A bill has been introduced into the Senate that would restrict interactions between the pharmaceutical industry and the medical profession.

Most of the submissions to a Senate committee inquiry into the proposals have come from industry.

In the article below, Dr Ken Harvey, adjunct associate professor at La Trobe University, urges concerned members of the public and health professionals to attend a public hearing on the bill in Melbourne on Monday.

The Therapeutic Goods Amendment  (Pharmaceutical Transparency)Bill 2013 has been introduced by the health spokesperson for the Greens, Senator Richard Di Natale.


Industry views are dominating the debate

Ken Harvey writes:

On Monday April 29, 2013 the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration is holding a public hearing on this bill, in Melbourne, from 9:00 am to 12:45 am, at the Mantra Hotel, Conference Room 1, 222 Russell St, Melbourne.

The bill proposes to replace Medicines Australia self-regulatory code with legislation that sets more stringent restrictions on the interactions between pharmaceutical companies and physicians that minimises the opportunity to provide inducements and thereby unduly influence prescribing behaviours.

The bill forbids payment for doctors to travel or attend education seminars and scientific conferences domestically and overseas, bans the sponsorship of educational meetings intended for Australian doctors outside Australia, limits gifts and overly lavish hospitality, and requires full reporting of any fees paid to prescribers outside the company.

The terms of reference for the inquiry are ‘to receive evidence on the need for regulation of pharmaceutical industry conduct with regards to interactions with the medical profession, and the appropriateness of the provisions in the bill that place restrictions on these interactions’.

The majority of the 24 submissions now posted oppose the bill and support industry self-regulation (4 Industry associations, 13 pharmaceutical companies and Sydney University).

One health professional and 1 consumer organisation support the bill (the latter also wants it broadened to include all health professionals and all therapeutic goods companies). Two health professionals have pointed out the limitations, both of the bill and self-regulation, and asked for broader debate about different models of ensuring ethical relationships between health professionals and therapeutic goods companies.

A late submission from the Department of Health and Ageing reiterates the government’s preference for self-regulation but fails to address its limitations.

See: http://tinyurl.com/cte75rh












Observers attending, are asked to advise their names and designations to Christine McDonald, Secretary, FPA Committee (SEN):  FPA.SEN AT aph.gov.au.


(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)