tip off
5

CIS scholar’s display of Asia illiteracy

The Age reports on a paper by CIS research scholar and Philosophy PhD student Benjamin Herscovitch contesting the need to extend the teaching of Asia literacy in the Australian education system.

As a staff member of the University of Melbourne’s Asia Institute, you can pretty well take it as read that I disagree with Herscovitch’s paper. It’s so misinformed that it’s barely worth a response, except that the paper provides some pseudo-intellectual cred to common or garden misperceptions.

The first of these is the claim that since English is increasing its hold as the global lingua franca, English speakers can successfully navigate the world while remaining monolingual. It is true that the number of those speaking and learning English as a second language is rising in Asia as it is rising everywhere else. But navigating those countries (whether for business, cultural, political or social purposes) while speaking and understanding only English provides only a very partial insight. You are overly reliant on feedback from those who (unlike you) have gone to the effort to become multilingual (noting that many non-English speakers in Asia are still bilingual or tri-lingual in local languages). Your attitude is that of someone who expects the world to come to you, without your making the effort to develop a two-way relationship with anyone.

The other misperception  is Herscovitch’s claim that migration from Asia has provided Australia with a ready-made Asia-literate population. And he is right in believing that first and second generation migrants are an important resource in developing Asia-literacy. But it is a resource that needs to be further developed through formal education. “Speaking an Asian language at home” does not necessarily equate to being able to read and write it at even a basic level (although of course many families supplement home conversation with Saturday classes).  Think back to your own English language fluency at primary school level, and then imagine not even being able to read. And imagine if all you knew about Australian politics and society was what your parents and their friends had told you and what you picked up from tv. Second generation kids need education in order to become Asia-literate, too.

I am not bragging about my own language fluency, by the way. I did not learn an Asian language at home, and despite my undergraduate major in Hindi/Urdu plus a few semesters in Arabic, my own fluency is still a work in progress. But at least I know enough to know how much I still don’t know – and enough to know that Benjamin Herscovitch knows sweet eff-all.

5

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    Scott
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    I don’t know Shakira.

    If I was going to do business in asia (china for example), I would prefer to hire a local in the country I am operating in. I don’t need my westernised staff to speak Mandarin when I can employ english speaking locals (who are probably cheaper to employ) and who understand the culture better than the most asian literate Australian.

    As for high level strategy/politics and the like, I could always hire specialised consultants for this if required.

    But the idea that my line staff and managers need to speak other languages is wrong in my opinion. I would much prefer management skills to language skills and day of the week (and I don’t think I am in the minority)
    The world is full of mandarin speaking graduates who struggle to find employment for this very reason.

  • 2
    Shakira Hussein
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    I agree that supplementing your stuff with locals is a good move. And of course you can always use translators (I’ve used translators myself in Indonesia and recently in Bangladesh). But even a degree of fluency of your own gives you an advantage over the monolingual. You’re not in the minority in preferring management skills over language skills, but the majority is blinkered on this issue.

  • 3
    Shakira Hussein
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    *supplementing your staff. Not stuff.

  • 4
    AaronH
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    The issue with learning many Asian languages is that they are tonal.

    I learned Mandarin as an adult, and it was an uphill struggle to become comfortable with tonality. Compare that with kids learning the language at a young age, who pick up the nuances of tonality with ease.

    Tonal languages need to be taught in primary school. It doesn’t matter whether the students go on to be fluent in that particular language, learning the basics of any tonal language will open the doors for them to learn others in future.

    If you get to high-school age and haven’t had any exposure to a tonal language, you are going to struggle to get past the first hurdle for many Asian languages.

    If we want the next generation to have any Chinese literacy at all, they need to be exposed to tonal languages, even to a small degree, at a young age. Once they pick up the basics, the door is open for them to go on with future study in any of the tonal languages of Asia, Southeast Asia or Africa.

  • 5
    Holden Back
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Heaven forfend that there might be some cultural insight, or even pleasure to be gained from learning another language!

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...