Gaddafi was dead, but long lived Gaddafi (in Australian media)
Ten minutes before I published this post, I noticed reports in online world news media said Gaddafi was dead, alive or in some strange cases, both, so I decided to take screenshots for safekeeping. (BTW, the same thing appears to have happened in the United States).
This post has been revised to provide a storyboard of online media reporting of the death of Gaddafi.
11:50pm: The news first breaks of Gaddafi’s death, and the media scrambles to cover it…
In recent times, the most notable source of news on the Middle East is surely Al Jazeera’s live blogs. The Libya Blog and homepage of Al Jazeera reported at 11:50pm AEST that Gaddafi was dead in these terms:
Muammar Gaddafi was killed in an attack by NTC forces, the Council’s information minister Mahmoud Shammam told Reuters.
Within 20 minutes, Al Jazeera had twice confirmed the reports and posted an “obitary” video on its website:
So this was the news from the Middle East just after midnight
By 12:13am Al Jazeera had broke the news that Gaddafi was in fact dead. The Arabic news outlet cited senior commanders in Libya’s Transitional National Council (TNC) who claimed that Gaddafi has been “killed in battle near Sirte” only hours after Gaddafi’s hometown had fallen:
Abdul Hakim Belhaj, an NTC military chief, has confirmed that Muammar Gaddafi has died of his wounds after being captured near Sirte.
The body of the former Libyan leader was taken to a location which is being kept secret for security reasons, an NTC official said.
“Gaddafi’s body is with our unit in a car and we are taking the body to a secret place for security reasons,” Mohamed Abdel Kafi, an NTC official in the city of Misrata, told Reuters.
But in Australia (and on the BBC)…
The BBC resolutely stated that Gaddafi has been captured alive. Going so far as to say:
The BBC’s Gabriel Gatehouse in Sirte: “I have spoken to the man who says that he captured him… he said he found him hiding in a hole”. Commanders for Libya’s transitional authorities say they have captured ousted leader Col Muammar Gaddafi.
And yet by this stage Al Jazeera had already uploaded a “confirmed photograph” of a deceased Gaddafi, as well as one of the sewer in which he was located and killed.

…by now a number of seemingly official reports were coming in on Al Jazeera’s Libya Blog…
Abdul Hafiz Ghoga, vice chairman of Libya’s National Transitional Council, confirmed that the ousted leader had been killed on October 20, 2011 near Sirte.
“We announce to the world that Muammar Gaddafi has been killed at the hands of the revolutionaries,” Ghoga told a news conference in Benghazi.
… and video footage was posted soon thereafter…
By 1:26am Al Arabiya had posted a video of Gaddafi’s body also…
…and another Al Arabiya video at 1:38am of higher quality:
But in Australia, more than 30 minutes after the news was out, much of the local media was still tentative or completely unsure…
At 12:29am The Age With the text accompanying the lead story reading:
MUAMMAR Gaddafi’s last stronghold fell last night, prompting celebrations across Libya amid reports that the former dictator had been captured and killed.
Gaddafi – who ruled Libya with an iron fist for nearly 42 years before being driven from power by a long and bloody uprising – was reported to have been badly injured or killed in a gun battle as he tried to flee his hometown of Sirt.
There were conflicting reports of his condition – some said he had been shot in the legs, and others that he was critically injured and had died, according to Al Jazeera.
But now even in Britain the BBC had moved, and the Middle East sources such as Al Jazeera developed a microsite of content, including opinion pieces and editorial.
Not believing the headlines in Australia, I decided to read the top stories of some of the major papers and was amazed at the inconsistency within the reports of Fairfax.
Even an hour after his death, The Age at 12:55am opened their report with a conflicting report:
MUAMMAR Gaddafi’s last stronghold fell last night, prompting celebrations across Libya amid reports that the former dictator had been captured and killed.
Gaddafi – who ruled Libya with an iron fist for nearly 42 years before being driven from power by a long and bloody uprising – was reported to have been badly injured or killed in a gun battle as he tried to flee his hometown of Sirt.
There were conflicting reports of his condition – some said he had been shot in the legs, and others that he was critically injured and had died, according to Al Jazeera.
“He has been captured. He is badly wounded, but he is still breathing,” National Transitional Council commander Mohamed Leith told AFP.
By 12:55am SMH had opened their report by saying:
Muammar Gaddafi – the dictator who ruled Libya with an iron fist for nearly 42 years before being driven from power in a bloody uprising – has been killed as he tried to flee his hometown of Sirte.
There were conflicting reports of how he was killed – there were initial reports that he was killed in a gun battle, but NATO has since confirmed it hit a convoy of Gaddafi loyalists fleeing Sirte on Thursday. It could not say whether the former Libyan leader was in the convoy, Associated Press reported.
Meanwhile, by 12:58am the Canberra Times had moved as far as saying:
Former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi died of wounds suffered on Thursday as fighters battling to complete an eight-month-old uprising against his rule overran his hometown Sirte, Libya’s interim rulers said.
Gaddafi was reportedly fleeing his home town of Sirtre in in a convoy that was attacked by NATO war planes.
His killing, which came swiftly after his capture near Sirte, is the most dramatic single development in the Arab Spring revolts that have unseated rulers in Egypt and Tunisia and threatened the grip on power of the leaders of Syria and Yemen.
Whereas the Middle Eastern channels by now had fully integrated the news into their websites.
But still in Britain and Australia the reports were conflicting, and the top stories were suggesting he may still be alive as his death was not yet independently verified…
Let’s look at how desperate the BBC were getting (be sure to watch the videos in the links)…
By 1:22am the BBC’s main story page (above) does include a blog post of the image of Gaddafi that had been on Al Jazeera for some 30 minutes along with the caption:
“Here’s a grab of that image from Al-Jazeera purporting to show Col Gaddafi’s body being dragged along the street”.
Elsewhere on the site the BBC posted a report from one of its correspondents claiming to have spoken to the 20-year old man who caught Gaddafi and had as evidence Gaddafi’s “golden pistol”. Another report the BBC uploaded amazingly runs through the details of the killings, with the reporter leading the witnesses into even alleging that one of them “hit Gaddafi with his shoes”. Excerpts of this ridiculous BBC report made it into a report filed by the Associated Press.
I decided to have a read of The Australian’s lead story at 1:34am to see if there was any more clarity…
An anti-Gaddafi fighter said the former leader had been found hiding in a hole and shouted “Don’t shoot, don’t shoot” when confronted by fighters of the NTC.Some reports claimed Gaddafi had been shot in both legs.
NTC commander Mohamed Leith, announcing Gaddafi’s capture, said: “He is badly wounded, but he is still breathing.
“He added that he had seen Gaddafi himself and that he was wearing a khaki uniform and a turban.Gaddafi was reported to have been taken to a hospital in Sirte and NTC troops said he was then taken on to Misratah.
“He’s captured. He’s wounded in both legs . . . he’s been taken away by ambulance,” a senior NTC military official was quoted as saying.
Some news reports said Gaddafi had died en route to a hospital.
With the news that Gaddafi was dead over an hour-and-a-half old, Al Jazeera were posting interviews of those celebrating in Tripoli…
And then finally, two hours after his death, at 1:50am, The Australian and the ABC report that Gaddafi has been killed…
(A cheeky last dig for those so minded: Going by this screenshot taken at 5:51am, poor SBS went to sleep unsure).
Note: this post will be updated from 12:00am throughout the night as more information becomes available.
Follow NAJ Taylor on Twitter: @najtaylor

































Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.
Gaddafi shoots someone without trial = murderous dictator.
Someone shoots Gaddafi without trial = noble freedom fighter.
So let’s fire our guns in the air, shout something about Allah, put the women in bin-liners, and onward to democracy!!!
Meanwhile in Australia which appears to think it’s on some very long summer holiday the ABC opened with who the queen was meeting some leadership speculation and at about 7.15 told us Gaddaif was dead. My 14 yo looked at me and said ‘isn’t that big?’ ‘yes’ I said. She then asked the unanswerable ‘how come all that queen stuff was on first?’
When I first heard the news on ABC radio last night (about 10.30pm) and turned on to see what the news services were doing – it was quite instructive. BBC World and CNN in Gaddaffi overdrive, ABC 1 showing Lateline but giving updates. The commercials were going ahead with normal programming, because we need to watch all those repeats of American comedies.
Good old Fox News were showing an item on the American flag, complete with patriotic song, but did switch over to a bunch of people sitting on a couch chatting about Gaddaffi after 11pm.
You do wonder about the priorities of the media at times (well, all the time actually….). Not sure how the Queen taking snaps of kangaroos at Yarralumla is more important than the Gaddaffi story!
NBC did it better than anyone.
1. wild animals from the private zoo on the loose now all dead
2. waitress handed note by customer (instead of tip) saying “loose weight”..she finally speaks out !
3. Ghaddafi believed captured and dead.
I find the gloating over any murder to be quite depraved.
Hi Marilyn, apologies if I’ve caused offence. It remains unclear whether Gaddafi was “murdered” or in fact how he died, but irrespective of that, my post was merely to highlight the conduct of world news media, particularly in relation to internationally significant events such as this. In the process of so doing, I appreciate the post includes a battery of images that individually, and collectively, are quite disturbing.
I’ve not seen any comments here or media reports elsewhere that gloat. So am interested in your further thoughts so that I may address them.
I agree, this is a summary of how the media works (or doesn’t work) when a big story breaks.
Dear Jean,
Thank you for encapsulating in so few words so many of the attitudes that grieve me.
I have lived in Libya during two periods of my life. In 1980 I travelled to Benghazi with my family and worked there for two years, as an English teacher at Garyounis University. More recently, in March of 2009, I returned alone to Libya, where I taught for six months at the Police Academy in Tripoli and for a short stint at the Police Academy in Benghazi. (The Academy complex in Benghazi was reportedly destroyed in the early days of the uprising.) There followed a 2-month stretch in Kuwait, then home for a few months followed by six months in Sana’a, the capital of Yemen.
As you might imagine, I have been watching the unfolding of The Arab Spring with my heart in my throat.
When I got up this morning on the gorgeous north coast of Tasmania and turned on the radio, I heard that Muammar Gaddafi had been killed.
I am neither ashamed nor embarrassed to say that I was overcome with a sensation of joy.
Almost immediately, of course, I began to wonder if this could be another ‘mistake’ in the media-reporting of the conflict in Libya, like the death and/or capture of the various Gaddafi sons and henchmen who, as it transpired, hadn’t been killed or captured at all, or perhaps had later been freed by Gaddafi loyalists lurking among the freedom fighters.
For the next few enthralling hours I listened to the radio and surfed the internet. The photos of the dead person purporting to be Gaddafi might have been clearer, but it sure looked like him. I began to relax into a quieter, more moderate joy, and a hope tinged with sadness at all the lives that had been lost or spoiled during the 42 years of tyranny and these last 8 months of defiance.
And I am affected, not just by the lives of the innocent and courageous, and the grief of their families, but also by all those other lives that had been seduced and corrupted by the sheer personal power of the man, the stranglehold of the regime, and the privilege it could, and did confer on those who were loyal to it. The grief of their families, too.
How could we really blame or pass judgement on those who had hitched their wagons to the Gaddafi juggernaut, when opposition seemed, and indeed was, pointless and deadly, and when there was no other way out of the pit of poverty and hopelessness? For 42 years, the doubters had been hanged, or lined up and shot, sometimes even ‘live’ on national television. Even during the years that Gaddafi was being courted by ‘the west’, when the average Libyan was living on the equivalent of $2 a day and the billions flowed freely into Gaddafi’s pockets, dissent was being murdered. And we knew.
How profound was the courage of those who rose up against it?
Which of us could truly say what we would have done in a similar situation? Not me anyway, unchallenged and untried as I have always been – enjoying the freedom and peace, opportunity and privilege that my parents’ generation fought for, killed and died for, during the Second World War.
Well, not exactly untried. Tried, and found wanting, I think.
There were times during my life in Libya when I might have shown some courage, and there were times when I did show a little bit. But when it came, in 1982, to being followed around by the secret police everywhere I went, because I was trying to help a Polish woman and her daughter escape to Australia, I became so frightened that I had to hand the whole mess over to my more courageous then-husband and flee. At that time, Poland was behind the Iron Curtain, and Polish doctors, nurses and technicians were being put onto non-stop flights back to Warsaw at the end of their contracts in Libya. I heard later that Sofia and her daughter had settled in Perth, WA. I hope they are still happy and well.
So when I returned to Libya in 2009, I looked and listened, of course, and noticed things, but said nothing, and nobody said anything to me. Not once in 6 months did I hear the word ‘Gaddafi’ from the lips of any Libyan person. That’s how it was, and how it had to be. Fear rules, or so it seemed. I was relieved when my contract came to an end.
If you had asked me then if Gaddafi could be overthrown, I would have said ‘no’. I could not have imagined it.
Now, I think about my students and wonder. Who is still alive and who is dead? There is only one student, because of his presence on Facebook, that I know to be alive.
I think about the classroom full of students who were bussed in every day from Al Zowia. They were in the Elementary class. How many of their eager faces are smiling today? How many of them are shooting their rifles at the sky in jubilation, wantonly wasting their ammunition? I have no way of knowing, but the fighting was so fierce and so prolonged in and around their hometown that I can only accept that some, and maybe many of them are gone now– men and women, girls and boys.
Libya has been in a state of war during these last 8 months. The rules of war apply, as does a little understanding about the 42 years that went before. How many of us would have quibbled if someone had shot Hitler? Gaddafi was a combatant, self-declared. He had vowed to fight to the death, to flush out the ‘rats’ and kill them all. (The wonderful irony of his having been found like a rat hiding in a sewer has not been overlooked by the media, and will go down in history.) He was the leader of a rotten regime. It has been reported that up until just a few hours before he died, Gaddafi was busy recruiting yet more sub-Saharan African mercenaries to come to his support so that he could be reinstated to his ‘rightful’ position.
If he had been captured alive and put on trial, would the fighting have stopped? Or would his followers have continued to hope and just kept on with the war? And of course there is the possibility that he might have escaped, as others have quite mysteriously escaped , including at least one and probably two of his sons during the battle for Tripoli. As the saying goes – where there’s life, there’s hope.
In war, Jean, we do kill the fighters on the other side. And if the leader of the enemy troops comes into our sights, we shoot him if we can. We’ll probably never know all the fascinating details about just what happened, and we don’t need to. Was it murder or was it an act of war? Is it really an either/or proposition? Whatever else it was, it was certainly a legitimate act of war.
As I write this, Libya’s interim leaders continue the debate about where to bury Gaddafi. They know how powerful he is, even in death. How and where can he be buried without his grave becoming a mini-Mecca for those who believe as he did?
We are all going to be disappointed, one way or another, by the way things work out in Libya. The future might look rosy now, but it won’t be rosy. Not all of the rebels are angels or saints. Some of them are thugs and some are simply misguided, just like we are. Many of those who defected from the Gaddafi camp during these last few months were genuine. But there must be some, at least, who thought they were backing a new winner.
Self-interest is human. It is not self-interest that has been killed, and it will never go away. It will fly into Tripoli and Benghazi on corporate jets. It is already there, on the ground, has always been there, the incomers greeted with handshakes and great big smiles, just like we do it down here in beautiful Tasmania. And, of course, the oil will flow again, and with it, wealth. We can only hope that a goodly proportion of that wealth will now flow to its rightful owners.
Reconstruction is in almost everyone’s interest, and will happen. But reconciliation might not.
So let’s get down off our smug little high-horse and consider. There will still be skirmishes, of course – more lives will be tragically lost before order is established in Libya, if it ever is or ever can be. But let’s think for a quiet moment about all those lives that will not have to be lost, now that Gaddafi is dead.
The shot that killed Gaddafi was the shot that ended this particular war. It will resound throughout the region – Yemen, Bahrain, and Syria in particular. Dictators will not take heart from it, but the people will.
And by the way, Jean. The ‘something’ that is shouted about Allah translates as ‘God is Great.’ And Libyan women don’t wear garbage bags, bin-liners or even pillar boxes, although Muslim/Arab women do cover themselves top to bottom except for their eyes in some other countries. In Yemen, where I have also lived and worked, almost all the women wear the ‘pillar box’. In Libya, though, the married women used to wear the birka – a kind of white sheet thing that wrapped the whole body and was held by the hand or in the teeth so that you looked at one eye, and one eye looked back at you, sometimes friendly, sometimes not. Always curious. Now, nearly all women wear the headscarf, and look you in the face. And, modesty permitting, they wear whatever else they want to wear, or can afford, within reason, under the circumstances.
Kate, I don’t quite follow why you’ve copied and pasted Jean’s comments, and included a lengthy statement from someone else to Jean. I also don’t know where that statement is on Crikey.com.au. I only author This Blog Harms, which is published by Crikey.
I published it, but am unsure how or if I am being asked to respond.
Hoping to hear from you! And thanks.
Sorry for the confusion. I read your piece and the comments that followed, including Jean’s. I was quite upset about what she said. The ‘lengthy statement from someone else’ is, in fact, from me. The reason I copied and pasted Jean’s comment is that there had been quite a few comments posted, and mine was just going to be too far away from Jean’s. I’m afraid I am deeply ignorant about this whole process.
No, you don’t need to respond.
Ok, thanks for contributing! You can see I’ve edited your original post. Best copy and paste the content you wish to cite, then highlight it in this comment box, and click “b-quote” above.
There is no guarantee Jean is subscribed to the comments that flow on, or will reply.
Thanks for your help. I’ll keep an eye on your work in future, with interest. In the meantime, let’s conduct ourselves with a little decorum and show some respect for the Libyan people and all they have endured. Yes, atrocities have occurred, probably on both sides, and the perpetrators must be brought to account. However, the killing of Gaddafi, as distasteful as some aspects of the event may have been, was not a war crime.
By the way, I can’t see ‘b-quote’. Where is it?
At present it remains unclear how Gaddafi was killed, the UN has called an inquiry into his death after alleged videos of him alive were circulated and his body was mistreated. See this NY Times piece for e.g.
(Kate – “b-quote” is directly above this box where you write your comments, as are other features like inserting hyperlinks, making highlighted text bold, etc”.
That must be the little box next to Post a Comment. Anyway, interesting to note that among those calling for an investigation into Gaddafi’s death, is his family. For goodness sake! I really hope this matter will not be pursued. After all, the ins-and-outs of Osama Bin Laden’s death, despite calls for a thorough investigation at the time, have not been pursued, at least not in any public/punitive way. (Although the wheels that grind exceedingly slow may well be grinding off-stage.) Bin Laden’s death was a much more cold-blooded affair, orchestrated from the White House itself, while the death of Gaddafi occurred in the heat of battle and in the heat of the moment.
It’s so tempting for the likes off us, comfortable in our privileged ‘lifestyles’ to pontificate and find fault and even make fun. It would be good if the extraordinary events that have been sweeping through North Africa and the Middle East these last many months could touch the rest of us a little more deeply and truly than we have sometimes allowed them to do.
So thanks for your interest and your help. There will be times when I will notice things in the media which you might have missed – you can’t be awake and on the job 24/7, as they say. So I hope you won’t mind if I make a comment sometimes.
Thank you I will now feel free. I don’t understand Twitter, but I’ll try. In the meantime, I should say that I’m a former journalist (burnt out) who just happened to be in North Africa and the Middle East during the first flowering of the ‘Arab Spring’, working as a teacher. I haven’t written a ‘journailstic’ piece in more than twenty years. But this story, this bigger story about North Africa and the Middle East is so important that I would like to come out of my shell a little bit, if I can, gently.
We’d all dearly like to hear your insights and thoughts of the situation there. I look forward to hear more from you!
Thanks for your encouragement – it is greatly appreciated. Whilst we have been having this little conversation, my daughter has organised me into a blog site. So I tidied up my response to Jean and have posted it as my very first blog. The link is http://kateahearne.wordpress.com/
I haven’t managed to get to your work on Twitter, but I’ll do that today – looking forward to it.
You’re very kind. I’ve just been trying to get an article to you that came into my inbox from Google. By Charles Ronan. Motions on Line. The Official student Newspaper of the San Diego School of Law. Killing Al-Awlaki: Was it Legal? Was it Right? I did mange to ‘tweet’ it, whatever that means, but wasn’t able to get it directly to you. Also, tried to post a comment without success. Never mind. Maybe next time. Ronan’s article is a really good, sane piece. I thought I might use it as a jumping-off point for my next effort.
Back to the drawing board.
Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.