How cruel an irony it is that in order to illustrate an article about Pippa Middleton being harassed by paparazzi, many newspaper and website editors have to buy photos by those very same paparazzi.
What else are they to do? Use a shot Pippa consented to have taken? Use a photograph of the paparazzi themselves instead of their target?
Clearly posed in a studio close up with Middleton’s consent. Doesn’t look at all like a long shot by paparazzi beside something blurred out to the right of the photograph as Pippa was doing something provocatively newsworthy like walking down the street and looking to the side.
I wonder if the precious website hits make their sad duty easier to bear.