Apr 19, 2011

Miles Franklin 2011: the short shortlist

Just in. The books shortlisted for the 2011 Miles Franklin Literary Award are: Bereft

Just in. The books shortlisted for the 2011 Miles Franklin Literary Award are:

Bereft by Chris Womersley
That Deadman Dance by Kim Scott
When Colts Ran by Roger McDonald

Of course, the comment has begun (on Twitter) about the fact that there are only three books. Martin Shaw says (@thebooksdesk) ‘A shortlist of 3 becomes a bit of a damning take on the longlist to me – as if the other 6 were just chosen for some local colour!’ I wasn’t at the announcement and the press release hasn’t found it’s way into my inbox yet but Jennifer Byrne from the First Tuesday Book Club (@tuesdaybookclub) tweeted that the judges said, regarding the shortlist of three, ‘they had read lots of books that were not ready for publication and lacked great editing…’ She also reported that the judges said ‘Australian voice’ was the most striking feature of the books nominated.

And of course, they’re all dudes (as in 2009). Roger McDonald and Kim Scott are also former winners.

I haven’t read all three of these, but I’m sure they’re good, quality reads. Chris Womersley’s Bereft certainly is, and I’ll put my money on that. I’m keen to read That Deadman Dance too. But isn’t it striking that Australian life, according to the Miles Franklin judges, is still represented by the past and the outback, and is written in a male voice. Sheep stations, war, colonisation. Like I said, I’m sure the books are good, but I feel the award continues to narrowly define ‘Australian life’ – and the longlist certainly does feel a bit like a cop out. When you look at the final three you feel like those other books never had a chance.


I’m sorry this is rough, wanted to get it out quick. I’ll update with some official comments from the judges or links later.


The official comments are up on the Trust website now. See here. The judges say: ‘These shortlisted books have a distinctive, indelible Australian voice. It’s a voice that has nothing to do with reflex nationalism, or jingoism – rather the reverse. The shortlisted books this year are like barometers of the state of our culture: they take the readings, and give them back to us in fiction of extraordinary accomplishment. They force us to look again at ourselves, and to think – hard.’

And here’s some comments on the individual novels:

On Bereft: ‘This is a beautifully written book, spare and compelling. The tragedy and bleakness of the story are, at times, almost unbearable but Womersley’s fine prose and narrative intensity make Bereft unforgettable.’

On That Deadman Dance: ‘That Deadman Dance is alive in the spaces between these two worlds as they collide and collaborate. It tells the story of the rapid destruction of Noongar people and their traditions. At the same time, there is the enchanting possibility of the birth of a new world in the strange song, dance, ceremony and language that are produced by these encounters of very different peoples.’

On When Colts Ran: ‘When Colts Ran, with its cavalcade of flawed, rough cut Australian characters, illustrates poignantly the way the optimism and confidence of rural Australia in the middle of the twentieth century slipped away and how family experience, class and social expectation shaped communities. Roger McDonald evokes that world with an inwardness and poetic verve that is extraordinary.’

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)


Leave a comment

11 thoughts on “Miles Franklin 2011: the short shortlist

  1. When Colts Ran, by Roger McDonald « ANZ LitLovers LitBlog

    […] fuss and bother about the female perspective not featuring in the Miles Franklin shortlist and Angela Meyer (who’s only read Bereft ) claims that ‘Australian life, according to the Miles Franklin […]

  2. Is it a man’s world, literally? – ABC Online |

    […] for rushing out poorly edited worksSydney Morning HeraldNo women on Miles Franklin short-listThe AgeMiles Franklin 2011: the short shortlistCrikey […]

  3. troym7

    When the longlist was released, I did what I usually do: I tried to get copies of each, locally. For the last three or so years, it has been getting harder and harder. is brilliant, but for me walking through a bookshop holds a deeper connection. Sadly, plenty of Dan Brown novels, a lack of ‘Australian’ novels (and what a vague and exclusive term that is). Is the Miles Franklin relevant? It is an act of exclusion, much like Australian history? I see something like the Children’s Book Council awards for older readers as much more inclusive, a celebration of the written word.

  4. The Australian Voice in Fiction: What is it? What should it be? « Bite The Book – Book Reviews and Industry Views

    […] According to judges’ comments about this year’s Miles Franklin shortlist the Australian …. I dispute and reject all three of these suppositions. While Australia’s past is very important I do not think it best represents what it is to be Australian nor what Australia means today. ‘The Outback’ also has little to no resonance for the majority of Australians today and I don’t think I even need to make an argument against the third, ridiculous claim about the Australian voice being male although I will point out the award is named after a woman not a man. […]

  5. Past winners make Miles Franklin shortlist – ABC Online |

    […] for Australia's most prestigious award for a work of fiction – and an all-male …Miles Franklin 2011: the short shortlistCrikey (blog)Miles Franklin shortlist revealedThe West […]

  6. Miles Franklin shortlist « Fancy Goods

    […] year’s list has also attracted attention. See Angela Myer’s Literary Minded blog for more on the controversy. No […]

  7. jennifer mills – blog › another story from the bush

    […] rural australian voices and gender bias, which we all start talking about whenever there is an award. i have a few thoughts on the issue, having recently written what is really a very masculine book […]

  8. Benjamin Solah

    I haven’t read the novels, so wouldn’t have known, but Bereft does sound interesting. It seems the main issue then is the exclusion of women.

  9. Miles Franklin Brouhaha |

    […] a comprehensive and updating run-down of said ‘brouhaha’ check out Angela Meyer’s post, which will also no doubt generate some decent discussion in its comment […]

  10. Angela Meyer

    Genre doesn’t really suit the MF as it must be a ‘published novel or play portraying Australian life in any of its phases’ according to Miles Franklin’s will. So anything fantastical or set in the future would be difficult to justify under these terms.

    But while we’re broadly commenting on the Miles Franklin judges’ definition of ‘Australian life’, it should be noted that Kim Scott is an Indigenous author, and that Chris Womersley’s Bereft (the only one I can comment on as I’ve read it) does not in any way ‘glorify the nation’. In fact, it’s a moody, gothic story which feels as though it is more influenced by murder ballad songs, than any ‘Australiana’-type fiction.

    It’s just very interesting to compare the shortlisted books to the longlisted ones and wonder if the separation was purely about quality.

  11. Benjamin Solah

    I really agree with you on how problematic it is that Australian literature seems to be defined as male, and very Australiana – which is always what turned me off reading Australian literature and made me search out for other stuff. I like the migrant voice, the female voice, even the anti-Australiana voice that doesn’t glorify the nation, just tells it as it is.

    Also wishing there was more genre, but that’s a problem with awards worldwide, that genre novels seem to only win genre awards

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details