Commentary on violent and non-violent harm in world politics

We’ve moved – to Al Jazeera

   

The bloggers behind ‘This Blog Harms’ have moved.

NAJ Taylor will blog fortnightly for Al Jazeera, which you can view and subscribe to here.

Robin Cameron and Peter Chambers are launching an internet archive called, Socialising Security, which will be live soon.  Both Robin and Peter will also blog for Al Jazeera from time-to-time.

Additionally, we have begun to collaborate on a research paper on the subject of drones, and the relationship of technology to human society more generally. Stay tuned!

Lastly, we’d just like to say thank you to all of our readers, as well as the Crikey team. We hope you will continue to interact with us during what looks set to be an exciting phase of our foray into the blogosphere!

**  Feel free to follow us on Twitter: NAJ Taylor: @najtaylor and Robin Cameron: @robinwcameron

Exercise caution with KONY 2012

   

A brief comment on the KONY 2012 that has flooded social media over the last two days. I would suggest exercising extended  critical reflection on the issue before further circulating it. The issue is not as black and white as it is painted nor will any good solution come easily. Invisible Children’s suggestion of a military intervention will come at the cost of many lives and further destabilization to the region. The recent history of US interventions speak to this and any action should reflects events on the ground not the timing of a social media campaign.

If you really feel for the issue you owe it more than the initial emotional reaction such a video provokes. Read widely and open-mindedly the arguments for and against and then commit to this issue or another like it. I don’t say this out of cynicism but rather as a caution against what are very real dangers both now, and as a precedent for the future, associated with the ability of social media campaign to influence US foreign policy.

 

I am not an Uganda expert but I can offer some suggestions for further reading:

‘You don’t have my Vote’ on Unmuted

‘Taking ‘Kony 2012′ down a notch’ on Justice in Conflict

‘Let’s talk about Kony’ on Securing Rights

Invisible Children – Pretty Dang Visible on Duck of Minerva

A collation of insightful commentary including thought-provoking tweets from people in Uganda

A background piece from Foreign Affairs

 

xx Rob

 

A response to Luca Lana’s “Eclipse 1″

   

Luca Lana "Eclipse 1"

The following statement was written to accompany a rather novel – meaning tiny – installation by Luca Lana, titled “Eclipse 1”. The installation is set into the wall in the back lanes of Melbourne, and measures just 20x30cm. Showing at TwentyByThirty Gallery, Melbourne @ 20 Presgrave Place, off Little Collins Street. Until 31 March.  

The Abrahamic religions – Christianity, Judaism, and Islam – all attach an unrivalled degree of sacredness to the city of Jerusalem. Even today for their followers it remains a symbolic source of theological, scientific and aesthetic purity.

But nothing of religion, science or art is natural – all ideas and institutions are constructed by human society. Put another way, Jerusalem is in a very real sense just another city.

Predictably then, modern scientific sites like Greenwich and the Hadron Collider are beginning to be held in a similar form of spiritual and aesthetic reverence. For in them – like the Egyptian pyramids before them – one can see the very limits of human creation and knowledge.

In Eclipse 1, Luca Lana demonstrates how aesthetic representations of our world produce equally valid ideas as both Religion and Science. He does this through interpreting a solar eclipse in the form of a physical monument, rather than a scientific model or a divine intervention.

Where once the solar system was viewed as a pure act of God’s will, now its beauty is explained away by Science. Lana’s Eclipse 1 seems to me to make the claim that it is the aesthetic arts – and not Science or Religion – that is the next frontier of human discovery of our world, and more importantly still, our place in it.

NAJ Taylor
February 2012

Victoria’s state library: what a bloody pity

   

La Trobe Reading Room, State Library of Victoria, c.1950

I invite the Victorian Premier to visit the State Library of Victoria, unannounced, in order to see what a quagmire the place is in.

As Russell Marks and I argued in 2010, it’s a reference library – intended for silent work and study, as well as public engagement with what is marketed as Victoria’s “premier collection”. It is also charged with providing equitable access to literary and computer facilities for all Victorians.

Instead what you find is study spaces adjacent to busy conference tables, meaning that at most times – let alone peak study times – it is notably noisier for library patrons than it would be sitting on the floor in the foyer of ‘Jeff’s shed‘. For instance, you see more staff as you enter offering directions and bag checks, than you do servicing patrons trying to use the library facilities inside. And with little more than a few A4 sheets of paper asking for patrons to not reserve their seats for more than 20 minutes, there is no clear direction or guidance from staff on how to use any of the dozen or so spaces on offer.

Simply put, it must be immensely difficult to know how to engage with each of the spaces when coming to the library for the first time. Especially if just visiting one of the many art galleries or other attractions.

To be sure, the State Library of Victoria offers a beautiful architectural environment in which to work.

But having used the state libraries of Hobart, Brisbane, Canberra, Adelaide, and Sydney this past 12 months, in my view it falls short of the nation’s standard.

Read More »

Notes from Occupied Melbourne, 2012

   

a) Why, it’s kicking off everywhere… except Melbourne

It’s been a wild year. After two to three years of seeming paralysis after the GFC, things kicked off. Indeed, as Paul Mason’s timely canvassing of the issue says, it appears to be kicking off everywhere.

Everywhere except Australia.

A pedal through Melbourne’s leafy north-east the other Sunday offered telling ride-by snapshots of middle-class Australia in 2012. On lower Heidelberg Road there’s a billboard advertising domain.com.au’s new iPad app, telling its punters ‘You’re not a property buyer, you’re a warrior in a battle for territory’ (?!); a few Ks up the road, the ‘Save Ivanhoe!’ campaign – signs on the plush, deep lawns of capacious interwar houses – reminds all passers by that ‘we’ oppose inappropriate development. But the most telling combo is just south of the Eastern, on Belmore Road, where the mausoleum bling of display home McMansions (with names like The Consort, the Ambassador, The Concubine), stretching from Box Hill to Kew, is punctuated by 100s upon 100s of dead CRT TVs. They’re everywhere: small and massive, old and new, many with cardboard signs saying ‘works fine’ and the remotes sticky taped to the top. Others lie face down on the nature strip besides curious baby magpies or reel silently against trees, their faces tagged up or smashed in. Who tags a dead TV? Thousands of people, apparently. Some have been there for months in the grass, soaking up the dog piss and the rain, waiting for the TV angels to swoop down and take them to TV heaven, or Lagos.

Middle-class suburban Australia in 2012 seems untouchably far from everything except itself, in which it remains totally, contentedly absorbed. When the weather’s good, you get the sense that things will be like this forever. Talking Heads said it: heaven really is a place, a where nothing, nothing ever happens. The countervoice says: ‘a storm is blowing in from Paradise’. Cyclones make it this far south when they’re made out of capital, when capital is built out of promises and premises that turn out to be false. I cycle past another sign, which reads ‘guard dogs patrol these premises’. We’ll need another decade or three to know what McMansion Australia was really made of. I have a feeling many of the CRTs will still be on the nature strip. But my sense is that, just like they still work fine for free-to-air, the TVs gathering in our streets can be viewed as a form of unwitting political assembly. In one sense they the real Occupy Melbourne, in that they do accurately represent the actions, interests and credit card transactions of the 99%.

Their presence says so much about Australia. Somehow it’s totally okay to throw out a TV, leave it on the street. We trust that someone will pick it up; sometimes hard rubbish do. Or dawn brigades of ageless Carnie-like men – the ones who monster the still dark stalls of Camberwell market of a Sunday – will spirit them away. Their presence also suggests, perhaps, that we trust that those who do pick our ex companions up will take them somewhere and treat them with the respect you would treat aged pet or parent. Put away quietly somewhere. Personally, their presence chills me, they’re sentinels from a future doom. ‘Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one catastrophe, which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet…’

Read More »

What do we mean by ‘sexist’ when we refer to the criticisms of Gillard?

   

The lack of agreement on the question of whether undue criticism of Gillard is sexist boils down to how we think about sexism. Is sexism something we view at an individual level or a wider social structural level? Is it still sexism, when gender discrimination occurs at a structural level?

Before addressing this, I’d just like to mark a special moment that arose because of this issue; Monday saw Christopher Pyne and Bob Katter coming out in support of women’s rights. Who would have thought that in 2012 Katter and Pyne would be the standard-bearers in the fight against sexism?

Oh, except they really aren’t.

After reassuring the Australian people on Monday that he would be the first to call out any sexism against Gillard, two days later Pyne was labeling her ‘worse than lady MacBeth’. Way to single her out specifically on the basis of her gender characteristics Christopher Pyne.

And then there’s Bob Katter. He correctly identified that Australia has a female Governor-General, a female Premier and female Prime Minister. You’re right Bob Katter, Australia couldn’t possibly be denying opportunity to women. But it took only one sentence for him to say that it’s “you know, if anything probably the other way around”. Oh well, back to square one.

Read More »

Investment bankers in drag

   

Responsible Investing – despite what the appellation ‘responsible’ might suggest – is not about investing morally. In fact, such investors commonly view ethical concerns as a values-based distraction from the primary task of making money.

As such, Responsible Investors (let’s give them the moniker, “Ms Responsible”) do not exclude companies or industry sectors for being unethical or harmful to the natural environment, human society, or the economy. The issue of climate change, for example, only matters in so far as it affects financial returns.

So, whilst there may be a favourable ethical outcome from investing ‘responsibly’ – such as the exclusion of mining company LWY for failing to adequately manage its carbon tax exposure – such an decision would come about to be financially prudent, not moral.

There is, therefore, nothing more moral about Ms Responsible than Mr Finance-101 – one of those investment firms that are the target of the Occupy Wall Street protest movement such as hedge funds, investment banks, and so on.

Ms Responsible does differ from Mr Finance-101 in two ways.

Read More »

From the Worrier Pose to Narcissisasana (and Back): why it might be no bad thing if yoga wrecks you

   

We know how yoga can wreck your body. But I wonder: isn’t it more that we’ve wrecked yoga? In other words: ask not what your yoga is doing to you; ask what we are doing to our yoga. Responding adequately to that question would require knowing about how yoga ought to be, ideally. I have no idea about this, and I would feel uncomfortable adopting a ‘normative yoga posture’. But I do know a little about governance, and its norms. And after spending some more time re-reading Broad’s article, considering the responses to it, and spending the week discussing it with several of my yoga-practicing friends, I’m convinced that there is more than a little of governance in our yoga practice.

a) governance: coping with coping

Governance is a buzzword, even a planetary vulgate. But it’s a word with a history. To many people, it’s just a cryptic way of saying things like neoliberal, corporate, or capitalist. On this account, governance would be the ideological way that neoliberal capitalists working for corporations talk about their ideology.

There’s substantial truth to that interpretation, but to me, governance is better thought of as a modus vivendi – it’s a way of coping. A means of negotiating a tolerable way through the intolerable (but ineradicable). It’s not optimal, it’s not perfect, but it’s all we (as stakeholders) have to work with (going forward). The best that we can hope for is to meet, consult, and negotiate. More than any other leader in Australia’s history, Julia Gillard speaks the language of governance from the depths of her soul; this is why she has a passion for negotiation (even if she can’t pronounce it). We have to cope because we have no choice, because we are interdependent. And our working environments, like our world, they are increasingly complex. To that extent, governance is merely the least worst way of dealing, of managing, of coping. But there’s more to it than that.

Read More »

Homeland: TBH TV Review

   

Airing on Sunday nights is a new TV drama, Homeland, which explores the phenomenon of ‘sleeper cells’. Understandably, this show seeks to position itself as something other than an alarmist Bush-era program about terrorists. In this case the potential sleeper agent is a serving marine. Ultimately, however, this plot innovation is really just an elaborate attempt to provide a seemingly reasonable justification for the kind of security policies associated with previous shows like 24.

First off, a comment on the marketing of the show for Australian audiences: it’s awful. The attempt by the writers of Homeland to negotiate complex politics through a multi-layered plot-line has been erased completely from the Australian promotional material released by Channel 10. Here they are selling a complex psychological/political thriller as tawdry pap.

YouTube Preview Image

I’m not sure if this should be taken as a comment on the the likely viewing audience, but we can say at the very least that someone in Channel Ten’s marketing department seems to think we are not very clever. Clearly we are not judged ready for the sophisticated style of storytelling that have graced our TV screens (and laptops) thanks to US cable television over the last decade.

Read More »

Update: Colbert’s (sort of) presidential campaign

   

Last week, comedian Stephen Colbert announced his entry into mucky world of American electoral politics with a satirical bid for nomination in the Republican South Carolina primary. In this short space of time Colbert was able to momentarily overshadow the deep banality of the Republican nomination process and cast attention on the absurd system of campaign finance laws presently in place in the US. He did this by releasing a series of attack ads that he (well, technically fellow comedian Jon Stewart) financed and produced using a Super PAC that allowed the channeling of an undisclosed but large amount of money raised from anonymous sources into .

The first attack ad (included in a previous post) accused the then leading candidate, Mitt Romney, of being a serial killer. This accusation was founded on the idea that if ‘corporations are people’, then Romney’s history of profiting from aggressive corporate restructures constitutes murder. This played on the underlying logic of the argument that organizations have the same right to free speech as individuals under the constitution, an argument that paved the way for unlimited financing of political campaigning.

This mucky blend of corporate profit-taking and political interference was the focus of his second attack ad.

YouTube Preview Image

Having promised the fix the political process with more senseless ads of his own, the actual campaign by Colbert for nomination hit an early stumbling block when it became clear that he was not going to be on the ballot as the list of nominees had already been finalized. This would not stop him from wreaking havoc.

Read More »