[caption id="attachment_62365" align="aligncenter" width="610"]
Now stick your knees hard against seat back in your face[/caption]
Most media today is covering news in stories like this
that American Airlines, which masquerades as a full service carrier, will screw its economy class passengers even harder when it comes to legroom in the near future.
Of course, the stories aren't for the most part written that way. They are obedient exercises in corporate dictation to a degraded 'traditional' , media sector, and lapped up by social media aggregators who seem clueless and disinterested when it comes publishing context or overviews.
Some of them also leave out the other side of the story, that American will make itself as tight, if not in some rows tighter, than the space available in high profile low cost carriers like Ryanair, in part because of tightness in both discretionary and paid work travel.
American for a very long time, was very generous in economy class legroom, but couldn't see any evidence that this was actually improving financial performance or causing customer loyalty.
In the context of that disappointment, the changes we see in 'legacy' airlines in the US, Europe, Hong Kong and perhaps very soon, Australia, are like attempts to keep tightening the screws until kneecaps start to break, or the customers refuse to take any more discomfort.
It's a management search for the pain barrier.
That is one of the ironies of the media where airlines have succumbed to similar management initiatives as grocery chains, in reducing the actual contents or dimensions of what have been staples, but keep the price the same or even jacked it up after an initial period, on the basis that customers have to buy what they are selling.
The messages coming out of some airlines no longer reflect the defensive attitudes we've seen in the past, apart from bland references to improving 'customer satisfaction.' It's a case of take it or leave it, which is dangerous for the carriers, because if economic circumstances change in say America or Australia, more people might decide to pick up the phone, or just not bother with discretionary bookings.
Where will the trend lead us? There is a view that it will cause more customers to trade up to premium economy, where they might mingle with those executives bumped down from luxury business class cabins by a more ruthless tendency in cost control by corporate account managers.
But will that happen, and can it happen enough to replace the customers fleeing the confines from the tighter economy class environment which in some places, coincides with an unpleasant airport experience driven by security procedures gone bonkers?
As many marketeers have noted over the years, if you want to collect a premium for something, it has to offer a dollop of exclusivity, whether confected or not. There is nothing that might be described as exclusive in a jet in which far more seats are in premium economy or business class than in economy.
The idea of ever larger 'loyalty' clubs taking over more floor space at airports, especially those that are privately owned, is problematical. That space, if leased from the airport, is likely to be more valuable to its owners for retailing activities including car parking, rather than a place where entitled customers can compete for a shortage of celery sticks and seats in a lounge also divided into 'special' rooms.
In the meantime, the difference between declared low cost carriers like Jetstar, TigerAir Australia, Southwest, Ryanair and Germanwings and the 'full service' carriers diminishes toward vanishing point.
How the short term crush-and-charge more approach to air travel plays out as people get larger, and it seems, angrier, remains to be seen. It might not end well.