Nov 17, 2009

Misleading Parliament: care factor?

Malcolm Turnbull, it seems, just can't help himself.  After Question Time yesterday - immediately after -  he called a press conference to accuse the Prime Minister of misleading Parl

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Malcolm Turnbull, it seems, just can't help himself.  After Question Time yesterday - immediately after -  he called a press conference to accuse the Prime Minister of misleading Parliament over whether the Oceanic Viking deal was "preferential treatment". You'd think, after THAT business earlier in the year, that Turnbull, or one of his staff, would have thought to themselves that renewing the claim of misleading Parliament was something, generally, to be avoided.  But Turnbull, as always, seems to have some difficulty with his impulse control. The direct result was that it gave Rudd an excuse to duck the genuine question of whether the deal really was preferential.  Each time he was asked about the Oceanic Viking today - Question Time began moments after it was revealed the stand-off had ended - he circled back to the accusation of misleading Parliament. It's a minor matter.  It's obviously not remotely on the scale of the Grech business, for example. And yet it confirms again what senior Liberals have said about Turnbull - he's brilliant but too inclined to brainsnaps and misjudgements. The broader point, though, is: who cares anymore about misleading Parliament?  Do voters care?  Does anyone outside Parliament and the Press Gallery?  Given the way in which Question Time has devolved into a cross between a particularly dire amateur theatre performance and your most boring Economics 1 lecturer's greatest hits, does the whole supposed sanctity of telling the truth in Parliament mean anything any more? John Howard didn't resign after being forced to admit he misled Parliament about his meetings with Dick Honan in 2002. That was an open-and-shut case of misleading Parliament, but hardly the grounds on which any Prime Minister should have had to end their career. On the other hand, remove Parliamentary accountability and one of the critical bulwarks of accountable government is ostensibly lost.  The right of Parliamentary privilege also surely is accompanied by the responsibility of truth-telling.  And yet those notions look curiously old-fashioned in an era when the truth is only one available narrative, and not necessarily to be regarded as any more useful than others that may be available. This is not to say that all politicians are liars. Some are.  But the good ones don't lie - they merely provide those parts of the truth most convenient.  Good politicians live in the margin of uncertainty between truth and deception, generally preferring not to be pinned down with too much detail unless it serves their purposes.  Misleading Parliament is a quaint concept for such practitioners.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Misleading Parliament: care factor?

  1. 2 tanners

    @Bullmore’s ghost

    (shocked expression) Lying to us is one thing, but now we are talking about lying to each other! that’s just not cricket!

  2. Bullmore's Ghost

    I simply assume that all successful politicians are accomplished liars, so why would I be surprised if they lied to parliament.

  3. Bogdanovist

    Don’t worry CliffG, there is a host of next Gen talent in the Liberal party, such as, ummm.. err… Peter Dutton!

    But seriously, Rudd showed that a cleanskin with zero charisma can come out of nowhere and win if the time is right. Someday the time will be right for the Liberals and some lucky sod will be sitting in the chair when the music stops. The question is how long that will take.

  4. CliffG

    TurnBULL simply cannot stop being a lawyer. Your honour this! …Your honour that! …Not bothered by whether something is true or not. Just the show, the stance and the performance. No substance!
    But after Howard kept the lid on everyone for so long who else is there?

  5. Cuppa

    He’s so full of bile and envy that he runs around in effect calling the Prime Minister of Australia a liar. He displays a most un-Prime Ministerial character. If there’s any justice voters will intuit this and give him and his wretched Coalition a wide berth.

  6. shepherdmarilyn

    Turnbull always have to go one step too far. But did you see the brilliant SBS doco. The Trial.

    Rudd made a mistake, whether or not it was an honest one I don’t know but it appears he used the 255 Tamils on their boat to send a message to those non-existent people smugglers.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details