David Braue

Aug 16, 2011

Gillard government fails to provide students with magical computers that don’t age

Yesterday's Age featured a tab

Yesterday’s Age featured a tabloidy little beat-up about “Rudd’s Laptops”, where they’ve gone and interviewed students about the 2009 laptops and found that, surprisingly, they’re not all that zippy in 2011:

“They’re not the best laptops in the world,” [the year 10 student we spoke to] says. “They’re slow and small, and I notice they have these really good and expensive programs on them – but some are so slow that it’s hard to use them because the laptop can hardly run them. If we have to do photo editing, most kids would just use one of the computers at school rather than the laptops.”

Who knew that computers aged so fast? And that laptops might be small (or that that might be an actual selling point of the things)?

And what’s with the compromise, buying students workable laptops but not cutting-edge ones that would double or triple the cost of the program and that would age at the same rate?

Clearly, until computers stop advancing so quickly, the education system has no business in providing them to students. I blame Kevin Rudd for Moore’s Law.

Still, kudos to writer Ben Braue. This is exactly the kind of important scoop that I’d expect to see in The Herald Sun. Good work getting there first, Ben.

(Visited 52 times, 1 visits today)

35 comments

Join the conversation

The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login or sign up for a FREE trial to engage in the commentary.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...