Mubarak finally takes the hint, steps aside for the Army
Having surprised not merely the Obama Administration but apparently members of his own party and the Egyptian military with his defiant decision to stay on on Thursday night, Hosni Mubarak on Friday evening Egyptian time finally gave into 18 days of protests and resigned, handing power to the Army.
This overturned his Thursday evening concession of power to his vice-president Omar Suleiman, who delivered the short, almost tweet-length statement revealing Mubarak’s departure
In the name of Allah the most gracious, the most merciful. My fellow citizens, in the difficult circumstances our country is experiencing, President Muhammad Hosni Mubarak has decided to give up the office of the president of the republic and instructed the supreme council of the armed forces to manage the affairs of the country. May God guide our steps.
After the enormous anti-climax of Thursday evening, when Mubarak provoked fury from the millions of Egyptians now in the streets across the country with a near-delusional speech asserting he would remain in office, Suleiman’s statement prompted wild celebrations among protesters. After 18 days of demonstrations, clashes with security forces, assaults from pro-Mubarak supporters and a sluggish, almost indifferent response from many Western governments, they had achieved their goal of ousting the man whose 30-year dictatorship has exacted a heavy toll in bloodshed, repression and missed economic opportunities.
As Friday’s protests gathered even greater momentum from his non-resignation, Mubarak flew to the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, which as The Guardian nicely pointed out, had on occasion been lent by Mubarak to another discredited American ally, Tony Blair. As it turned out, the dictator was fleeing his capital, one to which he’s unlikely ever to return except, perhaps, as a defendant.
Once the celebrations fade, attention will turn to ensuring that the Egyptian military makes good on its promises made during Friday, when it told protesters it would ensure Mubarak kept his promises of constitutional change, an eventual end to the long-standing state of emergency, and free and fair elections.
The military has taken a stronger role in recent days in detaining, beating and torturing protesters and journalists, casting doubt on its commitment to the sorts of freedoms protesters have repeatedly called for. Nonetheless, as Mohamed El Baradei’s call for intervention by the military yesterday suggested, there were few alternatives for prising Mubarak from office. Omar Suleiman, Egypt’s former spy chief and a known torturer and murderer, was an integral part of the Mubarak regime, one of the reasons both Israel and the United States appeared anxious for Mubarak to position Suleiman as his replacement.
For the moment, however, Egyptians are celebrating a moment many thought would never happen in their lifetimes.










Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.
And US Intelligence is cool (ish) about the Muslim Brotherhood.
US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said during a House Intelligence Committee hearing Thursday that Egypt’s branch of the Muslim Brotherhood movement was “a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried al-Qaeda as a perversion of Islam.”
Clapper, who heads the organization commanding 16 American intelligence and investigation agencies, told the committee that the Muslim Brotherhood “have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera….. There is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally.”
Clapper said that the group fills a vacuum caused by the absence of government services, but added, “It is not necessarily with a view to promoting violence or overthrow of the state.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4027076,00.html
This is despite the hysterical rantings of Fox news.
There’s a nice take-down of Beck and other right-wing wackos at the LA Times (ironically in their ‘entertainment’ section) –
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-onthemedia-20110212,0,7125172.column
Presumably Angra thinks, like Clapper, that the The Muslim Brotherhood is neither?
Clapper is a clown.
The US’ primary intelligence officer wasn’t aware of a major terror plot bust in England a day after multiple arrests in the UK 2 months ago.
He’s ineffectual….. just like Janet Incompetano, Leon Panetta, Hilary Clinton and the rest of Obama’s utterly dreadful administration in dealing with the threat of Islamic jihadis.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/10/administration-corrects-dni-clapper-claim-muslim-brotherhood-secular/
Wow – thank you JamesK. I think we have a certified Bushite in our midst! This is an historic occasion.
Maybe you want to suck up to Sarah Palin too?
I’s suggest a new career looking after the mentally disadvantaged.
Not even even a single argument supporting a rational critique but ad hominem sliming aplenty…….I see Angra demonstrating nothing more than typically inane leftist mouth-foaming hate-filled irrationality.
I doubt Angra’s head-spinning vacuous animosity could reason even some of the possible ramifications of what is transpiring in Egypt, let alone the evil of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic jihad:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/07/why_we_cant_rule_out_an_egyptian_reign_of_terror
Free elections in the Middle East are rather of a problem for the west as parties hostile to western interests usually do very well in such contests. Hamas won an election for the Palestinian Parliament in 2006 and now is classified as a terrorist organisation.How often are we reminded that Hamas got in power by winning an election??
Most pro-west governments in the region are authoritarian clones of Murbarak’s Egypt, so it doesn’t take much to guess what the leanings of democratically elected governments would be.
I do hope Egypt does become democratic, but sadly probably in six months’ time it will be an Army ruled authoritarian state. Such an outcome is likely as it will reflect both western interests and that of the Israelis.
You could actually try reading what they say themselves.
“We are mindful, however, as a nonviolent Islamic movement subjected to six decades of repression, that patent falsehoods, fear mongering and propaganda have been concocted against us in Mubarak’s palaces the past 30 years and by some of his patrons in Washington.
Contrary to fear-mongering reports, the West and the Muslim Brotherhood are not enemies. It is a false dichotomy to posit, as some alarmists are suggesting, that Egypt’s choices are either the status quo of the Mubarak regime or a takeover by “Islamic extremists.”
Looking forward, the Brotherhood is just one group among a diverse array of growing political factions and trends in Egypt, soon to compete with mutual respect in fair and free elections. We have participated in the “political process” such as it was under Mubarak’s dictatorship. In the decades of his rule, we have embraced diversity and democratic values. In keeping with Egypt’s pluralistic society, we have demonstrated moderation in our agenda and have responsibly carried out our duties to our electoral base and Egyptians at large. ”
http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=27998
Also the Foreign Policy magazine you link to is owned by the Washington Post, widely regarded as an outlet for promoting neo-con and anti-liberal ideas.
JamesK – you parrot almost word-for-word Ackermans comments in today’s Telegraph.
He also says Clapper is an idiot and issues dire warnings about “the shadowy, terrorist-supporting jihadist group Muslim Brotherhood”.
After a grand tour around all that is wrong with lefties and greenies and why Wikileaks is so bad he concludes “Our homegrown Green-Left revolutionaries, suffering on their bounty of welfare payments and student loans, may feel solidarity with the striving masses, but they should know better than to bite the philosophy that feeds them.”
Is your first name Piers by any chance?
The right has problems with believing that Egypt (and Tunisia) are broad based uprising of people demanding freedom and fair elections, remember, George Bush said in his statement to congress in September 2001:
This became the justification for Afghanistan and Iraq, after WMD was found to be nonexistent.
If this isn’t true then there is no justification at all for invading Iraq.
@John Reidy, there’s certainly a gaping split in the conservative movement regarding the events in Egypt. Some are happy to see the greater goal of spreading democracy in the middle east coming to fruition through people power, driven by the youth who will form the next generation of leaders.
JamesK and Glen Beck are of the faction that would have preferred the west side against the Egyptian people in favour of their dictator; choosing authoritarianism over democracy. One wonders where these two stood on the Iraq invasion, and current attempts by the west to establish a functioning democracy there?
Eagerness to sacrifice another country’s freedoms due to a selfish paranoia for your own safety reveals a fear driven, cowardly mindset. And one that is wrong. Mubarak didn’t stop the Egyptian 9/11 hijackers from getting on those planes.
Egypt’s non-violent revolution, absent of people’s militias or suicide bombers in the face of torture and kidnappings by their government, shows a solid core of strength and maturity in their people. A modern example for the rest of the middle east and the rest of the world that dictators can be toppled not only by taking up weapons against them, but by abandoning fear of them.
So I say congratulations to the people of Egypt! You’ve made a beautiful first step on the path towards freedom and democracy. There a few pursuits more worthwhile in the story of a nation. God speed and good luck.
I agree.
There was a significant death toll in Egypt, however given the recent history of the region, this has been the close to the best possible outcome – for everyone – not just the people of Egypt.
Both sides of politics have been talking about the desire for democracy in the region, so precisely what the right did they really want?
Preumably jeebus is a Mark Riley’s love child:
“JamesK and Glen Beck are of the faction that would have preferred the west side against the Egyptian people in favour of their dictator” says the nutty leftist.
Show us all, jeebus, you twat, where I am in favour of Mubarak over the Egyptian people, (which is presumably what your incoherent drivel meant to say)?
Then perhaps show us where Glenn Beck said it.
Your a child jeebus.
And a liar.
@JamesK, oh many apologies. I must have missed the reason you were focusing entirely on the negatives of the revolution by linking to articles about the Muslim Brotherhood and reigns of terror.
Clearly you were not implying that the revolution is something to be feared and that Mubarak was the lesser of two evils. My mistake. Top of the morning to you.
botswana bob – Well written. I agree with your summary. The success of a true democratic state of Egypt will depend on the influence Israel and its agents have over the coming months.
I too am proud of the way the protesters behaved in the face of such fear and violence the government has thrown at them for all these years. If they are truly represented in government I am sure Egypt will flourish and be an example for others.
Disingenuous and a liar…….. leftist to the core
Wow, a hyper sensitive conservative who plays the victim card when called out for fear mongering. Colour me surprised.
Anyone who has followed a skerric of coverage over the last week could see that the Muslim Brotherhood played a small part in the protest movement, that the protestors were a very diversified bunch, and that their cries were for democracy not theocracy.
Elections this year will be a joyous occasion. Regardless of what happens in the future, they at least deserve that chance. If something goes pear shaped in the future we can take solace in the fact that many countries (including America) have experienced periods of internal strife or civil war and come out the other side after making the democratic transition.
Gee…… a woefully evil Iranian theocracy ….. whoda thunk it after the secular provisional government was installed after that naughty US luvin’ shah left town?
Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.