Cars & traffic

Feb 16, 2017

Is it time for a 40 kmh speed limit in cities?

It won't be easy politically, but living with cars in Australia's cities means "taming" them, starting with setting a default 40 kmh speed limit

Alan Davies — Editor of The Urbanist

Alan Davies

Editor of The Urbanist

How about setting the speed limit to 40 kmh on the white roads and 50 kmh on the light brown ones (excluding motorways and CBD)? Inner northern suburbs, Melbourne

I made the point recently that cars will almost certainly be the majority mode in Australian capital cities for a long time to come; so politicians and lobbyists needs to start actively managing private transport rather than hoping it will magically go away (see Can we have a mature discussion about the future of urban transport?).

I identified a range of possible actions to “tame” private transport, including higher fuel efficiency standards, congestion pricing, and revised penalty and enforcement regimes. This time I want to look more closely at one of those actions; substantially lower speed limits.

Here’s a simple proposal; reduce the speed limit to 50 kmh on urban arterial roads and 40 kmh on all others, starting with the inner suburbs. The exhibit indicates how this might work in inner Melbourne. It shows the region within 10 km due west, north and east of Melbourne Town Hall. The light brown roads outside the CBD – the arterials – would be subject to a maximum speed of 50 kmh at all times. The white roads, plus all CBD streets, would have a maximum speed of 40 kmh at all times. The dark brown roads – the motorways – would be unchanged.

Why do it? Lower maximum speeds will improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists; the risk of a pedestrian dying if struck by a car travelling at 40 kmh is around half of that for a car doing 50 kmh and a third for a car doing 60 kmh. A slower maximum speed would improve the amenity of neighbouring land uses, promote roadside activity, and reduce pollution and emissions. It would also simplify the rules by eliminating the need for special speed zones around schools and in strip shopping centres.

A very high proportion of the streets in Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs are lined with dwellings and businesses that generate pedestrian activity. Many are narrow and carry much more traffic than they were originally designed for, especially east-west streets. There’s lots of building activity in this region and densities are increasing. The profile of the population is changing too; residents like the public realm. They like to get “out and about” and ride bicycles.

This is not an outlandish idea. The Heart Foundation (SA) says there are plenty of precedents:

In South Australia, the speed limit around some schools has been set to 25 km/h in recognition of pedestrian vulnerability. In Unley, a 40 km/h limit on all local streets has been in place since 1999 as well as in numerous other suburbs in Adelaide such as Bowden/ Brompton and North Haven. In some Melbourne suburbs and also on main roads through shopping precincts a 40 km/h speed limit has been applied. Brisbane CBD is now a 40 km/h zone. European cities such as Sweden, Germany and Britain are implementing 30 km/h speed limits on residential and shopping strips as world’s best practice.

The key downside is slower speeds and the consequent economic loss in passenger and freight travel time. It’s a real issue but I think the scale of loss would be small. While cars, buses, trams and trucks can go fast for short periods, average speeds by road are considerably lower than the current maximum even in the interpeak and evening periods. These are inner suburban streets where drivers deal with many intersections, traffic lights, parked cars, and others vehicles competing for the same road space. Many strip shopping centres in this region already have 24 hr 40 kmh limits.

The findings of a Monash Accident Research Unit project support this view. Archer et al concluded that a reduction in average travel speed brought about by reducing urban speed limits is only likely to have a marginal impact on travel time:

Research tends to support this notion given that average speeds are influenced by many other factors including driver attitudes and preferences; roadway design; forms of traffic regulation at intersections; and prevailing traffic conditions (levels of congestion; weather; etc). Research studies in Australia in relation to the then proposed reduction of the default urban speed limit from 60 to 50 km/h, indicated only minimal impact on individual travel times and large benefits to society as a result of the reduction in crash trauma.

We shouldn’t be shy about modestly slower average speeds for cars, trucks and buses. Public transport is substantially slower end-to-end for the great majority of trips than private transport, yet governments are investing in improvements because it has social advantages (see What’s government done to make public transport better?). We should use the same logic to justify lower speed limits for roads i.e. the amenity, safety and environmental benefits of slower traffic are likely to exceed the time costs. In any event, the biggest time losses would be in the evenings when on average the value of travellers’ time is relatively low. There’s also an argument that the value of travel time might be significantly over-stated in transport analysis.

Getting the maximum benefit would require strong enforcement and penalties that incentivise appropriate behaviour. Inevitably though, the full benefits will only be realised if governments build traffic calming works. There’s an opportunity here for the Federal government to give substance to its cities policies by establishing a flagship multi-billion dollar fund to build traffic calming works in partnership with state and local governments.

Yes, a 40/50 kmh limit would be very difficult politically. It might be necessary to start with a smaller area – say the first 5 km from the CBD – or start in selected suburbs where residents are more receptive. Perhaps setting a 50 kmh limit on a multi-lane arterial like Bell St is too ambitious at this time. But private vehicles already account for 90% of all motorised travel in Australia’s capital cities; politicians and lobbyists need to get serious about “taming” cars.

(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 thoughts on “Is it time for a 40 kmh speed limit in cities?

  1. John

    In answer to concerns like Sue B’s, my compromise suggestion would be to have a 40kph speed limit on all streets that don’t have white lines in the middle. Probably most of the white roads on the pictured map, as well as the brown ones, would keep a higher limit, but there would still be great improvements to safety and amenity on the vast majority of local access streets. Probably no-one would be more than 1km from a higher speed road and no trip would be more than 1 minute longer.

  2. Sue B

    You forget that a vast number of people travel on the roads when there is little to no traffic (eg, at night). It already takes me 30 mins to get home (12 kms) in the middle of the night because of the stupid bloody traffic lights. Now you want to make people go even SLOWER? You DO realise that going slower makes the traffic worse not better, don’t you? The longer it takes a car to get from one end of a road to another, the more cars are going to be stuck on there longer, hence more traffic AND more risk of accidents. (this also makes it harder for pedestrians to cross the road, and they start doing stupid things like jumping out whenever, or standing on the double white lines in the middle of the road)

    Do you think it’s fair that I should trundle along at 40 on a completely empty road just because you think there are too many cars on the road outside your child’s school? Get a grip. They’ve made all the shopping streets 40, and in the process made them vastly more UNsafe because now pedestrians just jump out in front of you because you are *supposed* to be going slower now. Not to mention vast lengths of those roads (eg High St from Armadale to Punt Rd) aren’t actually shopping strips but are still 40 zones. Nobody who drives for a living was consulted, I am sure.

    And BELL ST. They already ruined it and made it a 60 zone, which was completely unnecessary in Preston and Heidelberg West. (mind you if you want to do something REAL to make it safer you could do worse than remove the lampposts from hard up against the edge of the road in Coburg and further west)

    No I’m sorry you are way off the mark with this one.

  3. Itsarort

    Why not just make it 10?

    1. Alan Davies

      Funny you should ask that. The main disagreement with this article on Twitter is that the speed limit should be 30/40 kmh, not 40/50 kmh (the logic of 30 kmh is that the probability of a pedestrian being killed when struck by a motorists at this speed is almost zero).

      1. drsmithy

        I imagine the probability of a pedestrian being struck at the speed is substantially increased, given the driver isn’t going to be looking anywhere else except the speedo.

        Are pedestrians going to be asked to bear any responsibility for their behaviour at some point ?

        1. Alan Davies

          Plenty of ways to help motorists drive within the limit without reducing their vigilance. The obvious one is traffic calming for 30/40 kmh streets, but we can’t be too far away from tech solutions like auto speed governors and, of course, AVs. My modest 3 yo car can be programmed to beep when nominated speeds are exceeded.

          I think the balance of responsibility between motorists on the one hand, and pedestrians and roadside land uses on the other, is tipped too far in the former’s favour at present.

  4. Jacob HSR

    If the limit is permanently 40km/h or 50km/h, then paint the limit on the road so we do not miss it.

    Given that electric skateboards are a thing and given that batteries have crashed in price (thanks Mr Musk), I think electric bicycles will be a thing soon.

    Thus we should turn a lot of residential roads into one way roads and build a cycleway along said roads.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details