Jul 9, 2012

Did students cycle to school back in the day?

As is often the case in any discussion about cycling in Australia, there are numerous references to "the good old days" when cycling rates were much higher than they are now. The tr

Alan Davies — Editor of The Urbanist

Alan Davies

Editor of The Urbanist

How secondary students in Melbourne travelled to school in 1987 vs 2009

As is often the case in any discussion about cycling in Australia, there are numerous references to “the good old days” when cycling rates were much higher than they are now. The trouble is reliable data on historical cycling levels is hard to find.

I noted recently that only about two to three percent of secondary students cycle to school in Melbourne at present. Thanks to Alan Parker, I now have access to a paper he wrote for the magazine Freewheeling in 1988 summarising a major study of journey-to-school patterns in Melbourne in 1987.

According to Mr Parker’s paper, the study was undertaken by the Ministry of Transport and involved surveying 220,000 students at 420 high schools. They’re very large numbers but unfortunately I don’t have the original study, so I can’t be sure how reliable the data is.

There are many ways the survey could be biased. For example, schools where cycling was actively promoted might have been more diligent in encouraging students to respond. Conversely, some schools with large numbers of cyclists might’ve had uninterested staff and/or students. Accordingly, it’s best to treat the numbers as indicative.

I’ve compared the overall counts by mode with the more recent ones from the VISTA survey (see exhibit – treat these as approximate, as I had to eyeball the ’87 numbers off a graph). What really stands out is the size of the increase in the proportion of high school students who travelled by car.

That increase was at the expense of all other modes, but cycling took the biggest hit. Back in 1987, around 10% of secondary students cycled compared to 2.7% today.

What’s also interesting is more than three times as many boys cycled as girls. I don’t have the split by sex for 2009 but I expect the gaps narrowed appreciably.

The numbers for 1987 are for the journey to school. Many students were driven to school by parents on their way to work in the morning. On the journey home however, the proportion who were driven was much lower (about 16%), while the proportion using public transport exceeded 50%.

I expect there’s a similar asymmetry in the 2009 data too (although I haven’t done that analysis). It’s an important distinction to bear in mind when considering this issue. It’s likely that the higher rates of car ownership and women’s participation in the workforce were key factors driving the increase in morning car use.

Perhaps the most interesting finding is the variability in rates of cycling between schools. Mr Parker only shows differences between municipalities (rather than schools) but there are nevertheless some extraordinarily large divergences.

For example, more than 20% of students attending bayside secondary schools travelled by bicycle. In the old Sandringham municipality the proportion was 48%.

On the other hand, less than 5% of students attending school in inner city and inner suburban municipalities like Footscray, Northcote, Fitzroy, Richmond, Hawthorne and Camberwell cycled to school (Alan Parker has more detail here).

A similar high degree of variability between schools was noted by Smith and Milthorpe in three surveys of cycling conducted in NSW in 1991, 1992 and 1993. They noted some Sydney schools had negligible ridership in all three surveys (pre and post introduction of mandatory helmet law):

Riding is discouraged and even forbidden by some school principals and in other places school location makes cycling particularly hazardous and hence it is probably unattractive to children and discouraged by parents.

There are a number of possible explanations for the variability, including density of schools, availability of public transport, school policies, traffic levels, and so on. Thus it’s not surprising there are large differences in peoples recollections of how much cycling to high school there was back in their day.

This is reinforced by another interesting finding from the 1987 Melbourne survey. Students who attended private secondary schools were much more likely to use public transport and car than State high school students, reflecting their longer average trip distances. Conversely, they were much less likely to cycle or walk.

Whereas circa 38% of State secondary students walked or cycled to school  in 1987, the corresponding figure for private secondary students was around 9%. That suggests the increase in private school enrolments over the last 25 years could be a key reason for the decline in non-motorised school travel by students.

The fact that the relatively affluent sand-belt suburbs also displayed the highest levels of cycling in 1987 is consistent with that hypothesis.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 thoughts on “Did students cycle to school back in the day?

  1. pugsley

    Don’t know about 1987, but back in the ‘fifties a majority would cycle or walk, a few would take the ‘bus and close to zero would get a lift from mum.

    pugsley: Agree. The 60s too. I’d say girls were (relatively) less inclined to cycle then than they are today. AD

  2. Nik Dow

    Of course, helmet law would have had nothing to do with the decline in numbers. Wasn’t it teenagers that showed the biggest decline when the laws came in? Just a coincidence probably.

    Nik Dow: I too expect the MHL is part of the explanation for the drop. The MHL had a minor effect on adults in the first year or two after it was introduced but, as you say, a big impact on high school students. It’s not the only likely suspect explaining a drop over a 25 year period though, and not necessarily the most significant one either. AD

  3. SBH

    Dudley, I don’t think that can be the reason. There is a hill in Northcote but it’s easy enough to avoid. Especially on the way to school at the bottom of the hill. And there is an excellent and well used path with good connections right outside the school. There must be some other reason and my guess would be traffic.

  4. Dudley Horscroft

    Suggest you consider topography in your list of possible explanations. I would think that Bayside Melbourne tends to be a lot flatter than Northcote, Hawthorne and Camberwell.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details