<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gerard Henderson joins the right-wing chorus blaming &#8216;do-gooders&#8217; for the crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/</link>
	<description>Trevor Cook on public relations, social media and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:16:29 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Cook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4354#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>I liked Pelosi&#039;s speech (I guess that stuns you). You know that a majority of Democrats supported a republican administration&#039;s proposal and a minority of republicans supported it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Pelosi&#8217;s speech (I guess that stuns you). You know that a majority of Democrats supported a republican administration&#8217;s proposal and a minority of republicans supported it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generic Person</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Generic Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4354#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>[his bizarre effort to foist the blame onto the Democrats]

Can&#039;t be any worse than Pelosi&#039;s idiotic speech proclaiming that the Republicans were solely to blame for the bail-out bill not passing when the fact of the matter is that 95 Democrats opposed it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>his bizarre effort to foist the blame onto the Democrats</p></blockquote>
<p>Can&#8217;t be any worse than Pelosi&#8217;s idiotic speech proclaiming that the Republicans were solely to blame for the bail-out bill not passing when the fact of the matter is that 95 Democrats opposed it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Cook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4354#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>Still, generic person, the amounts cited re CRA seem small and don&#039;t add up to a $700 billion bailout. Isn&#039;t it also true that Bush weakened the CRA requirements so how come that didn&#039;t solve the problem. There just doesn&#039;t seem to be a strong causal link between CRA and the current crisis does there? The idea that it DROVE the market seems like an exaggeration to say the least.

Moreover, all this goes to prove that the CRA did it theory is controversial and Henderson ignored that in his bizarre effort to foist the blame onto the Democrats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, generic person, the amounts cited re CRA seem small and don&#8217;t add up to a $700 billion bailout. Isn&#8217;t it also true that Bush weakened the CRA requirements so how come that didn&#8217;t solve the problem. There just doesn&#8217;t seem to be a strong causal link between CRA and the current crisis does there? The idea that it DROVE the market seems like an exaggeration to say the least.</p>
<p>Moreover, all this goes to prove that the CRA did it theory is controversial and Henderson ignored that in his bizarre effort to foist the blame onto the Democrats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generic Person</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Generic Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4354#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>Mate, the only drivel is your nonsensical pastiche of pro-Democrat articles.

A good comment by poster &quot;Adoseoftruth&quot;:

[This article is incorrect in its premise.

In early 1993 President Bill Clinton ordered new regulations for the CRA which would increase access to mortgage credit for inner city and distressed rural communities. The new rules went into effect on January 31, 1995 and featured: requiring strictly numerical assessments to get a satisfactory CRA rating; using federal home-loan data broken down by neighborhood, income group, and race; encouraging community groups to complain when banks were not loaning enough to specified neighborhood, income group, and race; allowing community groups that marketed loans to targeted groups to collect a fee from the banks.

The new rules, during a time when many banks were merging and needed to pass the CRA review process to do so, substantially increased the number and aggregate amount of loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers for home loans, some of which were &quot;risky mortgages. Banks set up CRA departments, a CRA consultant industry was created and new financial-services firms helped banks invest in packaged portfolios of CRA loans to ensure compliance. Established and new community groups began marketing such mortgages. The Senate Banking Committee estimated that as of 2000, as a result of CRA, such groups had received $9.5 billion in services and salaries. As of that time such groups also had received tens of billions of dollars in multi-year commitments from banks, including ACORN Housing $760 million; Boston-based Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America $3 billion; a New Jersey Citizen Action-led coalition $13 billion; the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance $220 million. The number of CRA mortgage loans increased by 39 percent between 1993 and 1998, while other loans increased by only 17 percent.

The CRA was public policy that DROVE the market. To cast a blind eye that obvious econic fact and simply blame &quot;the profit motive&quot; is ludicrous.

It is equally ludicrous to blame Wall Street and investment banks when what they did was buy up the risky mortgages that became so prevalent in the market place.

Granted, no one intended to lose money, but, to lay blame on capitalism when the real source of the problem was government in the first place indicates to me a fundamental lack of economic understanding.]

http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/community_reinv.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mate, the only drivel is your nonsensical pastiche of pro-Democrat articles.</p>
<p>A good comment by poster &#8220;Adoseoftruth&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>This article is incorrect in its premise.</p>
<p>In early 1993 President Bill Clinton ordered new regulations for the CRA which would increase access to mortgage credit for inner city and distressed rural communities. The new rules went into effect on January 31, 1995 and featured: requiring strictly numerical assessments to get a satisfactory CRA rating; using federal home-loan data broken down by neighborhood, income group, and race; encouraging community groups to complain when banks were not loaning enough to specified neighborhood, income group, and race; allowing community groups that marketed loans to targeted groups to collect a fee from the banks.</p>
<p>The new rules, during a time when many banks were merging and needed to pass the CRA review process to do so, substantially increased the number and aggregate amount of loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers for home loans, some of which were "risky mortgages. Banks set up CRA departments, a CRA consultant industry was created and new financial-services firms helped banks invest in packaged portfolios of CRA loans to ensure compliance. Established and new community groups began marketing such mortgages. The Senate Banking Committee estimated that as of 2000, as a result of CRA, such groups had received $9.5 billion in services and salaries. As of that time such groups also had received tens of billions of dollars in multi-year commitments from banks, including ACORN Housing $760 million; Boston-based Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America $3 billion; a New Jersey Citizen Action-led coalition $13 billion; the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance $220 million. The number of CRA mortgage loans increased by 39 percent between 1993 and 1998, while other loans increased by only 17 percent.</p>
<p>The CRA was public policy that DROVE the market. To cast a blind eye that obvious econic fact and simply blame "the profit motive" is ludicrous.</p>
<p>It is equally ludicrous to blame Wall Street and investment banks when what they did was buy up the risky mortgages that became so prevalent in the market place.</p>
<p>Granted, no one intended to lose money, but, to lay blame on capitalism when the real source of the problem was government in the first place indicates to me a fundamental lack of economic understanding.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/community_reinv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/community_reinv.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Carruthers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/07/gerard-henderson-joins-the-right-wing-chorus-blaming-do-gooders-for-the-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Carruthers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4354#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>Never let the fact that deregulation was an important agenda item for the Republicans get in the way of a good story.  Also highly risky credit swaps and securitization of crappy loans had nothing to do with the entire debacle either!  

BTW congrats on the new blog home :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never let the fact that deregulation was an important agenda item for the Republicans get in the way of a good story.  Also highly risky credit swaps and securitization of crappy loans had nothing to do with the entire debacle either!  </p>
<p>BTW congrats on the new blog home <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
