Menu lock

Infrastructure

May 8, 2010

Why did the NYC road pricing proposal fail?

The key message is that gaining support for pricing proposals requires more than showing the social benefits – it is necessary to persuade individual motorists they will be better o

This paper is an object lesson in the pitfalls of attempting to introduce cordon pricing. Written by Bruce Schaller from the New York City Department of Transportation, it analyses Mayor Bloomberg’s failed 2007 congestion pricing proposal (it was ultimately blocked by the State legislature).

Opposing views on congestion charging (click to enlarge)

The key message is that gaining support for pricing proposals requires more than showing the social benefits – it is necessary to persuade individual motorists they will be better off. The New York experience shows small groups can have great influence – only 5% of workers would have paid the toll.

The author also argues that the best prospects for successfully implementing road pricing lie in initiatives like High Occupancy Toll lanes (see my previous post on this topic in relation to Melbourne) as motorists are less likely to feel they will be disadvantaged.

This table is a neat summary of the key views of proponents and opponents.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

3 comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “Why did the NYC road pricing proposal fail?

  1. We urgently need a national discussion about pricing roads | The Urbanist

    […] another day. In the meantime, here’s some aspects of that issue I’ve discussed before (here). Comment (1) | […]

  2. – Do we want cars in the city centre? « The Melbourne Urbanist

    […] form it took, road pricing would not be easy to introduce. It would necessarily require additional public transport capacity in the form of more […]

  3. How to pay for public transport? « The Melbourne Urbanist

    […] A comprehensive road pricing scheme that extracts the full cost of private travel would provide some of that revenue. The real value of congestion pricing lies in giving priority to high value trips but using the revenue for a transport-related purpose is almost certainly a prerequisite for obtaining public acceptance (see here). […]