<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Corporate Engagement &#187; Government relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/category/public-relations/government-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook</link>
	<description>Trevor Cook on public relations, social media and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lobbying pays</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2009/04/15/lobbying-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2009/04/15/lobbying-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=5693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From marginal revolution:
In a remarkable illustration of the power of lobbying in Washington, a study released last week found that a single tax break in 2004 earned companies $220 for every dollar they spent on the issue &#8212; a 22,000 percent rate of return on their investment.
The study by researchers at the University of Kansas underscores the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/04/lobbying-pays.html">marginal revolution</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a remarkable illustration of the power of lobbying in Washington, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1375082">a study</a> released last week found that a single tax break in 2004 earned companies $220 for every dollar they spent on the issue &#8212; a 22,000 percent rate of return on their investment.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The study by researchers at the University of Kansas underscores the central reason that lobbying has become a $3 billion-a-year industry in Washington: It pays. The $787 billion stimulus act and major spending proposals have ratcheted up the lobbying frenzy further this year, even as President Obama and public-interest groups press for sharper restrictions on the practice.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2009/04/15/lobbying-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cotterell leaves Crosby Textor to establish &#8216;apolitical&#8217; lobby firm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/10/cotterell-leaves-crosby-textor-to-establish-apolitical-lobby-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/10/cotterell-leaves-crosby-textor-to-establish-apolitical-lobby-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/?p=4423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cotterell believes that there are very few &#8217;truly apolitical and independent consultants&#8217; in Canberra. Certainly, Lynton Crosby and Mark Textor are closely aligned with the Liberal Party. The usual approach, however, is bipartisanship. Jackson Wells, Government Relations Australia, Parker and Partners and others all have people from both sides of politcs on their rosters. I guess [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cotterell believes that there are very few &#8217;truly apolitical and independent consultants&#8217; in Canberra. Certainly, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynton_Crosby">Lynton Crosby </a>and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Textor">Mark Textor</a> are closely aligned with the Liberal Party. The usual approach, however, is bipartisanship. <a href="http://jacksonwells.com.au/">Jackson Wells</a>, <a href="http://www.govrel.com.au/">Government Relations Australia</a>, <a href="http://www.p-p.com.au/home.asp">Parker and Partners</a> and others all have people from both sides of politcs on their rosters. I guess Jannette&#8217;s &#8216;apolitical&#8217; firm will have people with no links with either side. Usually, the links are also your bona fides as an insider. Janette is definitely a skilled professional and a Canberra insider. But if her business prospers will she be able to recruit insiders with no political affiliations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/trevorcook/2008/10/10/cotterell-leaves-crosby-textor-to-establish-apolitical-lobby-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
