While the focus now is rightly on the communities at immediate risk from bushfires in New South Wales, those massive clouds of smoke that have hung over Sydney and elsewhere over the past week pose other health risks, say Martine Dennekamp and Fay Johnston from the Centre for Air Quality and Health Research and Evaluation.

Their research shows that around 340,000 premature deaths around the world each year can be attributed to smoke from ‘landscape fires’.  They say deaths and hospital admissions from lung problems have risen on days when severe smoke plumes affect Sydney’s air quality, and there is evidence of higher risk of cardiac arrests on bushfire-affected days in Melbourne.

In this article for The Conversation, they outline the risks – particularly for people with pre-existing heart or lung disease, pregnant women, young children, and the elderly –  and offer advice on what people can take to reduce their current exposure to bushfire smoke.


Martine Dennekamp and Fay Johnston write:

In recent days, we’ve seen dramatic pictures of thick smoke from bushfires hanging over Sydney. Our first thoughts are with people living in the immediate vicinity of the fires, and the threat to their lives and properties. But there’s another matter that affects a lot more people, and that is the health effect of bushfire smoke.

As bushfire smoke can cover very large areas, including major cities, it has the potential to affect millions of people and is a significant public health problem.

What we know

We know that healthy people tolerate brief episodes of smoke exposure quite well, but those with pre-existing heart or lung disease, pregnant women, young children, and the elderly are more likely to be affected by smoke.

Smoke consists of a very complex mixture of particles and gases, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds. And increased concentrations of the secondary pollutant ozone have been noted during large fires.

On the population level, the major concern is the very small particles or PM2.5 – particles with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 micrometres (µm) – that can penetrate deep into the lungs. These small particles in urban air have shown to have an effect on respiratory and cardiovascular health, even at concentrations well below the current air quality standards in Australia.

This naturally poses the question of what their health effects could be during bushfires, when their concentrations are many times higher and regularly exceed the air quality standards.

At a global scale, our team has estimated that around 340,000 premature deaths each year can be attributed to smoke from landscape fires. We have previously shown that on days when severe smoke plumes affected Sydney’s air quality, deaths increased by around 5% and hospital admissions for lung problems increased even more.

In Melbourne, we have shown that the risk of having a cardiac arrest was significantly increased on bushfire-affected days.

The studies of health effects of bushfires have usually focused on outcomes that can be obtained from routine data collections after a bushfire, simply because they are difficult to predict in advance. As a result, most research has focused on emergency presentations and hospital admissions.

But these outcomes are likely just the tip of the “health effects iceberg”. We need to look at other health outcomes, including the impact of bushfires on individuals, to properly advise policy makers and clinicians of appropriate public health messages and measures to put in place.

In the meanwhile, there are some things you can do to mitigate the impact of bushfire smoke.

What you could do

If you are in an area affected by smoke and fall in one of the higher risk categories, that is, you have a current heart or lung condition, are elderly, pregnant, or have young children, it’s advisable to try and minimise your exposure to smoke the best you can.

There are several measures that you can take to reduce your exposure to the bushfire smoke.

  • If the pollution is severe in your local area, people at particularly high risk should consider the practicalities of leaving the affected area until the air quality has improved.
  • Stay indoors and close windows and doors. If you have a well-sealed house this can delay the entry of smoke particles into your home, but it is only a temporary measure and completely depends on the structure of the house. If the house is not well sealed, smoke particles indoors will rapidly equilibrate with outdoor levels.
  • Avoid exercise, as this results in faster and deeper breathing and can increase your exposure to smoke up to tenfold.
  • If you have an air conditioner, set it to recycle so you don’t bring in outdoor air. If you have the option of adding a filter to your air conditioner, do so.
  • The best evidence for reducing personal exposure comes from the use of high efficiency particle air filters (HEPA filters). These have shown to significantly reduce particle concentrations indoors when there’s a high level of fire smoke.
  • If you feel the air in your home is getting uncomfortable, consider moving (even for a short period of time) to a cleaner, air conditioned environment like a shopping centre.

Apart from reducing your exposure to smoke, it’s important if you have a heart or lung condition that you have your medication and follow your treatment plan. People with asthma, for instance, should make sure they have a current asthma action plan and keep their blue reliever medication handy.

Exposure to bushfire smoke, either through planned burns or incidental bushfires, will always be a part of Australian life. We need to ensure that we are as prepared as we can be when such fires happen.

Martine Dennekamp is occupational and environmental epidemiologist at Monash University.

Fay Johnston is Senior Research Fellow in Environmental Epidemiology at the Menzies Research Institute Tasmania at University of Tasmania.

They are both researchers with the Centre for Air Quality and Health Research and Evaluation, a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence. Fay Johnston receives funding from the ARC, NHMRC, Bushfire CRC, and from fire management and environment agencies in NSW and Victoria.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. A reminder to Croakey readers that TC articles are freely available for republishing under a Creative Commons licence.

(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)