<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What should be done about those deported to danger/death?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/11/20/what-should-be-done-about-those-deported-to-dangerdeath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/11/20/what-should-be-done-about-those-deported-to-dangerdeath/</link>
	<description>The world of politics, policy and public life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:09:14 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/11/20/what-should-be-done-about-those-deported-to-dangerdeath/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>beevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/bartlett/?p=172#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Yes I  was very saddened by the story. But what was behind this Law (and political pressure you mention) which had such bi-partisan support? I am confused as to why Australian policy is so tough on asylum seekers. I don&#039;t remember giving any kind of electoral support for anything like this. Is it all part of the post 9/11 paranoia or what?? Is anybody saying things were handled this way as a direct implementation of clear policy or is it just bungling plain and simple?
I really want to know in plain terms where it is written (ie law) that these people must be treated like this and then I want to know how we can reverse it as soon as possible. Is it bad laws by their nature or just poorly cobbled together without a full understanding of this type of consequence? What is the &quot;political motivation&quot; you mention? Can we be clearer on this, because if there is some lobby group behind it or some way this is meant to win votes then I need to underestand it better. I honestly want to know how we can fix this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I  was very saddened by the story. But what was behind this Law (and political pressure you mention) which had such bi-partisan support? I am confused as to why Australian policy is so tough on asylum seekers. I don&#8217;t remember giving any kind of electoral support for anything like this. Is it all part of the post 9/11 paranoia or what?? Is anybody saying things were handled this way as a direct implementation of clear policy or is it just bungling plain and simple?<br />
I really want to know in plain terms where it is written (ie law) that these people must be treated like this and then I want to know how we can reverse it as soon as possible. Is it bad laws by their nature or just poorly cobbled together without a full understanding of this type of consequence? What is the &#8220;political motivation&#8221; you mention? Can we be clearer on this, because if there is some lobby group behind it or some way this is meant to win votes then I need to underestand it better. I honestly want to know how we can fix this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
