Menu lock

Federal Election 2013

May 18, 2013

Seat of the week: Fowler

Three years ago, the outer western Sydney seat of Fowler was Labor's third safest in the country. Now it fears it might lose.

Fowler covers an area of Labor’s western Sydney heartland from Lansvale, Liverpool and Cabramatta in the east, through Hinchinbrook and Cecil Hills to undeveloped territory beyond the Westlink. The electorate has the second highest number of non-English speakers of any electorate in the country, ranking in the top ten for persons of Chinese, Vietnamese, Serbian and Croatian extraction. The redistribution ahead of the 2010 election halved its geographic size by exchanging semi-rural territory around Badgerys Creek for urban areas around Liverpool and Lansvale (largely reversing changes made before the 2004 election), boosting the Labor margin by 4.5% and making it their third safest seat in notional terms. It then proceeded to swing more heavily against Labor than any other seat in the country, slashing the margin 22.6% to 8.8% – the first time Labor’s margin had fallen to single figures since the seat’s creation.

Fowler was created with the expansion of parliament in 1984, and held first by Ted Grace until 1998 and then by Julia Irwin until 2010. Chiefly noted as a critic of Israel, Irwin secured the seat with the backing of the old guard of the NSW Right, including Laurie Brereton and Leo McLeay. Irwin twice needed protection to secure her preselection in the past, and there were mixed reports about her likely job security at the 2010 election had she not not opted to retire. In doing so she resolved a headache for the ALP, which had been absorbed by a game of musical chairs resulting from the effective abolition of Laurie Ferguson’s seat of Reid. Ferguson was at first determined to be accommodated in Fowler, but a deal was in force reserving the seat for a Right faction which was also dominant in local branches. He was instead made to settle for Werriwa, displacing Chris Hayes to highly marginal Macarthur.

However, Irwin’s departure gave Hayes, a fellow member of the Right, an immensely more attractive safety net, and also allowed local favourite Nick Bleasdale to unsuccessfully contest Macarthur for a second time. Hayes was a former official with the Right faction Australian Workers Union official who entered parliament at the February 2005 by-election caused by the resignation of Mark Latham. Earlier this week he attained the position of chief government whip, which Hunter MP Joel Fitzgibbon vacated in March after backing Kevin Rudd’s abortive leadership push. The Liberal candidate is Andrew Nguyen (a name he shares with the LNP candidate for Oxley in Queensland), a former Fairfield councillor and long-standing figure in Cabramatta’s Vietnamese community.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

232 comments

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
joe  carli
Guest

I’ve been to several environmental themed workshops this last couple of weeks, and I’ve noticed there is a pattern of proceedure at each of them.

It works like this…: You have the speaker/expert. and you have the audience. The speaker comes to the talk armed with research notes and topic-cred and a kind of bestowed authority. the audience consists of a group of lay-people, strangers to eachother who attend out of interest or social pastime….some too have “on-the-ground” statistics and anecdotal evidence.
So when these two disparate groups meet, there is a kind of “disconnect” rather than a “connect” of interest, the clash between the “collegiate” of professionals who have difficulty accepting any ” on-ground” evidence without acceptable research backing…..and fair enough. On the other hand you have these lay-people who have witnessed with their own eyes, certain events which are sometimes in contradiction to the accepted orthodoxy…so a conflict of interpretation exists between the ‘collegiate” of insiders and the “Fellowship” of observers. Usually, the lay-people give ground out of (sometimes misguided) respect for the credentials of the expert…..but still retain a degree of suspicion that lays dormant till more convincing evidence is forthcoming…after all one has to believe what one sees with one’s own eyes!
This, I believe is what is being played out with what BB. over at “The Pub” calls the “Pundits” of commentators….THEY have what they believe to be almost “scientific evidence” of “the good oil” on the reasons for political maneuvering gleaned from the motivations and reactions of an inside core of players…whereas WE, out in the electorate are actually seeing the “on-the-ground” reactions of those most affected by such plays.
Who to believe?…..I think, in the end, it will be how much “brass-in-pocket” the individual has that affects the majority of voters….and with the Opp’n policies just now being brought to the fore and even then they are very vague…by the time of the real election cycle, it will be a case of put up or shut where not only the pundits, but the voters will be able to judge the reality for themselves, that the wheat will be quickly sorted from the chaff!

Thomas. Paine.
Guest

[I prefer to think of it as only four months to wait until the fraud that Abbott and the Liberals have been playing on the Australian people begins to be revealed. Then we will see if all the lies and deception were really worth it.]

One of the greatest problems facing Gillard/Swan in an election campaign when trying to run the line that Abbott and co are full of lies and deception is that the public paint Gillard with exactly those characteristics.

Abbott can run exactly the same campaign and make it hurt more since it reinforces public perceptions of Gillard’s history.

He can run the no carbon tax line, the surplus line, the backstabbing of Rudd line…and it hurts because they already don’t like her.

The public have known Abbott for ages, he has been in the prominent public eye for a decade, they know what he is like, they discount it much more than they will with Gillard.

Gillard has been and is Labor’s poison challice.

This silly line that the public will wake up during an election campaign and ditch Abbott is exactly the same thing Abbott said about Rudd, that the public were sleep walking.

And the most scary thing is that an election campaign is going to hurt Gillard more than Abbott. All they have to do is replay Swan, Gillard and the lot of them slagging the day lights out of Rudd….do you know awful that has and will make Labor look to the public. In fact Abbott need do no more than replay Gillard’s line of a govt that has lost its way…and the subsequent slagging of Rudd by various Gillard MPs.

There could be a widening not a narrowing during the campaign. 54/46 could easily become 56/44

Bushfire Bill
Guest

[In my opinion, this government is the worst ever, and Swan and Gillard’s lie over the surplus is unforgivable.]

You sound like a Coalition laboratory rat who’s been sprung from the cage.

No swing voter says things like that.

Rabids, yes… swingers, no.

This little black duck
Guest
This little black duck

Darn,

It’s not “in deep trouble”. The RBA is watching the money side and Treasury and Swannie are checking the fiscal. We are in the very best of hands.

I’m pissed as a newt (sorry, sober newts) and leave you with http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f5cR6JpRCnM

Darn
Guest

[This little black duck
Posted Saturday, May 18, 2013 at 11:46 pm | Permalink
The short version is that the Australian economy is in deep trouble

Excuse me?

You may wish to have chat to briefly.

There are negative elements that we have to faced up to and the government is providing the delicate balance that will keep job growth and not spook the agencies.]

TLBD

The way I have been interpreting what briefly has been saying – and I have been following his comments very closely because he obviously knows what he is talking about – is that the Labour government has done remarkably well in dealing with the tricky hand it was dealt by the GFC. But there are major contradictions in the Australian economy that have not yet been addressed and the ideological policies of the Liberals, if they are elected, will only serve to make them a lot worse, not better.

castle
Guest

[Libs increasing GST, killing super.]

The libs hate super for the workers, Abbott calls it a con job but had no problems with Howards $300,000 super gift to the rich.

As Keating pointed out if the libs had not killed off his planned super increase from 9% to 15% there would now be $2 trillion in super funds instead of $1.3 trillion.

The libs crow about creating a $50 billion future fund from a $300 billion revenue windfall.

Thats not a future fund as mick would say, $1.3 trillion is a future fund.

GhostWhoVotes
Guest
This little black duck
Guest
This little black duck

[I thought liberal states suppose to fix things?]
They are: the fix is in.

zoidlord
Guest

@Mod Lib/218

I thought liberal states suppose to fix things?

Or are you saying that they are not ?

Tom the first and best
Guest
Tom the first and best

214

“Peak Abbott” is the point where Abbott`s reaches its highest point and then declines. It is the hope of those (including myself) who wish Abbott to loose, that he peaks and declines before the election, but not soon enough to be replaced, and thus looses the election.

This little black duck
Guest
This little black duck

[The short version is that the Australian economy is in deep trouble]
Excuse me?

You may wish to have chat to briefly.

There are negative elements that we have to faced up to and the government is providing the delicate balance that will keep job growth and not spook the agencies.

Utopia
Guest

Does the ALP carry any blame for that state of affairs in your view Darn?

Henry
Guest

Yep, game on puff.
Hopefully people will soon start to wake up to this idiot.

Darn
Guest

Sorry. Should have addressed my 214 to Mod Lib.

This little black duck
Guest
This little black duck

That was 400M, D’oh!

Darn
Guest

I didn’t say anything about “peak Abbott”. I’ve never understood or used the term.

If you genuinely want to understand what the “poison Chalice” is you will need to go back and read what briefly has been saying for the past couple of weeks. The short version is that the Australian economy is in deep trouble and the policies of the Liberals will only make it worse not better. But if you want the detail – and there’s been plenty of it – you will need to go back to the source.

This little black duck
Guest
This little black duck

Henry,

The $400k was the legopener. Very careless, Peta!

Henry
Guest

wall to wall coalition negativity on the news i saw tonight. Libs increasing GST, killing super.
Looks like by opening his mouth Abbott has exposed himself.
Good, labor well and truly still in this.

wpDiscuz