Johnson and Lee were less conservative but looked like potential wicket-takers and should be in the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can only agree with this assessment. Michael Clarke should be good for a spell of his left arm orthodox if the pitches demand this, likewise there are a few other trundlers who are primarily in the team for their batting ability, so why waste a spot on Hauritz when he&#8217;s lacking the form? Stuey Clark was bowling a tight line last night so if containment is what&#8217;s needed, he&#8217;s definitely the better bet. Johnson and Lee were less conservative but looked like potential wicket-takers and should be in the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
