While easyJet mightn't be top of mind for travellers in this part of the world, an awkward incident being reported in the UK
raises the very conflict many Australian travellers are complaining about when it comes to small seats versus people who grow larger by the generation.
There are several clear sides to this issue, none of them wrong, but definitely in conflict.
One is the popularity of very low fares, such as those that are part of the attractiveness of successful low cost carriers like easyJet. (The other part is time saving, since many LCCs eschew hubs and link useful points non-stop.)
Another is the growth in air travel that the likes of easyJet give rise to, creating jobs in air transport, and enabling what have become enormous high volume flows of people making ultra safe journeys where the biggest risk of death or injury is by far, driving to the airport, or from it, in an unfamiliar car on the 'other' side of the road. Or just being robbed by Sydney Airport in the car park, but I digress....
And as far as this long lived observer of transport goes, a further dimension is the inevitable conflict between certification limits on one hand and nutrition on the other, which is not the same as obesity which might be best left to a different forum.
The airlines will tend to pack as many people as they are legally allowed to by the type rules into any aircraft over time, not just to lower unit costs however measured, but to fit in the shifts to higher usages of flying with the lower quality expectations that are a function of a closed loop between lower fares and higher demand.
Or for the large, an 'unvirtuous circle.'
All of which came together the other morning for passengers on an easyJet flight from Liverpool to Geneva which came in 300 kilograms over its maximum takeoff weight limit for that rather short runway and rather short flight, even though it was damn cold, which is what jet engines like it to be.
The stories quote passengers saying there was an unofficial whip around to raise compensation cash for the four passengers off loaded onto other flights because the £100 payable by easyJet was unfair. It sounds like they may have been given £300 in total, £200 of which was from the other passengers, but from here, we just don't know.
What we can say is that at the equivalent of $A 480, £300 would in recent days have left you with change from a full service return flight between Sydney and Auckland on an Emirates A380 seated in Zone One on the ground floor where most A380 operators put first class, or about as much as four sectors for two return trips between Sydney and Melbourne full service on Qantas or Virgin Australia would have cost for a determined bargain hunter.
In other words we have it good, but incidents like the easyJet whip around suggest that a different future is coming to get us, ready or not.