<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Australia capable of a serious debate on a Bill of Rights, or are we stuck with another round of crap speak?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/12/04/is-australia-capable-of-a-serious-debate-on-a-bill-of-rights-or-are-we-stuck-with-another-round-of-crap-speak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/12/04/is-australia-capable-of-a-serious-debate-on-a-bill-of-rights-or-are-we-stuck-with-another-round-of-crap-speak/</link>
	<description>The world of politics, policy and public life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:42:30 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danu Poyner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/12/04/is-australia-capable-of-a-serious-debate-on-a-bill-of-rights-or-are-we-stuck-with-another-round-of-crap-speak/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Danu Poyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/bartlett/?p=198#comment-349</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m sure it&#039;s no doubt enjoyable to not be stuck in a front row seat while people knowingly talk utter bullshit, it scares me that there are not nearly enough people in the Senate with an inquiring mind and an objective viewpoint.

We miss you Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s no doubt enjoyable to not be stuck in a front row seat while people knowingly talk utter bullshit, it scares me that there are not nearly enough people in the Senate with an inquiring mind and an objective viewpoint.</p>
<p>We miss you Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/12/04/is-australia-capable-of-a-serious-debate-on-a-bill-of-rights-or-are-we-stuck-with-another-round-of-crap-speak/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>beevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/bartlett/?p=198#comment-348</guid>
		<description>PS unrelated but... is anyone else finding these comment replies get scrambled at first loading with some jumbled/overlaid words etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS unrelated but&#8230; is anyone else finding these comment replies get scrambled at first loading with some jumbled/overlaid words etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2008/12/04/is-australia-capable-of-a-serious-debate-on-a-bill-of-rights-or-are-we-stuck-with-another-round-of-crap-speak/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>beevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/bartlett/?p=198#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Now, see this is what i dislike about politics today. It looks to me like MT is against it just because the Government is for it! I am not commited either way at the moment on this issue and am certainly not a great supporter of the current government but I am really annoyed at the whole tennis match approach to politics that we see in both houses. IF a thing is good then it is good. To berate it for the sake of political debate is irresponsible and ego serving and risks the public missing out on something which may be a benefit. It would be refreshing if Mr T said &quot;Great Idea KR&quot;... assuming it really is of course. As you say AB, don&#039;t they make the laws the judges have to enforce?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, see this is what i dislike about politics today. It looks to me like MT is against it just because the Government is for it! I am not commited either way at the moment on this issue and am certainly not a great supporter of the current government but I am really annoyed at the whole tennis match approach to politics that we see in both houses. IF a thing is good then it is good. To berate it for the sake of political debate is irresponsible and ego serving and risks the public missing out on something which may be a benefit. It would be refreshing if Mr T said &#8220;Great Idea KR&#8221;&#8230; assuming it really is of course. As you say AB, don&#8217;t they make the laws the judges have to enforce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
