tip off
12

North Melbourne Football Club is a more viable business than The Age

bigfootyCrikey Sports has the pleasure of having a guest post by Jamie Johnstone, a blogger at BigFooty, Australia’s largest and most popular AFL internet forum. This post was first published at BigFooty.


BigFooty’s Jamie Johnstone writes:

As a lifelong Melburnian, I’ve always had two great constants in my life. My footy club North Melbourne and The Age.

So it is that I feel a great disappointment to see one of them on its last legs; losing money hand over fist, struggling to make it through week to week, cutting staff, trying to dress up a shiny new facility as genuine structural success … a slow decay.

Lucky my footy team is doing alright then.

The Age, one of the flagships of Australian non-Murdoch media, is in serious trouble. You have to start asking the hard questions: how long can it keep up the charade, how long the old girl can keep fronting up? How long before the powers that be — some would say inevitably — call time on a once magnificent institution? And when push comes to shove, who should be blamed for this terminal decline?

The Age ran a story inaccurate and agenda-driven — about the finances of the North Melbourne Football Club yesterday.

It is a shame that The Age didn’t observe the most basic tenet of journalism and check its story with the target.

As the NMFC has demonstrated, many of the claims in The Age story are simply wrong. Others are deliberately skewed, taken out of context, figures massaged. To suit an agenda.

For a long time, it was just chip on the shoulder North fans like me who claimed that Football’s First Lady, The Age’s football editor, Caroline Wilson nursed a grudge against our club.

We don’t need to run through the litany of anti-North articles by Wilson over the last five years. The fact is that many in the media and footy world now see our view is correct.

Wilson’s Channel Nine colleagues Garry Lyon and Craig Hutchison have repeatedly called her to account over her anti-North bias. Her peers recognise the simple fact that Wilson has been running an anti-North agenda for a while now, one that has led her to practise poor journalism in pursuit of her agenda.

Earlier this week, Football’s First Lady herself made an intriguing observation midway through a trademark hit piece on North President James Brayshaw.

“Brayshaw won’t like this and, while his inner sanctum of North and media buddies will accuse this columnist of being obsessively anti-North Melbourne, that will not help the Kangaroos any more than he has lately.”

Note the lack of denial from Wilson. Other journalists, recognising that there’s a view afoot that their integrity is being called into question, would issue a robust denial. A vehement denial. The good journalist is independent, independent, independent.

Yet Wilson acknowledges the claims against her and continues apace. The reasonable reader can only assume that she is comfortable with the view that she’s obsessively anti-North Melbourne. Or even just plain old anti-North. Whatever happened to journalistic integrity?

Let’s cut to the chase then. The Age, via its Chief Football Writer, is convinced North is not going to make it.

Me, I reckon The Age is in deep shit itself.

In fact, in a good old fashioned Deathmatch, I’m willing to bet that the North Melbourne Football Club will outlive The Age in its current form.

That is, The Age will go under before North does.

Let’s have a look at the evidence. North’s financial situation is well known. You can look at the figures in the link above. Its not great but it is not as bad as some make out. And it’s certainly better than The Age’s.

Like papers all around the Western world, The Age is losing readers and crucially, advertisers, to the online world. North is part of the biggest sporting competition in the country, one that is about to sign a $1bn TV rights deal. The equation is simple — The Age is in a dying industry, North in a growing field.

It is telling that Wilson’s attack on North came on the same day that Borders went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The Age and its parent company Fairfax have a great deal in common with Borders: they’re both dead tree industries being rapidly devoured by the cheaper, nimbler and simply more attractive options available on the Internet.

The Age’s coverage of North Melbourne’s financial affairs sneers at the fact that North has recorded regular operating profits, saying that the underlying financial position makes them mere window dressing and unsustainable.

Yet a quick squiz at Fairfax’s own situation reveals a very similar situation: the ailing organisation has only just returned to profit but industry insiders remain unconvinced the company has what it takes it in the medium let alone long term.

You can’t blame them when there’s very strong suggestions that The Age has been fudging the figures on its circulation. The Age has cut so many staff in recent years it is a shadow of its former self. The lesson internationally is that cutting down on editorial staff to cut costs is self-defeating and leads to a vicious circle. Fewer editorial staff leads to a thinner product leads to a less attractive product leads to reader disenchantment leads to fewer readers leads to lower circulation and dropping ad revenue and bang, you’re back where you started.

The takeaway, as my colleagues in the corporate world would say is simple: North has a minimum of five years — the length of the impending TV rights deal — to get its house in order. But the reality is that interstate clubs take decades to achieve stability, if at all. That Andrew Demetriou today identified Port and Brisbane as being of major concern to the league is telling. Gold Coast and most pertinently GWS are going to need decades of nurturing.

To provide the steady revenue stream to allow that mothering, the AFL needs an 18 team competition. After the Fitzroy experience, it knows that it cannot bully Melbourne sides into mergers or relocations. On that alone, North is on safe structural ground. Add to that the fact that North has an exciting young coach and list, a stable long term sponsor and now a naming rights partner for Aegis Park and the future is far better than the interested parties at Spencer Street would have you believe.

And to Spencer Street we must now turn our attention. Like North, The Age recently invested in a shiny new facility. Yet all the evidence tells us that the building will soon stand only as a monument to the passing of daily broadsheet newspaper journalism in this city. The Age is backed into a financial corner and being pummelled by market and social forces it cannot hope to control.

In five years time, North will still be playing in the Australian Football League, one of 18 clubs in a league that will have signed a new blockbuster TV rights deal. Yes, it will probably have the lowest membership and attendances of any Melbourne club, but then, there’s always going to be someone at the bottom of the table. Its highly likely North will be playing some home games in Tasmania or Ballarat. But its home base will be at Aegis Park on Arden Street. It will be called North Melbourne.

The Age? My bet is The Age will have gone entirely online by 2016. It will have cut its staff even further. It will source all its foreign news from wire services and overseas outlets like The Guardian and Washington Post. Wire copy topped and tailed by subs will be passed off as local news. There’ll be even more ad-driven copy, advertorials desperately masquerading as “features” or “lifestyle”. It will be a skeleton of its former self, a victim of its own hubris.

Melburnians, especially at this time of year, are more likely to turn to the back page of the paper first as the front. Readers don’t want to be embroiled in one woman’s bizarre personal crusade. They want timely, accurate reporting and informed and insightful comment.

Not endless vendettas that rely on fudged figures and spurious claims. Caroline Wilson and The Age have declared war on North Melbourne. They aren’t the first do that and they won’t be the last. We’ll see who gets the last laugh on this one but the evidence, both historical and contemporaneous suggests it won’t be the scribes from Spencer Street.

AFL
10

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    John Flanagan
    Posted February 18, 2011 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Jamie

    Thank you sincerely for this insightful and warming piece of work. Like many other North Melbourne people, I have been incensed by the Fairfax behaviour of recent days but of course I have little if any recourse.

    Fairfax publishes only minimal critical feedback on its website, so it ignored my two comments earlier this week. In this same vein, its response to the criticism levelled at it by the NMFC still fails to concede fundamental errors in its initial article and response.

    I pondered these circumstances just this morning. Nice life, I thought. Print what you like, push personal agendas, distort the facts and ignore critical feedback.

    Wilson & her underlings are a long, long way from a class act. The interesting thing is that she rarely writes anything from a positive perspective. It’s all about doom & gloom and pointing out other’s failures (unless it’s about Richmond of course)

    Then there is Jeff Kennett. What a parrot! But that is another story.

    Thanks again for your great article.

  • 2
    Big Vern
    Posted February 18, 2011 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Jamie. Top work fella.

    I’ve often wondered if my perception of Caroline Wilson’s anti-North bias was a product of my own pro-North bias, but apparently I’m not alone. …& now she’s got her minions out to impress the boss.

    The Age’s inevitable move to cyberspace will likely result in the same as a North move to the Gold Coast – it may survive, but not as the proud institution it once was.

    Go Kangas!!

  • 3
    jules
    Posted February 20, 2011 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Nice one Jamie. I live in the bush in Northern NSW and avoid the trad media wherever possible. Its impossible not to hear some things tho. Even abc tv this morning banging on about it. Thanks for this. It helps to have someone sum stuff up.

    Go Kangas.

  • 4
    DiscoStu
    Posted February 20, 2011 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    ”My footy club is in major strife so let’s have a crack at anyone who points it out”
    What a load of dross. If my memory serves me right, the story quoted the official club auditor, who reckons North can’t pay its bills without AFL handouts.
    That’s extra money from AFL coffers to help balance the books. Money clubs that actually make a profit don;t get.
    Eugene and his team run around patting themselves on the back for making a ‘profit’.
    The club has FAILED to deliver matches in Ballarat or Tassie. The AUDITOR says it needs this to SURVIVE.
    Where’s the auditors report in this cr*pola? Does Fairfax have more than $2500 in the bank? Who gives Fairfax money at the end of each year to balance the books.
    When North spruiked a profit in the off season, did they tell everyone they ran up an OVERDRAFT doing it?
    I think not. I would have thought real North fans would worry about this stuff and ask the club, rather than have a crack a paper.
    Also, I love the fact you’ve gone off crying about some kind of Age vendetta to Crikey, which actually has a vendetta against the Age!
    So people report you’ve got no money? Sooky sooky la la.

  • 5
    Posted February 20, 2011 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    Jamie, I am not a North supporter, but I agree with you and I will go one better – I predict that North will also outlive the Herald-Sun and The Australian in their current paper form.

  • 6
    Quizzical
    Posted February 22, 2011 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    I’m with Stu on this one – as tabled to date.
    It is the old defence that “he was speeding too so I shouldn’t be booked”.

    Footy has for too many years been based on rhetoric, anecdote, and ‘team spirit’ a la the shinboners. It is now big business and needs to be managed accordingly.

    Jamie, facts and data beat rhetoric any day. The best way to shaft Madame Age and convince people like me reading this blog is to trot out say 5 years key financial numbers for the NMFC. In the cold hard light of day it is the financial trend based on the key numbers that allows an assessment of solvency.

  • 7
    Michelle
    Posted February 22, 2011 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I think you will find that Caroline Wilson doesn’t flinch at the attempts of the disgruntled, the sad, those in denial and those who are just straight out chauvinistic pigs because she is used to it! I would not say by any means that Gary Lyons and Craig (what happened to my hair) Hutchison. The Latter behaves like a spoiled brat in front of her, probably because he will never amount to much, while Gary (too much hair)Lyons cuts her off and is just downright rude.
    While all the other sports “journos” are sucking up to each other telling each other what bloody good blokes they are and making excuses for poor each others performances both on and off the field, at least she cuts to the chase and asks the probing ones and ignores all the ignorant BS going on around her.
    I don’t think she has a problem with North Melbourne, I think North Melbourne has a problem with North Melbourne. Win a premiership and this article will have a bit more merit.

  • 8
    Thomas
    Posted March 21, 2011 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    What is Caroline’s agenda for writing the constant North bashing articles. Does she not want the club to every be successful? Does she want the AFL to take away their license? Does she have a personal hatred towards James Brayshaw or Eugene Arocca?

    I agree with the blog on the theme it doesn’t make sense to keep writing the same article – especially in football unless you are going to say why you are writing it.

    Labelling North Melbourne as cash-strapped, basket-cases does not in anyway promote the AFL code or the North Melbourne Football Club.

    It is not the journalists responsibility to always promote something positively – they are there to be the voice of the opinion / challenge the power – so unless she is going to say why she is constantly whacking North then her tirade is becoming ridiculous.

    As for the argument North couldn’t live without handouts, that is the AFL’s way of making sure they are running an even based competition.

    Corperate/Sponsorship is now the number 1 source for AFL clubs ahead of membership in terms of profit. The AFL fixture North Melbourne to the b-grade venues all the time (Launceston, Skilled Stadium etc). which, significantly decreases there opportunities to maximise their corporate packages – and, would also devalue their memebership.

    My point being – if the AFL want to run a fair competition then Collingwood would have to go to Skilled Stadium to play Geelong – therefore a neutral away game at the MCG becomes a much harder task at Skilled Stadium. * We know this will never happen, and it should never happen because from a buisness perspective the AFL are never going to put a 75,000 potential crowd and make them play at Skilled Stadium and hold 30,000. However, it is there responsability to make sure that everyone in some way or another is recieving compensation for this fixturing bias.

    It effects; on field results, off field membership, off field corporate opportunities etc.

  • 9
    Mark Duffett
    Posted March 23, 2011 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    What, still no Crikey AFL tipping competition? Disappointing!

  • 10
    Mikel Mraz
    Posted August 22, 2011 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    That doesn’t sound right. Football club more profitable?

2 Trackbacks

  1. ...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mr Onthemoon, Robbo. Robbo said: RT @firstdogonmoon: do you sport? http://arseh.at/4c3 [...

  2. ...] excellent blog by Jamie Johnstone sums up my feelings about my once beloved Melbourne [...

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...