Menu
Scroll to top
Topic: Committee for Melbourne
What’s the problem airport rail would solve?

What’s the problem airport rail would solve?

There needs to be a clear and focused justification for spending billions of dollars on building a rail line from the CBD to Melbourne Airport

What are the key issues for Melbourne Airport rail?

What are the key issues for Melbourne Airport rail?

The solution is seen as a single rail line, but it should be conceived as the package of infrastructure and policies that will best improve the accessibility of Melbourne Airport

Should replacing level crossings be given higher priority?

Should replacing level crossings be given higher priority?

The Committee for Melbourne has called for a $17.2 billion program to remove all Melbourne’s level crossings over the next 20 years. The Committee says just two separations of road and rail were constructed by the Kennett government and two by the Bracks/Brumby government. While Melbourne has 172 level crossings, Sydney tackled the issue years […]

What’s good (and bad) about greater diversity?

What’s good (and bad) about greater diversity?

A standard objective these days in high-level city strategic plans is greater diversity. It’s mentioned, for example, in Melbourne 2030, in the Committee for Melbourne’s Beyond 5 Million and in The Grattan Institute’s The Cities We Need (see graphic). The Grattan Institute says diversity is important because “many economists think that mixing of ethnicity, age, […]

Is Melbourne better today than it was in the sixties?

Is Melbourne better today than it was in the sixties?

I’ve previously discussed the argument advanced by the CEO of the Committee for Melbourne, Andrew Mcleod, that Melbourne can get better as it gets bigger. Mr Mcleod has another interesting contention – he argues that Melbourne is unambiguously better and more liveable today than it was in 1960. Back then Melbourne had a population of […]

Is a bigger Melbourne a better Melbourne?

Is a bigger Melbourne a better Melbourne?

A bigger Melbourne need not inevitably be a worse Melbourne. Many much larger cities are sought-after locations, suggesting scale and density have advantages. The key task is to manage growth well.

Is the online version of The Age still a paper?

Is the online version of The Age still a paper?

The online version of The Age is hard to navigate and seems to be conceived as if its made of paper rather than electrons